some pretty simple minds on show in this thread
being bigger of course is an advantage, but it's not the be all end all.
Tyson in his prime was one of the most vicious HW's of all time, some welterweights are taller than him...
Valuev was 7 foot tall and was a hairy robot who lost to a near 50 year old Evander Holyfield...
has the game improved in 90 year's? yes obviously, but let's not forget Mike tyson studied Jack dempsey and modeled himself partly on him.
Dempsey also beat down a giant 6'7 Jess willard in one of the most brutal and vicious beat down's of all time, And people were fearing for Jack's life before the bout, Willard had already killed a man, and most were fearing the same outcome..
being bigger of course is an advantage, but it's not the be all end all.
Tyson in his prime was one of the most vicious HW's of all time, some welterweights are taller than him...
Valuev was 7 foot tall and was a hairy robot who lost to a near 50 year old Evander Holyfield...
has the game improved in 90 year's? yes obviously, but let's not forget Mike tyson studied Jack dempsey and modeled himself partly on him.
Dempsey also beat down a giant 6'7 Jess willard in one of the most brutal and vicious beat down's of all time, And people were fearing for Jack's life before the bout, Willard had already killed a man, and most were fearing the same outcome..
Comment