Comments Thread For: Cotto: Kirkland is The Best Name Out There For Me To Fight

[rrayvez]

Lololololol! That's like saying resume is all the courses you've taken at a tertiary institiute, and not the ones that you've passed.

Lol, you clown!

So what? Berto faced Floyd Mayweather, I guess he has a better resume than Keith Thurman then, right?

Lmao! You're a clown man. Resume is obviously the fighters that you have beaten. Or Maybe lets's say Dehaupus has a better resume than Wilder and Joshua because he faced Wilder and Povetkin?

Lol, gtfoh!!!

yet another ****** who must be schooled. Allow me to elaborate so that even an idiot like you can understand. The original debate is whether cotto is a cherry picker or not. Based on the number of top fighters he's faced, it proves he's faced top fighters and isn't someone that should be labeled a cherry picker. Your boxing resume consists of everyone you have faced win or lose, what you've accomplished and whether you're a hall of famer is based on who you've beaten. Do you get it or is that too advanced a concept for you to grasp? Your comparison of grades for a course at school is ******. An actual resume is used for jobs so in your resume you list all the jobs you've had, whether you work for a high end business or whether you sell mangos on the highway such as yourself.

[Big_L]

I have a set of tickets in 204 row 1 for face value if anyone wants them. PM me.

[bambam182]

hahahahahahah look at this dumbazed Ducknelo cak rider contradict himself.

So King Cotto needs to fight them but Ducknelo can duck them? ahahahhahhhahahahhahaha!!! Your brain must be filled with Quaknelo's semen bra'. Go back to your cave and keep drain Ducknelo's balzs.

****** idiot cant comprehend what he reads, go back to elementary.

canelo is in his prime, he doesnt need to show anyone that he is a fighter past his prime. cotto does. cotto cant say that he is releveant by beating someone like Kirkland coming off a KO loss in over 20 months. canelo already beat cotto anyways, you still hurt by that? ducking ducking ducking ducking ducking ducking,.

[bambam182]

again, tell me who has a better list of fighters faced? If Canelo truly whooped cotto then why did TV Azteca have cotto winning? Why did Chavez Sr, Marquez, Barrera, nacho berenstein, Fernando vargas, mikey Garcia all score the fight for cotto or have it a draw? If there were actual boxing gods, the best thing they could do is rid the sport of Canelo fans. You guys are the dumbest group of fans ever. And that's saying a lot considering there are *******s and *****s out there. Canelo makes it impossible to defend him based on how much of a coward he's proven to be by handing over his belt, making ridiculous demands, catchweights for 3 straight yrs, shortchange offers but I get it, you have a man crush and love him unconditionally so he can do no wrong in your eyes. I don't like cotto fighting Kirkland, I personally think he should fight Bradley and retire but at the end of the day, he's a 1st ballot Hall of famer and 4 division world champ so you continue to make yourself sound ****** by questioning his resume.

who has accomplished more by 26 years old? answer the question. who won between cotto and canelo? canelo straight whooped his ass. your ass still sore from the beating canelo gave cotto? fact is cotto fights bums coming off losses. oh yeah, cotto loses all his big fights. unless the fighter is crippled, like margaritos eye, martinez knee. he even lost to clottey ROFL.

name cottos 3 top wins? out of those 3 fighters, how many of them were already injured? ANSWER IT ducking boy.

[Raonic]

I like Kirkland fight but GGG, Bradley, or Lemiuex would've been possible fights too that I would've favoured in Dec to Feb. Hopefully we see him fight Bradley/Khan/Brook in his last fight later 2017.

[rrayvez]

who has accomplished more by 26 years old? answer the question. who won between cotto and canelo? canelo straight whooped his ass. I your ass still sore from the beating canelo gave cotto? fact is cotto fights bums coming off losses. oh yeah, cotto loses all his big fights. unless the fighter is crippled, like margaritos eye, martinez knee. he even lost to clottey ROFL.

name cottos 3 top wins? out of those 3 fighters, how many of them were already injured? ANSWER IT ducking boy.

I know you think Canelo is God's gift to boxing and you jerk off to his fight posters but get real, his biggest accomplishment at 26 is getting help from the judges in close fights and running like a bit*ch from ggg. He has idiot fans like you who really believe he is great and buy the bull**** drag queen Oscar puts out but in reality he literally pulled the biggest duck move in boxing history, yet you have the nerve to argue that someone else is a ducker? The only explanation as to why you're so passionate about Canelo is probably because in real life you're a pu$$y who's never boxed a day in his life so you try to live through your man crush. The best thing you can do is jump off a bridge because you're only leading yourself to disappointment by putting your hopes on a guy who will get destroyed the second he finally man's up and fights ggg. As far as his fight with cotto, you should be ashamed that your God couldn't even stop or beat up a fighter 10 yrs older and 20 pounds lighter. Meanwhile, every mexican boxer /trainer who matters that's asked about that fight thought Canelo lost. He's a lame, just like his cornball fans.

[bambam182]

I know you think Canelo is God's gift to boxing and you jerk off to his fight posters but get real, his biggest accomplishment at 26 is getting help from the judges in close fights and running like a bit*ch from ggg. He has idiot fans like you who really believe he is great and buy the bull**** drag queen Oscar puts out but in reality he literally pulled the biggest duck move in boxing history, yet you have the nerve to argue that someone else is a ducker? The only explanation as to why you're so passionate about Canelo is probably because in real life you're a pu$$y who's never boxed a day in his life so you try to live through your man crush. The best thing you can do is jump off a bridge because you're only leading yourself to disappointment by putting your hopes on a guy who will get destroyed the second he finally man's up and fights ggg. As far as his fight with cotto, you should be ashamed that your God couldn't even stop or beat up a fighter 10 yrs older and 20 pounds lighter. Meanwhile, every mexican boxer /trainer who matters that's asked about that fight thought Canelo lost. He's a lame, just like his cornball fans.

ROFL....OK back to my question you avoided. name cottos 3 top wins? out of those 3 how many of them had injuries going into the fight that effected the outcome?

answer that, dont run around the question.

and yes your also the same guy who thought yuri foreman was a top fighter BWAHAHAAHAHAHA.

answer my questions now, dont avoid them like cotto avoided GGG when kellerman asked him ROFL. by the way canelos team offered GGG ten million, who turned it down?

[rrayvez]

ROFL....OK back to my question you avoided. name cottos 3 top wins? out of those 3 how many of them had injuries going into the fight that effected the outcome?

answer that, dont run around the question.

and yes your also the same guy who thought yuri foreman was a top fighter BWAHAHAAHAHAHA.

answer my questions now, dont avoid them like cotto avoided GGG when kellerman asked him ROFL. by the way canelos team offered GGG ten million, who turned it down?

1. I never said foreman was a top fighter. I said he was an undefeated world champion who won his belt from a credible champion and wasn't a cherry pick. 2. Yes you can criticize and say Margarito had a bad eye or that Martinez had a bad knee the same way you can say that cottos loss to Margarito was because he had plaster wraps or his loss to pac was because he was weight drained. Anyone can literally criticize the resume of any top fighter. I can say that in 2 of canelos best wins he was out landed and his opponents were robbed. I can say that in 2 of Floyd's best wins that his opponents were past their prime, I can say that in 2 of pacs best wins that his opponents were weight drained, I could say that Chavez lost to the best 2 opponents he fought after facing 90% cab drivers. I could literally come up with an argument for any big name fighter ever to minimize their accomplishments if I wanted to. 3. As far as the 10 Mil offer to ggg, no ppv upside was offered. All it was is a creative way to duck the fight so canelos gullible fans like you can try and turn the table and say ggg is ducking Canelo. Everyone knows that ggg, who has sold out arenas in NY, la and UK and brings in good numbers when he fights on hbo deserves at least some of the ppv money. Even khan got ppv money and made 10 Mil to fight Canelo and he hasn't accomplished anything relevant in 5 yrs. Ggg is the reigning mw champ and is considered a top pound for pound fighter so not offering him any ppv means Canelo and Oscar really don't want the fight. Are you really too ****** to see that or just biased??

[Sledgeweather17]

yet another ****** who must be schooled. Allow me to elaborate so that even an idiot like you can understand. The original debate is whether cotto is a cherry picker or not. Based on the number of top fighters he's faced, it proves he's faced top fighters and isn't someone that should be labeled a cherry picker. Your boxing resume consists of everyone you have faced win or lose, what you've accomplished and whether you're a hall of famer is based on who you've beaten. Do you get it or is that too advanced a concept for you to grasp? Your comparison of grades for a course at school is ******. An actual resume is used for jobs so in your resume you list all the jobs you've had, whether you work for a high end business or whether you sell mangos on the highway such as yourself.

So would it be a good resume if you got fired at all your 'good jobs'?

Gtfoh with that ****! Everyone know's a fighter's resume is judged by his victories.

Fighting good fighters and losing to all of them is a **** resume!

It don't matter what topic you were discussing, it doesn't give you the right to make that ludicrous statement.

Resume is the guy's you beat, end of story!

[rrayvez]

So would it be a good resume if you got fired at all your 'good jobs'?

Gtfoh with that ****! Everyone know's a fighter's resume is judged by his victories.

Fighting good fighters and losing to all of them is a **** resume!

It don't matter what topic you were discussing, it doesn't give you the right to make that ludicrous statement.

Resume is the guy's you beat, end of story!

ok, clearly this is like trying to teach a baboon to read because you're not smart enough to get it. Your resume is who you fought, your overall career is then judged by who you've beaten and world titles you've won. Simple question, Is cotto a hall of famer? If your answer is yes, then stfu because your argument about whether his resume is good or not is pointless because he wouldn't be considered a hall Of famer if his resume was weak . If your answer is no, stfu because that means you don't know **** about boxing.