Comments Thread For: Cotto: Kirkland is The Best Name Out There For Me To Fight

[The Gambler1981]

There is a portion of the phrase missing~

Kirkland is the best name out there for me to fight that I can defeat in a crowd pleasing manner.

[rrayvez]

cotto you ****ing bum, you could have fought lara, charlo brothers, andrade even waited for kell brook or fought liam smith for his return bought.

cotto always takes easy fights after a loss and its always against a bum and then cotto fans and lampley will say cotto is back lol.

newsflash, just about everyone fights a low risk opponent after a loss and especially if the lass is followed by a long lay off. Pac fought rios after Marquez ko'd him Canelo fought Angulo after mayweather schooled him, etc. Nobody should think cotto is back if he kos Kirkland but mentioning beefy Smith as a more dangerous option is ridiculous. As for Charlos, an old head like cotto shouldn't be the one getting in there, it should be the supposed best fighter in the world and self titled jmw Canelo.

[b00g13man]

[Baltimore]

Does Cotto think we are ******?

[PETUFF]

Andre Berto better fight but KirlAND is decent too!!

[r1onnie2]

LMAO, I can easily name five better Names than Kirkland.

[JakeTheBoxer]

Bad fight. There are way better options; Jermall Charlo for example. But Cotto wants someone beatable, i guess.

[bambam182]

newsflash, just about everyone fights a low risk opponent after a loss and especially if the lass is followed by a long lay off. Pac fought rios after Marquez ko'd him Canelo fought Angulo after mayweather schooled him, etc. Nobody should think cotto is back if he kos Kirkland but mentioning beefy Smith as a more dangerous option is ridiculous. As for Charlos, an old head like cotto shouldn't be the one getting in there, it should be the supposed best fighter in the world and self titled jmw Canelo.

ROFL idiot, everyone said cotto was back after he knocked out delvin HAHAHA. smith is more of a threat then krikland who hasnt fought since may 2015 lol.

dont justify for cotto ***g0t. look at froch, lost to ward and came back right away to fight an undefeated bute. look at all of cottos opponents after he came off a lost. michael jennings? who is that and where is he? one legged yuri foreman, tried that with trout but trout schooled him. if cotto wants to prove he STILL has it, then yes he should be the one getting in their with charlo, he has something to gain by showing he isnt shot. canelo doesnt need to be in there, no one knows the charlos, no money. moron. ****** ducking boy.

[Edward90]

Except he knows Bradley, Brook, Charlo etc would likely box his ears off to yet another humiliating defeat ala Canelo, Trout. So he picks an ok but not great boxer, whom he thinks he can avoid direct punches from. It's a minor gamble, but really, this fight is all about the cash grab and nothing more. It serves nothing in furthering legacy status.

As far as adding to Cotto's legacy, only Pacquiao rematch, Marquez, Canelo rematch, or GGG would really do that right now. Cotto is already a HOF and has no titles to hinder the young ones from establishing a name for themselves, although he could enhance their profiles by fighting them... I don't know. Cotto isn't a big ducker, so if the logistics make sense, I don't know why he would turn those down. Brook would probably only net more money if it was in the UK. charlo still isn't a big name. I can't explain why Bradley didn't happen. It should have. That's the fight I wanted to see...

[rrayvez]

ROFL idiot, everyone said cotto was back after he knocked out delvin HAHAHA. smith is more of a threat then krikland who hasnt fought since may 2015 lol.

dont justify for cotto ***g0t. look at froch, lost to ward and came back right away to fight an undefeated bute. look at all of cottos opponents after he came off a lost. michael jennings? who is that and where is he? one legged yuri foreman, tried that with trout but trout schooled him. if cotto wants to prove he STILL has it, then yes he should be the one getting in their with charlo, he has something to gain by showing he isnt shot. canelo doesnt need to be in there, no one knows the charlos, no money. moron. ****** ducking boy.

the fact that your user name is bam bam like Brandon Rios tells me all I need to know. Obviously you're a special kind of ******. So undefeated world champion yuri foreman who just came off beating Daniel Santos was a cherry pick? Trout, who beat cotto and was also an undefeated world champion was also intended to be a cherry pick? On top of that ****** comment, you also said that cotto who is past his prime and in his last yr of boxing should fight Charlos but then say Canelo, who is supposed to be a top fighter in his prime should duck the Charlos because they bring no money? Yet you're OK with Canelo fighting no hope fighters like beefy and khan? So cotto shouldn't duck the charlos but Canelo should? You just went full ****** and should probably off yourself as there is no going back.