Rate from 1-10. Wards win over (weight drained?) Chad dawson

[Mr. Objectivity]

A "casual" is not name calling. Its a designation, and a real category of spectator. When someone calls you a casual and then demonstrates why he used the term, this is not an attack on the person.

There is film, analysis, etc that shows Ward did a superior job neutralizing a world class fighter, who was called one of the pound for pound best at the time. Casual fans seem to assume that Dawson being drained is the be all and end all of that fight, far from it. People with experience can see things Ward did in that fight that had nothing to do with Dawson's weight. its really that simple.

So Pretty much Them Ward tards basically choose when a fighter is weight drained or not...based on their agenda cant make this things up:*******:

[BrometheusBob.]

naaah. i havent seen any one score more than 6.5.

Before the fight, half the people here said Chad would be too much. He'd just finished clowning Hopkins. Then, only after the fight, it became "Chad was drained!!"
No matter what Ward does, there's going to be a playpen full of crybabies trying to take it from him.

Solid win. Pretty much ruined Dawson. 7/10 (would be 8 but Chad hasn't done anything since).

9. World class Dawson was dominated.

And I bet Larryx would also give >6.5. Not sure what I'd vote but it may also be >6.5 if that were an option.

[Mr. Objectivity]

And I bet Larryx would also give >6.5. Not sure what I'd vote but it may also be >6.5 if that were an option.

My bad.

I was arguing/debating with someone else to notice those post.

[billeau2]

So Pretty much Them Ward tards basically choose when a fighter is weight drained or not...based on their agenda cant make this things up:*******:

?

Never mind... nothing more needs to be said. You started out crying that I hurt your feelings, so I took you seriously enough to provide tape evidence, examples for all points made...and you resorted to: characterizing the argument instead of responding to it, and the very thing that hurted your feelings...in between that time with other posters you incorrectly corrected a poster, apparently unaware of the difference between loss and lost, and bragged about your job... yet another indication of someone who is "losing."

Come back with something worthwhile and Ill hollar at ya kid, in the meantime goodnight, logic is not your forte.

Did I ever introduce you to my dear friend Elroy?

[Doctor_Tenma]

Dawson was getting caught too cleanly, that played far more of a role than making '68 in my opinion. Had the fight taken place at 175 and Dawson got caught like that in the same manner, same results.

I rate an 8.

[HeroBando]

Dawson was getting caught too cleanly, that played far more of a role than making '68 in my opinion. Had the fight taken place at 175 and Dawson got caught like that in the same manner, same results.

I rate an 8.

What would you rate PACs win over Oscar then, a 16?

[Doctor_Tenma]

What would you rate PACs win over Oscar then, a 16?

Dawson was getting the better of Ward in the early rounds, Oscar looked like he needed to be checked into a hospital. I don't know, you tell me.

[Larry the boss]

Yes it is. He knew Dawson would be badly drained. We're not talking about 2-3 lbs here, we're talking about a whole division he dropped. If Ward wanted credit he knew what to do, but that's not Ward's style,You know what he's like, so don't pretend you don't.

Dawson volunteered to drop to 168 live on HBO why do ya'll ignore that and blame Ward?

[RomanReigns]

Dawson was getting the better of Ward in the early rounds, Oscar looked like he needed to be checked into a hospital. I don't know, you tell me.

This

Dela Hoya looked like a Zombie. Even Roach knew that Oscar had some IV Fluids.

[Mr. Objectivity]

Dawson volunteered to drop to 168 live on HBO why do ya'll ignore that and blame Ward?

because its not a ten. its a 6.5 at best , but 4 is the more realistic score tbh