Rate from 1-10. Wards win over (weight drained?) Chad dawson

[mlac]

It's called observing the sport and not being a cheerleader.
Here's the thing you casuals don't ever look at. The guy who is cutting has an advantage in that he's a naturally larger man. It was Chad's choice to take that cut. I don't buy into this weaselly life philosophy that there are no winners and losers. Each man knew what he was signing up for, and the fans and media who were predicting a Dawson win did too.

Chad was the first one to say it wasn't the weight (which he later backtracked on). You might have some credibility if you weren't one of the clowns that credits Golovkin's opponents as being exceptional.

I love how you don't actually respond to my post and resort to desperate and pathetic namecalling instead ' your a casual tho ' ad hominem bro, it means you lost the debate/argument before it even starts.

The irony is strong when you call me a cheerleader. Who exactly am i a cheerleader for? the only guy i openly am bias for on here is parker, and i admit both his recent wins are very close.

Whereas are you cheerleading for your guy in every single thread i read and acting like a little b!tch when someone disagrees with your opinion, calling them crybabies, salty, casuals etc. bit pathetic tbh.

No one denies that chad dawson was horribly horribly drained. But here comes red fox with his deluded narrative of its all a conspiracy of ward haters!!!!!!

Why can't you see how pathetic that is? do you read your own posts back?
Perhaps you should mate, because you look like a bit of a loon.

oh and well done on not suddenly mentioning golovkins name when no one else has, Ive never mentioned anything ever, about any GGG opponent being exception LOL....that's all part of your conspiracy theory isnt it? all ward haters are kovalev fan's and therefore because they are kovalev fan's they are GGG fan's and its all part of this intrinsic web of hate that is party racial in your bizarre weird little mind

[Mr. Objectivity]

It's called observing the sport and not being a cheerleader.
Here's the thing you casuals don't ever look at. The guy who is cutting has an advantage in that he's a naturally larger man. It was Chad's choice to take that cut. I don't buy into this weaselly life philosophy that there are no winners and losers. Each man knew what he was signing up for, and the fans and media who were predicting a Dawson win did too.

Chad was the first one to say it wasn't the weight (which he later backtracked on). You might have some credibility if you weren't one of the clowns that credits Golovkin's opponents as being exceptional.

The delusion of Grandeur in this one is strong.

[Sid-Knee]

I give zero credit for the win due to obvious reasons. Dawson was so badly drained that Every little shot from Ward had an effect. He wobbled and dropped him quite a few times. Getting dropped and wobbled by Ward tells you all you need to know.

If I can't give 0, then it's a 1 from me. And even then I don't like doing it because it's too much credit for me.

[big_james10]

How do you rate this Ward win?

Is this a signature win for Ward?

Did Chad going down affect the outcome of this fight?

State your reason.

No fighter is ever weight drained UNLESS they lose.

[Sid-Knee]

Is that Wards problem???No

Yes it is. He knew Dawson would be badly drained. We're not talking about 2-3 lbs here, we're talking about a whole division he dropped. If Ward wanted credit he knew what to do, but that's not Ward's style, he likes to have as many advantages as he can get. You know what he's like, so don't pretend you don't.

[Mr. Objectivity]

Poll added. Do vote. Let your voice be heard. no voting for Ward tards alt.

[Sid-Knee]

Before the fight, half the people here said Chad would be too much. He'd just finished clowning Hopkins. Then, only after the fight, it became "Chad was drained!!"
No matter what Ward does, there's going to be a playpen full of crybabies trying to take it from him.

Solid win. Pretty much ruined Dawson. 7/10 (would be 8 but Chad hasn't done anything since).

Hahahahahahaha So you think dropping a whole division had no effect on Dawson? That he was the same fighter? Hahahahahahahaha

That's ridiculous.

[Mr. Objectivity]

No fighter is ever weight drained UNLESS they lose.

So How do you rate wards win then?

[BrometheusBob.]

lmao the max poll option is 6.5

Mr. Objectivity's troll/race-bait game has officially surpassed Freedom's

[Metho_4u]

It's LOSS not LOST.

corny @ss b1tch

Actually it LOST as in past tense you ****** ****tard Kovalev LOST the fight! Love that ****!