Who do all PPV cards need to be $70?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Robbie Barrett
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2013
    • 40891
    • 2,779
    • 667
    • 570,921

    #31
    Originally posted by Mike D
    How and when did they decide that PPVs should be $70 frigging bucks??

    It's like they went into the meeting room and asked themselves what is the most absurd number that they can get away with

    $70 bucks for a 4 hour card, in which you're lucky if 2 of the fights are even worth watching, is f**king insane
    Didn't it start with Mayweather-Canelo?

    Comment

    • Mike D
      Abnormal Human Being
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jul 2012
      • 13069
      • 1,747
      • 2,352
      • 73,360

      #32
      Originally posted by Isaac Clarke
      Didn't it start with Mayweather-Canelo?
      What was it before that, though? For the longest I remember it being at minimum fifty dollars, and if I recall correctly it went up to $60 and now to $70. Before you know it these motherf**king PPVs will be $80.

      Comment

      • Mike D
        Abnormal Human Being
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jul 2012
        • 13069
        • 1,747
        • 2,352
        • 73,360

        #33
        I mean **** even $50 is absurd

        I get it (I guess) if it was $50 for an actual super fight, but for the majority of the trash PPVs that get put out, even $50 is still way too high

        Comment

        • DinoCop
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Dec 2015
          • 1950
          • 109
          • 117
          • 3,285

          #34
          70 dollars? And I think you guys get paid 1000 at least a month. Too much for a low ro mid class's sport.

          Comment

          • anonymous2.0
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jan 2012
            • 11244
            • 1,896
            • 7
            • 75,058

            #35
            Originally posted by Mike D
            What was it before that, though? For the longest I remember it being at minimum fifty dollars, and if I recall correctly it went up to $60 and now to $70. Before you know it these motherf**king PPVs will be $80.
            I feel as if they deliberately had the two prices - 50 for regular and 60 for HD - and then slowly slid the regular price up to 60 and made the HD 70.

            As boxing fans compared to other sports fans, our situation is less than ideal

            Comment

            • Mike D
              Abnormal Human Being
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jul 2012
              • 13069
              • 1,747
              • 2,352
              • 73,360

              #36
              Originally posted by anonymous2.0
              I feel as if they deliberately had the two prices - 50 for regular and 60 for HD - and then slowly slid the regular price up to 60 and made the HD 70.
              Yeah it did feel that way.

              Comment

              • -Kev-
                this is boxing
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Dec 2006
                • 39960
                • 5,045
                • 1,449
                • 234,543

                #37
                It ****ing sucks lol. I guess it's to adjust for inflation and the growing costs of PPV production and setting up a big boxing match. It sucks but I checked the buying power of $50 in 1995 (just picked a random 90s year) and says it's $79.99. So looking at that, HBO/promoters can still raise the price for HD $10 more dollars and then they will be matching the 1990s $50 a PPV if they want to match inflation

                When adjusted for inflation, we are paying what would've been $44.50 in 1995 as far as the $70 price tag goes. If PPV's were $50 today, that would equal $31.65 in 1995

                Comment

                • Mike D
                  Abnormal Human Being
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jul 2012
                  • 13069
                  • 1,747
                  • 2,352
                  • 73,360

                  #38
                  I mean I ain't rich, but I can afford them and do end up getting the vast majority of PPVs, but f**k, man. Beyond the money it's the damn principle.

                  As we all know most of the undercards are straight trash, of course I watch every second because first off I love the sport, and second to get my "money's worth", but like 80% of the undercard match ups are ESPN Friday Night Fights level ****. Or worse.

                  So basically for all intents and purposes we are paying $70 to see an hour worth of a fight that we actually want to see...and that's if it lasts that long.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP