WTF are you on about? This isn't about ATG ranking, it's about comparing two fights - one was significant bigger, but the fights can be compared by their protagonists.
In this case, the A-side who deserves the greater majority offers a flat fee - the B-side says no, I'm not leaving untold millions on the table.
In both scenarios, Larry and his idiot crew on this site were telling Pac and GGG to take the flat fee.
Pac said no, ended up making $150m. So the idiots were wrong.
But now the idiots are back, saying GGG should take the $10m.
The idiots still haven't learned their lesson.
Is this explanation clear enough for you?
In this case, the A-side who deserves the greater majority offers a flat fee - the B-side says no, I'm not leaving untold millions on the table.
In both scenarios, Larry and his idiot crew on this site were telling Pac and GGG to take the flat fee.
Pac said no, ended up making $150m. So the idiots were wrong.
But now the idiots are back, saying GGG should take the $10m.
The idiots still haven't learned their lesson.
Is this explanation clear enough for you?
Comment