Why is erislandy lara made out to be such a great fighter on here?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • satiev1
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Nov 2015
    • 4661
    • 575
    • 0
    • 78,492

    #61
    Because there is no one else for the racist trolls to talk about. So they have to hype up somebody to challenge ggg.

    Comment

    • Ray*
      Be safe!!!
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jul 2005
      • 44867
      • 1,654
      • 1,608
      • 558,890

      #62
      Got destroyed just in the first page alone.

      Comment

      • Mammoth
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2016
        • 35717
        • 3,849
        • 3,389
        • 378,304

        #63
        Originally posted by Scipio2009
        K2 tries to act as if Lara doesn't even exist.
        I do too. After the Charlo/Trout fight I switched channels.

        Comment

        • Scipio2009
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Apr 2014
          • 13741
          • 276
          • 64
          • 98,172

          #64
          Originally posted by Kigali
          Max Kellerman actually said GGG has unusually long arms
          I doubt that he's longer than Lara, unusual arms or not

          Comment

          • elfag
            Alpha fäggot
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jan 2008
            • 15667
            • 3,501
            • 302
            • 65,929

            #65
            Originally posted by -Kev-
            Yet he'd be the best fighter on GGG's resume

            This. People want to see the fight AND he'd be the best name on GGG's resume. If its such an easy fight, then why is GGG ducking the chance to get a real A level guy on his resume? GGG himself stated that little welterweight Brook is the best guy he ever fought.

            Almost 35 and his best win is over a B level welterweight. Brook wasnt even the best or lineal welterweight, relatively untested at that weight. What a joke.

            Why not atleast get a win over the 1st/2nd super welterweight in the world?

            Comment

            • Mammoth
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Sep 2016
              • 35717
              • 3,849
              • 3,389
              • 378,304

              #66
              Originally posted by el***
              why is GGG ducking the chance to get a real A level guy on his resume?
              Because they guy he's ducking's interest only goes so far as twitter

              Comment

              • Scipio2009
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Apr 2014
                • 13741
                • 276
                • 64
                • 98,172

                #67
                Originally posted by bigdramashow
                wouldnt be shocked if he did fold up from the first shot tbh, hes not a middleweight, brook wasnt a middleweight, and as soon as brook got hit clean he got wobbled in round 1. If canelo (the guy with the worst footwork in boxing) managed to close the distance on lara, GGG would be on him like a rash
                Canelo Alvarez commits to fighting inside in a way that Golovkin has never fathomed fighting. People always ignore the point, but the only time that Golovkin seems confident to throw anything is if he's at midrange and his opponent is in front of him; if he's long, he simply stalks forward, and if he's in close, he's quite likely to engage a clinch/turtle up.

                Brook got wobbled with the shot in the first round, but he didn't go down, fought his way back into the fight, and was on the cusp of making things real interesting, had his eye socket not failed him. Brook did end up having the fight called off on his feet, so it's not like he folded either.

                With Lara happy to keep the fight long and on his toes, and Golovkin not really like to do much of anything on the inside, the pattern of the potential fight seems well set to me; Lara, keeping busy with his lead jab, fires straight shots to the head and body from range, Golovkin tries to stalk Lara down, Golovkin gets to the range he likes and looks to fire, only for Lara to spin back out and get back to distance. rinse/cycle/repeat.

                Golovkin may be able to get off a big shot and change things, but I'm still unconvinced that his actual punch power is all that.

                Just sit back and watch the fight: Lara-Angulo and Alvarez-Lara are both available, in their entirety, online, among other fights. Maybe there are examples elsewhere, but I've never seen Golovkin utilize any of the skills needed that made those fights go the way they did.

                Comment

                • 12TRIBEsRiSe
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jan 2012
                  • 4772
                  • 136
                  • 212
                  • 11,191

                  #68
                  he is a very good fighter I don't hear anyone calling him great tho. GGG should fight him, hed be the best name on his resume

                  Comment

                  • Madison Boxing
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jul 2015
                    • 35364
                    • 6,455
                    • 3,367
                    • 190,590

                    #69
                    Originally posted by Scipio2009
                    Canelo Alvarez commits to fighting inside in a way that Golovkin has never fathomed fighting. People always ignore the point, but the only time that Golovkin seems confident to throw anything is if he's at midrange and his opponent is in front of him; if he's long, he simply stalks forward, and if he's in close, he's quite likely to engage a clinch/turtle up.

                    Brook got wobbled with the shot in the first round, but he didn't go down, fought his way back into the fight, and was on the cusp of making things real interesting, had his eye socket not failed him. Brook did end up having the fight called off on his feet, so it's not like he folded either.

                    With Lara happy to keep the fight long and on his toes, and Golovkin not really like to do much of anything on the inside, the pattern of the potential fight seems well set to me; Lara, keeping busy with his lead jab, fires straight shots to the head and body from range, Golovkin tries to stalk Lara down, Golovkin gets to the range he likes and looks to fire, only for Lara to spin back out and get back to distance. rinse/cycle/repeat.

                    Golovkin may be able to get off a big shot and change things, but I'm still unconvinced that his actual punch power is all that.

                    Just sit back and watch the fight: Lara-Angulo and Alvarez-Lara are both available, in their entirety, online, among other fights. Maybe there are examples elsewhere, but I've never seen Golovkin utilize any of the skills needed that made those fights go the way they did.
                    ive watched all the fights. I respect your opinion but to me brook was trying to keep it at range and it didnt do him much good against GGG, he just walked through the punches. People criticise GGG way too much, he turned a potentially hard nights work into an easy 5 round demolition job. He'd do the same against lara, even if lara manages to make him look a bit clumsy at times he isnt going to land enough punches to win rounds. The whole theory sounds right with styles, but lara just isnt good enough.

                    Comment

                    • Madison Boxing
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jul 2015
                      • 35364
                      • 6,455
                      • 3,367
                      • 190,590

                      #70
                      Originally posted by el***
                      This. People want to see the fight AND he'd be the best name on GGG's resume. If its such an easy fight, then why is GGG ducking the chance to get a real A level guy on his resume? GGG himself stated that little welterweight Brook is the best guy he ever fought.

                      Almost 35 and his best win is over a B level welterweight. Brook wasnt even the best or lineal welterweight, relatively untested at that weight. What a joke.

                      Why not atleast get a win over the 1st/2nd super welterweight in the world?
                      and to everyone raving about lara, if GGG does ever fight him i dont want you to start changing your tunes 'oh he fighting a smaller man again' 'lara is canelos leftovers' etc

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP