Comments Thread For: Arum's Take on Adrien Broner Bypassing Pacquiao PPV Fight

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bronx2245
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2013
    • 28582
    • 5,445
    • 1,436
    • 162,064

    #41
    Originally posted by Strive 4 Truth
    Floyd knew he would be Gatti. Broner knows he wont be Pac. Gotta win to get this so called A-side crap. Another plague left behind by Floyd that hurts the sport, along with becoming basically irrelevant after a loss. Broner is gonna do what he thinks is best, few more losses and we wont see him anymore. Hes taking winnable fights for the time being.
    I don't blame Floyd. Floyd has been B-side to Gatti and De La Hoya. Broner is acting as if he didn't lose to Maidana and Porter! Floyd didn't lose to anyone! Broner has adopted the "image" but not the "Hard Work, Dedication!" That's Broner's fault, not Floyd's fault!

    Comment

    • Strive 4 Truth
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Sep 2015
      • 690
      • 17
      • 0
      • 6,883

      #42
      Originally posted by Bronx2245
      I don't blame Floyd. Floyd has been B-side to Gatti and De La Hoya. Broner is acting as if he didn't lose to Maidana and Porter! Floyd didn't lose to anyone! Broner has adopted the "image" but not the "Hard Work, Dedication!" That's Broner's fault, not Floyd's fault!
      HUH!? Broner is who he is, Floyd put a dark cloud over the entire sport with big money fights and becoming irrelevant after a loss. Broner should have taken the Pac fight all day long. He most likely loses but wins in the same way.

      Comment

      • Bronx2245
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2013
        • 28582
        • 5,445
        • 1,436
        • 162,064

        #43
        Originally posted by Strive 4 Truth
        HUH!? Broner is who he is, Floyd put a dark cloud over the entire sport with big money fights and becoming irrelevant after a loss. Broner should have taken the Pac fight all day long. He most likely loses but wins in the same way.
        If Floyd had created a situation where a fighter is irrelevant after a loss, then why was Pacquiao pursuing Broner instead of Garcia? Why was Pacquiao pursuing Broner instead of Thurman? Garcia has never lost. Thurman has never lost. Broner has lost twice @ WW! By you're logic, what does that say about Pacquiao? Think before you speak!

        Comment

        • Fetta
          nob cheese
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jan 2011
          • 16696
          • 417
          • 3
          • 24,315

          #44
          It was ALWAYS Vargas

          No need to pretend

          Comment

          • GMAN SUPREME
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Sep 2014
            • 5974
            • 160
            • 26
            • 13,658

            #45
            Originally posted by Fetta
            It was ALWAYS Vargas

            No need to pretend
            you dumbass broner himself confirmed he was given an offer.

            Comment

            • daggum
              All time great
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2008
              • 43754
              • 4,678
              • 3
              • 166,270

              #46
              Originally posted by Fetta
              It was ALWAYS Vargas

              No need to pretend
              it was always vargas? cept when it wasnt and broner turned down a career high payday with ppv upside meaning if he was as popular as he claimed he earns millions more but he just didn't want it.

              Comment

              • Fetta
                nob cheese
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jan 2011
                • 16696
                • 417
                • 3
                • 24,315

                #47
                Originally posted by GMAN SUPREME
                you dumbass broner himself confirmed he was given an offer.
                Yes i know. Just because it was offered means nothing.

                Always going to be Vargas!

                Comment

                • Fetta
                  nob cheese
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jan 2011
                  • 16696
                  • 417
                  • 3
                  • 24,315

                  #48
                  Originally posted by daggum
                  it was always vargas? cept when it wasnt and broner turned down a career high payday with ppv upside meaning if he was as popular as he claimed he earns millions more but he just didn't want it.
                  It was never gonna happen.

                  Always Vargas!

                  Comment

                  • Strive 4 Truth
                    Interim Champion
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Sep 2015
                    • 690
                    • 17
                    • 0
                    • 6,883

                    #49
                    Originally posted by Bronx2245
                    If Floyd had created a situation where a fighter is irrelevant after a loss, then why was Pacquiao pursuing Broner instead of Garcia? Why was Pacquiao pursuing Broner instead of Thurman? Garcia has never lost. Thurman has never lost. Broner has lost twice @ WW! By you're logic, what does that say about Pacquiao? Think before you speak!
                    Pac vs Garcia was dicussed, was it not? Plus its not the boxing world that pushes a losing fighter aside. Its the media and fans that throw someone under the rug once they lose. Fighters are not done after a loss, its happens but they can still make something happen.

                    Comment

                    • Bronx2245
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • May 2013
                      • 28582
                      • 5,445
                      • 1,436
                      • 162,064

                      #50
                      Originally posted by Strive 4 Truth
                      Pac vs Garcia was dicussed, was it not? Plus its not the boxing world that pushes a losing fighter aside. Its the media and fans that throw someone under the rug once they lose. Fighters are not done after a loss, its happens but they can still make something happen.
                      The media and fans love Pacquiao, Cotto, Broner, Marquez, Canelo, Salido, Lomachenko, etc. They all have losses! I Just don't see what you're seeing.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP