Everyone Wants to Talk About Floyd's IV - What About Pac-Monster's Toradol Abuse???

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Shape up
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2016
    • 3123
    • 64
    • 0
    • 35,399

    #861
    By way of explanation in relation to the aforementioned points:
     An emergency situation occurs when the life of an Athlete could be at risk if he/she is unable to Use the Prohibited Substance or Method; in other words, if the medical condition justifies the treatment and warrants immediate administration.
     Circumstances are considered to be exceptional when, for example, a TUE cannot be granted in time through no fault of the Athlete. Thus, an Athlete with a chronic illness must request a TUE 30 days prior to an event. Nevertheless, the case of a normally healthy Athlete suddenly affected by a significant medical condition some days prior to an event, and unable to request a TUE within the allotted time to enable the TUEC to grant the TUE, may be considered as an “exceptional circumstance”.
     Medical emergencies or acute medical situations requiring administration of an otherwise Prohibited Substance before an application for a TUE can be made are uncommon. Similarly, circumstances requiring expedited consideration of an application for a TUE due to imminent competition are infrequent. Anti-Doping Organisations granting TUEs should have internal procedures that permit such situations to be addressed.

    Comment

    • Shape up
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Sep 2016
      • 3123
      • 64
      • 0
      • 35,399

      #862
      Dark urine doesn't cut it imbecile

      Comment

      • travestyny
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2008
        • 29106
        • 4,962
        • 9,405
        • 4,074,546

        #863
        Originally posted by Shape up
        An Athlete may only be granted retroactive approval for his/her The****utic Use of a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method (i.e., a retroactive TUE) if:
        a. Emergency treatment or treatment of an acute medical condition was necessary; or
        b. Due to other exceptional circumstances, there was insufficient time or opportunity for the Athlete to submit, or for the TUEC to consider, an application for the TUE prior to Sample collection; was it an emergency having dark urine, NOOOO!!!!, was it exceptional circumstances having dark urine, NOOOO!!!!, you loser ****head
        LMAO. READ B. ONE MORE TIME. LMAOOOOOO!!!


        You are a MORONNNNNNN!

        Comment

        • .!WAR MIKEY!.
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Aug 2015
          • 23780
          • 889
          • 769
          • 309,182

          #864
          still cant believe that fool cheated with them iv's. lmfao

          Comment

          • Dosumpthin
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Feb 2016
            • 2340
            • 149
            • 77
            • 25,361

            #865
            Originally posted by Shape up
            By way of explanation in relation to the aforementioned points:
             An emergency situation occurs when the life of an Athlete could be at risk if he/she is unable to Use the Prohibited Substance or Method; in other words, if the medical condition justifies the treatment and warrants immediate administration.
             Circumstances are considered to be exceptional when, for example, a TUE cannot be granted in time through no fault of the Athlete. Thus, an Athlete with a chronic illness must request a TUE 30 days prior to an event. Nevertheless, the case of a normally healthy Athlete suddenly affected by a significant medical condition some days prior to an event, and unable to request a TUE within the allotted time to enable the TUEC to grant the TUE, may be considered as an “exceptional circumstance”.
             Medical emergencies or acute medical situations requiring administration of an otherwise Prohibited Substance before an application for a TUE can be made are uncommon. Similarly, circumstances requiring expedited consideration of an application for a TUE due to imminent competition are infrequent. Anti-Doping Organisations granting TUEs should have internal procedures that permit such situations to be addressed.
            ****** pact@rd can't read.


            Smh.

            Comment

            • ADP02
              Champ
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Apr 2010
              • 13617
              • 415
              • 1
              • 26,360

              #866
              Originally posted by travestyny
              Are you pretending to not be able to follow, or are you really having some difficulty?

              Let me state this clearly for you. For Nick Diaz to drop the metabolite level from 733 to 61ng in that amount of time would put his body into serious risk.

              Is that clear enough for you, or do you want to accuse me of saying something else I never said just so you can type BOOM at the end of more useless drivel?

              There is no need for you to speculate about what he did. WE HAVE THE NUMBERS. 1.009....or did you forget that? So yea, let's ignore that (according to you) he drank an exhorbitant amount of water and his specific gravity was still somehow 1.009.

              You just claimed he previously drank over 5 liters of water (though you don't say in what period of time, so let's glance over that, too) and FAILED. So doesn't that tell you he would have to drink A LOT MORE to have passed this test????? (just as the MRO says!)


              BOOM! Look who keeps putting his foot in his mouth and digging that grave. It's time for you to bow out.


              By the way, I still want you to tell me when you believe he began drinking this water. Please do. I'd love to hear more of your speculation so I can get a good laugh and explain why it makes no sense.
              Correct, Diaz failed before and failed again. History repeats itself ... BOOM!

              If the urine is diluted enough, the amount of marijuana found would be much less. That is the point of diluting or you still not getting it?

              "For example, urine cannabinoids levels which were higher than 10,000 ng / ml dropped to the low 100's after drinking 12 ounces of water. After drinking a gallon of water, with or without one of the "cleansing agents" added, it only took an hour for the specific gravity to drop to less than 1.005."

              BADA-BOOM!

              Diaz drank 1.5 gallons after a fight. You think he wouldn't try to do the same if he thought that he would test positive. Its a no-brainer.

              BTW - Why would QUEST LABs have it wrong? This is NOT the first time that they do these type of tests. In fact, for the 2nd time that DIAZ was caught, he got a QUEST expert witness to back him up!!! TRAVESTNY cannot get a break on this one!

              This guy is a known user. Stop it already! You have no chance.
              Just admit that you are WROOOONG!

              Comment

              • travestyny
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2008
                • 29106
                • 4,962
                • 9,405
                • 4,074,546

                #867
                Originally posted by ADP02
                Correct, Diaz failed before and failed again. History repeats itself ... BOOM!

                If the urine is diluted enough, the amount of marijuana found would be much less. That is the point of diluting or you still not getting it?

                "For example, urine cannabinoids levels which were higher than 10,000 ng / ml dropped to the low 100's after drinking 12 ounces of water. After drinking a gallon of water, with or without one of the "cleansing agents" added, it only took an hour for the specific gravity to drop to less than 1.005."

                BADA-BOOM!

                Diaz drank 1.5 gallons after a fight. You think he wouldn't try to do the same if he thought that he would test positive. Its a no-brainer.

                BTW - Why would QUEST LABs have it wrong? This is NOT the first time that they do these type of tests. In fact, for the 2nd time that DIAZ was caught, he got a QUEST expert witness to back him up!!! TRAVESTNY cannot get a break on this one!

                This guy is a known user. Stop it already! You have no chance.
                Just admit that you are WROOOONG!
                Yawn. I stopped reading when you said he failed again. Gonna go back, but while you are here hopefully...

                The point is he did NOT fail the 3rd time. So what the hell is your BOOM about.

                When do you think he started drinking. And how did he drink over 5 liters in that time, and was dehydrated for the 2nd test, yet diluted enough to pass the third when it was 733ng.

                Pleas answer. You're gonna get embarrassed again and again and again.

                Comment

                • travestyny
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Sep 2008
                  • 29106
                  • 4,962
                  • 9,405
                  • 4,074,546

                  #868
                  Originally posted by ADP02
                  Correct, Diaz failed before and failed again. History repeats itself ... BOOM!

                  If the urine is diluted enough, the amount of marijuana found would be much less. That is the point of diluting or you still not getting it?

                  "For example, urine cannabinoids levels which were higher than 10,000 ng / ml dropped to the low 100's after drinking 12 ounces of water. After drinking a gallon of water, with or without one of the "cleansing agents" added, it only took an hour for the specific gravity to drop to less than 1.005."

                  BADA-BOOM!

                  Diaz drank 1.5 gallons after a fight. You think he wouldn't try to do the same if he thought that he would test positive. Its a no-brainer.

                  BTW - Why would QUEST LABs have it wrong? This is NOT the first time that they do these type of tests. In fact, for the 2nd time that DIAZ was caught, he got a QUEST expert witness to back him up!!! TRAVESTNY cannot get a break on this one!

                  This guy is a known user. Stop it already! You have no chance.
                  Just admit that you are WROOOONG!
                  Hahahahaha. Say what? Dropped to 1.005???

                  Well you know now that his SPG WAS 1.009!!!!


                  What the **** is wrong with you? Why are you giving info that goes against your stance, dummy??? Lol.

                  Should I even read the rest of your post?

                  Comment

                  • travestyny
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Sep 2008
                    • 29106
                    • 4,962
                    • 9,405
                    • 4,074,546

                    #869
                    Originally posted by adp02
                    "for example, urine cannabinoids levels which were higher than 10,000 ng / ml dropped to the low 100's after drinking 12 ounces of water. [b][i]
                    lmaooooooooo. Oh man. You are done.

                    Review this, then come back and apologize for being so foolish, then bow out and never come back.

                    Comment

                    • Shape up
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Sep 2016
                      • 3123
                      • 64
                      • 0
                      • 35,399

                      #870
                      ?
                      Up

                      The criteria are:

                      The athlete would experience significant health problems without taking the prohibited substance or method;
                      The the****utic use of the substance would not produce significant enhancement of performance;
                      There is no reasonable the****utic alternative to the use of the otherwise prohibited substance or method;
                      The requirement to use that substance or method is not due to the prior use of the substance or method without a TUE which was prohibited at the time of use.

                      For the TUE to be granted, all four criteria must be met.-----------im smashing you like an ant today, and all you can post back is that they CAN give a retro tue but he hasnt met the criteria, drinking water would be a more than reasonable alternative ****head
                      Last edited by Shape up; 10-26-2016, 01:54 AM. Reason: add more

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP