Everyone Wants to Talk About Floyd's IV - What About Pac-Monster's Toradol Abuse???

[ADP02]

Can you stop with the Boom Shlt. It's annoying, especially when you've stated nothing of substance. You are still speculating that the TUEC is crooked, just as you can speculate that the lab is crooked since it is chosen by USADA.

BUT HEY, I don't expect any less from someone who has accused the ref, the judges, NSAC, USADA, WADA, and anyone else plus their momma for Pacquiao's loss. Time for you to get over it.

TUEC = USADA

USADA and Floyd have a relationship. USADA can thank Floyd for getting them in the door as far as boxing goes and Floyd's reps have paid USADA and continue to to this day!

If it was just that BUT that is just the tip of the iceberg. I already pointed out that Floyd didn't require no IV. We were fortunate of seeing him just before and having a ton of data just before. NONE OF IT ADDs UP!!!!

When you go check up WADA, USADA, NSAC studies have to say about IVs and dehydration, well it again does NOT add up.

So to say, I have plenty. YOU HAVE NOTHING!!!! REALLY NOTHING!!! Your comeback is that I do not have Floyd's BS doctor's note even though Floyd thanks Dr Alex Ariza!!!



.

[ADP02]

I am, however, willing to laugh with you about the fact that you just called him **** Diaz . I'm guessing it was a typo? Hoping you don't have **** on your mind. Lol.

Seriously, just a light moment.

Nice catch ... Yup, it was a typo ....

[Shape up]

You still going? Didn't I bury you already?

 All IV infusions and/or injections of more than 50mL (~3.4 tablespoons) per 6 hour period are prohibited at all times, both in- and out-of-competition, except for those legitimately received in the course of hospital admissions, surgical procedures or clinical investigations, without an approved The****utic Use Exemption (TUE).

Get lost, chump. You are clearly the one with reading comprehension problems.

 All IV infusions and/or injections of more than 50mL (~3.4 tablespoons) per 6 hour period are prohibited at all times, both in- and out-of-competition, except for those legitimately received in the course of hospital admissions, surgical procedures or clinical investigations, without an approved The****utic Use Exemption (TUE).

WADA confirmed that under the 2015 World Anti-Doping Code and the International Standard for The****utic Use Exemptions (ISTUE), a retroactive TUE can be granted for an IV drip to combat dehydration.

Learn how to read, then take ya moms **** outta ya mouth, bltch. Thanks.

And the IV was given in floyds lounge room so for that he should already have had a TUE as written in their rules ****head, your as dumb as dog****

[Shape up]

Advisory:

Even if the substance delivered by intravenous infusion is permitted (e.g., iron), the method is prohibited if given outside of a hospital/surgery/ admission/surgery/clinical investigation because it is diluted in more than 50 milliliters of fluid. Intravenous injections of less than 50mL are only prohibited if the substance is included on the prohibited list. ---------------- do you know what " not allowed " means ****head, smashed you like the slug you are nobjockey, THE METHOD IS PROHIBITED OUTSIDE OF THE SPECIFIC PLACES NAMED

[travestyny]

Funny stuff.

I'm NOT wrong when all I'm doing is C/P what ESPN and others reported. You can say that they have it wrong .... I didn't check the video yet:
"The SMRTL tests produced specific gravity readings of 1.003 and 1.006. According to Eichner, "ideal" specific gravity for a urine sample is approximately 1.020. A reading of 1.000 indicates water."


You are using the defense witness to say that I'm wrong and speculating. Well that is wrong actually because all I'm doing is reporting the results. The results point to DIAZ testing positively!

You are speculating that the DEFENSE's witness must be right and there are no other possibilities. Nice try!


Coma? So you are saying that its impossible to drink fluids to dilute because they would be in a coma? Funny stuff. While there is a definite risk involved, lots of people try to dilute their urine in that manner. Unless they cannot get alternatives, its by way of water but either way, the smart way is to include electrolytes at the correct proportion.

Again, you have no idea what Diaz did and speculating. Did he drink water, Electrolytes, IV, Combination of items?



Now for the kicker. You say that someone cannot drink so much or else they would get into a coma.
Well there were witnesses of Diaz doing just that when he was caught the previous time:

"In fact, the NSAC executive director left no mistake about it when he reiterated his claim that Nick Diaz drank 24 bottles of water after his UFC 143 defeat against current interim welterweight champion Carlos Condit. Diaz allegedly did so to cleanse his system before his pre-fight drug test, which resulted in a positive test for marijuana metabolites.

Kizer described the scenario in detail to MiddleEasy, telling them where that news came from:

“
[That story] came from [Diaz] drinking a lot of water afterwards.

Those water bottles were 8-ounce bottles, so 24 bottles is about a gallon-and-a-half if my math is right. I saw what [Diaz] drank. And we know why. And you can play games about it if you want, but we know why."


Here it is .......... BOOM!!!

.

Are you pretending to not be able to follow, or are you really having some difficulty?

Let me state this clearly for you. For Nick Diaz to drop the metabolite level from 733 to 61ng in that amount of time would put his body into serious risk.

Is that clear enough for you, or do you want to accuse me of saying something else I never said just so you can type BOOM at the end of more useless drivel?

There is no need for you to speculate about what he did. WE HAVE THE NUMBERS. 1.009....or did you forget that? So yea, let's ignore that (according to you) he drank an exhorbitant amount of water and his specific gravity was still somehow 1.009.

You just claimed he previously drank over 5 liters of water (though you don't say in what period of time, so let's glance over that, too) and FAILED. So doesn't that tell you he would have to drink A LOT MORE to have passed this test????? (just as the MRO says!)


BOOM! Look who keeps putting his foot in his mouth and digging that grave. It's time for you to bow out.


By the way, I still want you to tell me when you believe he began drinking this water. Please do. I'd love to hear more of your speculation so I can get a good laugh and explain why it makes no sense.

[travestyny]

TUEC = USADA

USADA and Floyd have a relationship. USADA can thank Floyd for getting them in the door as far as boxing goes and Floyd's reps have paid USADA and continue to to this day!

If it was just that BUT that is just the tip of the iceberg. I already pointed out that Floyd didn't require no IV. We were fortunate of seeing him just before and having a ton of data just before. NONE OF IT ADDs UP!!!!

When you go check up WADA, USADA, NSAC studies have to say about IVs and dehydration, well it again does NOT add up.

So to say, I have plenty. YOU HAVE NOTHING!!!! REALLY NOTHING!!! Your comeback is that I do not have Floyd's BS doctor's note even though Floyd thanks Dr Alex Ariza!!!

.

Dude, what you have is a conspiracy theory that the TUEC, WADA, and USADA took money to help Floyd.

It's boring now. If you had anything solid, we wouldn't be the only two fools talking about this.

[travestyny]

And the IV was given in floyds lounge room so for that he should already have had a TUE as written in their rules ****head, your as dumb as dog****

Show me where it says if you want to have an IV in your living room, it may not be a retroactive TUE.

Because I have a direct quote that says a retroactive TUE can be issued to combat dehydration.

You know what that means? WADA SAYS YOU ARE WRONG!

No way of getting around that, idiot. Now go choke on ya moms ****.

[travestyny]

Advisory:

Even if the substance delivered by intravenous infusion is permitted (e.g., iron), the method is prohibited if given outside of a hospital/surgery/ admission/surgery/clinical investigation because it is diluted in more than 50 milliliters of fluid. Intravenous injections of less than 50mL are only prohibited if the substance is included on the prohibited list. ---------------- do you know what " not allowed " means ****head, smashed you like the slug you are nobjockey, THE METHOD IS PROHIBITED OUTSIDE OF THE SPECIFIC PLACES NAMED

Let me give you a hint... if what you say is true, then it is NOT ALLOWED to have an IV over 50ml.

Now, tell me, when are you allowed to have an IV over 50ml? Come on, you can do it, can't you? Tell me when it's allowed.

[Shape up]

 IV infusions during home visits, urgent care or after-hours clinics, boutique IV and rehydration services, and doctor’s office visits are not hospital admissions and would require an approved TUE in advance.------- eat **** ****head

[travestyny]

 IV infusions during home visits, urgent care or after-hours clinics, boutique IV and rehydration services, and doctor’s office visits are not hospital admissions and would require an approved TUE in advance.------- eat **** ****head

WADA confirmed that under the 2015 World Anti-Doping Code and the International Standard for The****utic Use Exemptions (ISTUE), a retroactive TUE can be granted for an IV drip to combat dehydration.


Tell me what you see in red.