Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Everyone Wants to Talk About Floyd's IV - What About Pac-Monster's Toradol Abuse???

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
    Are you serious?

    You answered maybe one question. Please provide the link. As I actually like that its 1.009 Go back and answer .... or were you just trying to spin your way out of this?


    Sorry but its YOU that has not provided anything to counter the ruling. An admitted user gets caught cheating.

    Expert under oath: You just do not get it. Sad stuff.
    All you have is an "expert" defense witness. Go watch some cases. They always have at least 1 expert witness per side. Not that its not truthful .... They usually present evidence to support their side. I gave you an example of what I saw on 48 hours last night. That "expert" got trapped when cross examined and had to say the truth. BOOM!

    Question to the "expert": You say its not possible but do you mean its not possible using the numbers and example that you stated or impossible using all avenues possible when it comes to trying to dilute the urine sample?"

    Expert Witness: Drrrr .... can I do like Diaz and take the 5th?


    Man, just admit that you are WROOOOOONG!!!


    .
    You are a moron. Seriously. When I get home I'll show you proof it was 1.009. Good luck trying to spin that to support your side when it clearly means he was even less hydrated than you thought.

    Seriously, I think you Pac-roaches share a brain.

    And what question do you need answered? I've already torn through all of your bull****. What else do you need?

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Shape up View Post
      You really are illiterate, it clearly states that even if the solution is permissible, the method is prohibited outside of hospital, surgury, I have ****ted smarter crap than what you are nobjockey
      You still going? Didn't I bury you already?

       All IV infusions and/or injections of more than 50mL (~3.4 tablespoons) per 6 hour period are prohibited at all times, both in- and out-of-competition, except for those legitimately received in the course of hospital admissions, surgical procedures or clinical investigations, without an approved The****utic Use Exemption (TUE).

      Get lost, chump. You are clearly the one with reading comprehension problems.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
        You are a moron. Seriously. When I get home I'll show you proof it was 1.009. Good luck trying to spin that to support your side when it clearly means he was even less hydrated than you thought.

        Seriously, I think you Pac-roaches share a brain.

        And what question do you need answered? I've already torn through all of your bull****. What else do you need?
        When you post like this I know that you have no idea what you are talking about or just trying to spin yourself out of it.


        As for your numbers, I'm just asking because the articles on Diaz then are all over the place. If you can find the actual results from the lab that would be great. I know that there is a video of the case that I did watch parts of many months back. That may have the numbers.


        EXAMPLES that you had different:
        "Marijuana metabolites in Diaz’s urine sample were measured at 300 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml), NSAC Executive Director Bob Bennett today confirmed with MMAjunkie. The level is double the 150 ng/mL limit set in 2013 after the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) and NSAC raised its testing threshold."


        "The SMRTL tests produced specific gravity readings of 1.003 and 1.006. According to Eichner, "ideal" specific gravity for a urine sample is approximately 1.020. A reading of 1.000 indicates water.




        I guess this is to be continued ....

        Comment


        • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
          You still going? Didn't I bury you already?

           All IV infusions and/or injections of more than 50mL (~3.4 tablespoons) per 6 hour period are prohibited at all times, both in- and out-of-competition, except for those legitimately received in the course of hospital admissions, surgical procedures or clinical investigations, without an approved The****utic Use Exemption (TUE).

          Get lost, chump. You are clearly the one with reading comprehension problems.


          Floyd did not need an IV and you know it. Just the way you are handling the **** Diaz stuff proves my point.

          If we had a video of Floyd admitting that he used the IV illegally you would still find something to say to protect your hero. Sad stuff!


          Why did someone who fits the below need an IV?:
          - said on the pre-fight form that he was OK
          - vitals sings were normal
          - rock solid weight for a decade
          - rock solid weight for 30 days prior to the fight
          - was drinking regularly at the weigh in
          - admitted not having issues making weight.
          - Did not notify the NSAC about his serious medical condition
          - Lied about why he needed an IV
          - Said he would just relax and just workout "a little bit" to "shake out" and "stay sharp"

          WADA:
          "It must be understood that the use of IV fluid replacement following exercise to correct mild to moderate dehydration is not clinically indicated nor substantiated by the medical literature. There is a well-established body of scientific evidence to confirm that oral rehydration is the preferred the****utic choice, potentially even more effective than IV infusion."


          USADA
          guidelines for proper hydration
          •Monitor fluid losses: Weigh-in before and after training, especially during hot weather and conditioning phases of the season
          •For each pound lost during exercise, drink three cups of fluid

          Comment


          • Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
            When you post like this I know that you have no idea what you are talking about or just trying to spin yourself out of it.


            As for your numbers, I'm just asking because the articles on Diaz then are all over the place. If you can find the actual results from the lab that would be great. I know that there is a video of the case that I did watch parts of many months back. That may have the numbers.


            EXAMPLES that you had different:
            "Marijuana metabolites in Diaz’s urine sample were measured at 300 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml), NSAC Executive Director Bob Bennett today confirmed with MMAjunkie. The level is double the 150 ng/mL limit set in 2013 after the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) and NSAC raised its testing threshold."


            "The SMRTL tests produced specific gravity readings of 1.003 and 1.006. According to Eichner, "ideal" specific gravity for a urine sample is approximately 1.020. A reading of 1.000 indicates water.




            I guess this is to be continued ....
            I post the way I do because you are a phony who can't admit when you are wrong. Ray Charles can see none of the things you mention make sense, but you keep going. When you are wrong, just admit you are wrong instead of claiming you know more than a medical review officer. For **** sake. None of us here are right all the time, but when you are blatantly wrong and you keep going, it's ****ing annoying.

            I'll find you undeniable evidence of the numbers soon.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
              Floyd did not need an IV and you know it. Just the way you are handling the **** Diaz stuff proves my point.

              If we had a video of Floyd admitting that he used the IV illegally you would still find something to say to protect your hero. Sad stuff!


              Why did someone who fits the below need an IV?:
              - said on the pre-fight form that he was OK
              - vitals sings were normal
              - rock solid weight for a decade
              - rock solid weight for 30 days prior to the fight
              - was drinking regularly at the weigh in
              - admitted not having issues making weight.
              - Did not notify the NSAC about his serious medical condition
              - Lied about why he needed an IV
              - Said he would just relax and just workout "a little bit" to "shake out" and "stay sharp"

              WADA:
              "It must be understood that the use of IV fluid replacement following exercise to correct mild to moderate dehydration is not clinically indicated nor substantiated by the medical literature. There is a well-established body of scientific evidence to confirm that oral rehydration is the preferred the****utic choice, potentially even more effective than IV infusion."


              USADA
              guidelines for proper hydration
              •Monitor fluid losses: Weigh-in before and after training, especially during hot weather and conditioning phases of the season
              •For each pound lost during exercise, drink three cups of fluid
              We been through this. Your defense is that the TUEC is biased and helped him cheat.

              Nice speculation once again.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                Just the way you are handling the **** Diaz stuff proves my point.
                I am, however, willing to laugh with you about the fact that you just called him **** Diaz . I'm guessing it was a typo? Hoping you don't have **** on your mind. Lol.

                Seriously, just a light moment.
                Last edited by travestyny; 10-24-2016, 08:18 AM.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                  You still going? Didn't I bury you already?

                   All IV infusions and/or injections of more than 50mL (~3.4 tablespoons) per 6 hour period are prohibited at all times, both in- and out-of-competition, except for those legitimately received in the course of hospital admissions, surgical procedures or clinical investigations, without an approved The****utic Use Exemption (TUE).

                  Get lost, chump. You are clearly the one with reading comprehension problems.
                  Advisory:

                  Even if the substance delivered by intravenous infusion is permitted (e.g., iron), the method is prohibited if given outside of a hospital/surgery/ admission/surgery/clinical investigation because it is diluted in more than 50 milliliters of fluid. Intravenous injections of less than 50mL are only prohibited if the substance is included on the prohibited list. ---------------- do you know what " not allowed " means ****head, smashed you like the slug you are nobjockey

                  Comment


                  • IV infusions during home visits, urgent care or after-hours clinics, boutique IV and rehydration services, and doctor’s office visits are not hospital admissions and would require an approved TUE in advance.
                    IN ADVANCE ****HEAD

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Shape up View Post
                      IV infusions during home visits, urgent care or after-hours clinics, boutique IV and rehydration services, and doctor’s office visits are not hospital admissions and would require an approved TUE in advance.
                      IN ADVANCE ****HEAD
                      Seriously, can you read? This is a serious question. Can you ****ing read?

                      WADA confirmed that under the 2015 World Anti-Doping Code and the International Standard for The****utic Use Exemptions (ISTUE), a retroactive TUE can be granted for an IV drip to combat dehydration.

                      Now read it again. Then read it again. Then read it one more time.

                      Then go ask your moms to explain it for you. Ya dumb ****.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP