Comments Thread For: Golovkin Would Be Ready For Jacobs in November, December

[Tomjas]

WHO FKN CARES ???

How is that even relevant ?

Who cares who the lead promoter is.

K2/Hearn agreed to split the money fairly, because they both want that fight.

Something that K2 were not willing to do with Saunders.

Some of what you say on this matter is correct but this is way off base.

Fact is that the money isnt there for Saunders as:

a. it's not PPV in the States and HBO are hardly likely to foot a $6 million purse bill on regular; and

b. Boxnation/Warren dont have the same financial clout as Hearn for a UK fight

Only way that I can see it happening is if K2/GGG sign a UK promotional agreement with Hearn and he brings Sky to the table

Mind you, that's also assuming that BJS actually wants to fight someone (and I'm not just referring to GGG here)

[aboutfkntime]

Of course the lead promoter is relevant.

Eddie Hearn is paying Kell Brook from Sky PPV income. No Eddie Hearn, no Sky PPV income.

Well, the lead promoter is relevant, but his name is not.

They could have made a deal with anyone.

K2/Hearn came to a fair agreement, because they both wanted that fight.

No way is 1.5mil the best offer they could have made Saunders.

Golovkin is the draw, not Brook..... so K2 should have offered to split the 97,000 PPV revenue more fairly with Saunders, rather than pull that A-side rubbish..... again.

[aboutfkntime]

Some of what you say on this matter is correct but this is way off base.

Fact is that the money isnt there for Saunders as:

a. it's not PPV in the States and HBO are hardly likely to foot a $6 million purse bill on regular; and

b. Boxnation/Warren dont have the same financial clout as Hearn for a UK fight

Only way that I can see it happening is if K2/GGG sign a UK promotional agreement with Hearn and he brings Sky to the table

Mind you, that's also assuming that BJS actually wants to fight someone (and I'm not just referring to GGG here)

Come on, nobody knew who Lemieux was either.

And surely Golovkin's 2nd PPV would be more successful than his 1st ?

Is Golovkin really a draw..... or what ?

I thought they would be willing to move heaven and earth to get their hands on the missing piece of the puzzle..... the holy grail of middleweight trinkets..... but nope, now Canelo will get it.

Funny

It ABSOLUTELY looks like they wanted to fight Kell Brook waaaaay more than they wanted to fight Saunders.

[Madison Boxing]

Well, the lead promoter is relevant, but his name is not.

They could have made a deal with anyone.

K2/Hearn came to a fair agreement, because they both wanted that fight.

No way is 1.5mil the best offer they could have made Saunders.

Golovkin is the draw, not Brook..... so K2 should have offered to split the 97,000 PPV revenue more fairly with Saunders, rather than pull that A-side rubbish..... again.

another ggg thread, another thread in which you are talking out of your arse. Why is saunders suddenly some killer that GGG is avoiding ffs, you really think GGG would struggle with him? GGG v brook is a far far bigger event over here than GGG v saunders would be. And saundrs has said in interview before that he wants nothing to do with golovkin, but now you are naive enough to think its just cause they werent offered enoug money. Anyone with a brain cell knows hes staying undefeated until he gets that eubank rematch for mega money in UK

[TripleGFightFan]

Brook was the guy all along.

GGG is afraid of Ward..

That much is true...

[TripleGFightFan]

another ggg thread, another thread in which you are talking out of your arse. Why is saunders suddenly some killer that GGG is avoiding ffs, you really think GGG would struggle with him? GGG v brook is a far far bigger event over here than GGG v saunders would be. And saundrs has said in interview before that he wants nothing to do with golovkin, but now you are naive enough to think its just cause they werent offered enoug money. Anyone with a brain cell knows hes staying undefeated until he gets that eubank rematch for mega money in UK

And that's what it is...Saunders isn't ****** and knows he gets creamed by triple g...and canelo...he already beat eubank so he has a much a higher chance of defeating him again as supposed to triple g who would murder him...

[HeroBando]

Of course the lead promoter is relevant.

Eddie Hearn is paying Kell Brook from Sky PPV income. No Eddie Hearn, no Sky PPV income.

Why do you still bother with that insect? You can't reason with someone with a room temp is, it's just not gonna work

[kafkod]

Brook was the guy all along.

GGG is afraid of Ward..

No ... you are afraid of GGG.

[MelanKomas]

All i know is Golovkin will look like Nate Campbell if he comes with the lazy D against Jacobs. As a GGG fan worrying stuff to see him take punches against guys like monroe and Wade. Jacobs>Lemiuex. I 100% back GGG but Jacobs is no joke, toughest opponent to date.

[aboutfkntime]

another ggg thread, another thread in which you are talking out of your arse. Why is saunders suddenly some killer that GGG is avoiding ffs, you really think GGG would struggle with him? GGG v brook is a far far bigger event over here than GGG v saunders would be. And saundrs has said in interview before that he wants nothing to do with golovkin, but now you are naive enough to think its just cause they werent offered enoug money. Anyone with a brain cell knows hes staying undefeated until he gets that eubank rematch for mega money in UK

it is a public execution LMAO

the fact remains, no way is 1.5mil the best offer that they could have made Saunders..... it is your job to explain why, not mine

Golovkin is not fixated with 160, he knows that history will record him as the best middleweight since 2014 - which is why he keeps talking about money-fights at 154/168.....

..... he wants Hopkins record for successful defences, which is why they went to great lengths to petition the WBA to sanction this fight.....

Golovkin is ALL about risk/reward, his track-record proves that..... Brook is a much easier fight, and now GGG gets yet another "defence" LMAO


Your problem is this..... is it plainly obvious that they could have offered Saunders more than 1.5mil..... THAT is your problem.