Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The biggest schooling a prime Top 3 P4P received?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
    It was widely believed he was one of the 3 best fighters in the world even if he was past prime. Mayweather has been past prime the last 5 years but he was still P4P #1. P4P is opinion, if it's nonsense then every you think is nonsense also.
    Isn't it insane how such recent history can be revised so much?

    The Mosley fight was 6 years ago. Not long ago. Feels like yesterday to be honest.

    After he beat the ever lovwrong **** out of "The most feared man in Boxing" Margarito he was considered to be extremely dangerous.

    P4P top 3 on any list you can find.

    When Shane got in the ring after the Marquez fight and challenged Floyd, so many people said Floyd was ducking him and would never fight him. Not just fans on here, the media, boxing people etc etc etc.

    Fast forward to today and we've got people saying Mosley wasn't top 10, Mosley only ranked their because it was The Ring Magazine, Margarito wasn't top 10 when he beat him.

    It's crazy man.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali View Post
      I don't see how you can use chavez but not roy jones...

      Roy was still considered the best fighter in the world at the time, and everybody thought he would "montel" tarver in the rematch..

      Half the dudes on your own poll were past it..

      Donaire,,, what's he done since

      Chavez,,

      Mosely was never the same after forrest, afterwards basically lost every big fight besides margarito


      Tyson and toney are the only guys that were actually at their peak
      Well I already said on the OP that Chavez was arguably passed it if you read it.

      Donaire's another arguable one.

      Mosley wasn't prime when he fought Forresst? Ok that one I've never heard before.

      All of the above were closer to their primes than Roy Jones was anyway. Fact of the matter is he wasn't in his prime it's really that simple.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by LoadedWraps View Post
        I voted for Tyson's loss to Douglas, because not only is it a major loss in his prime, but also a major upset.

        If Ward beats Kovalev or vica versa, it's a great win for either but not an upset no matter who wins.

        Duran/SRL is missing from this poll, as someone already mentioned.

        Also, I disagree with you saying JMM wasn't prime when Floyd beat him Irondamhanza. And please don't point at age as a rebuttal, age doesn't tell you when a fighter is in his prime at all, and not all fighters enter/leave their prime around the same time in their careers either. JMM didn't lose a beat until his second to last Manny fight IMO. I would have to see overwhelming evidence otherwise, evidence in previous fights and training camps.
        Marquez was arguably at his peak age wise but at Welterweight he definitely wasn't at his peak weight. His first fight there also.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
          Well I already said on the OP that Chavez was arguably passed it if you read it.

          Donaire's another arguable one.

          Mosley wasn't prime when he fought Forresst? Ok that one I've never heard before.

          All of the above were closer to their primes than Roy Jones was anyway. Fact of the matter is he wasn't in his prime it's really that simple.
          Mosely was pretty much on top of the world but really hadn't looked good in any of his welter defenses after beating Oscar...

          Roy was still recognized as the best fighter on the planet. He was more highly regarded at the time of his defeat than anyone on the poll

          Comment


          • I took into account the following aspects of the fights in the poll:

            Weight shinanigans (was someone weight drained, was someone dragged down or up, did the loser belong in another weight class)

            Was it 50-50, or was one of them better

            Was there any external issues going on in the loser's life (an underrated aspect of boxing)

            In this case I picked Rigondeaux vs Donaire

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali View Post
              Mosely was pretty much on top of the world but really hadn't looked good in any of his welter defenses after beating Oscar...

              Roy was still recognized as the best fighter on the planet. He was more highly regarded at the time of his defeat than anyone on the poll
              What does that matter? The thread specifies prime and P4P #1 or not it's clear Roy wasn't in his prime.

              Mayweather was higher regarded than all of them in 2015 he was still way passed his prime.

              If a fighter "not looking good" is basis for not being prime then has anyone ever been in their prime?

              Toney looked like **** against Sosa, Nunn, Johnson and Tiberi in the lead up to the Jones fight was he in his prime?

              If Mosley wasn't in his prime in 2002 then I think that's news to everyone.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by -Kev- View Post
                I took into account the following aspects of the fights in the poll:

                Weight shinanigans (was someone weight drained, was someone dragged down or up, did the loser belong in another weight class)

                Was it 50-50, or was one of them better

                Was there any external issues going on in the loser's life (an underrated aspect of boxing)

                In this case I picked Rigondeaux vs Donaire
                Out of interest, which fights do you think these apply to?

                Outside of Tyson-Douglas being the obvious one.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
                  What does that matter? The thread specifies prime and P4P #1 or not it's clear Roy wasn't in his prime.

                  Mayweather was higher regarded than all of them in 2015 he was still way passed his prime.

                  If a fighter "not looking good" is basis for not being prime then has anyone ever been in their prime?

                  Toney looked like **** against Sosa, Nunn, Johnson and Tiberi in the lead up to the Jones fight was he in his prime?

                  If Mosley wasn't in his prime in 2002 then I think that's news to everyone.
                  That's fine, if you don't want to include roy

                  Regardless, if it's not that fight, then I gotta go with tyson-buster.. Biggest upset in the history of sports, humiliating one-sided beating and ko from a journeymen.Even the tyson corner was embarrassing.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali View Post
                    That's fine, if you don't want to include roy

                    Regardless, if it's not that fight, then I gotta go with tyson-buster.. Biggest upset in the history of sports, humiliating one-sided beating and ko from a journeymen.Even the tyson corner was embarrassing.
                    And Tyson was bizarrely ahead on the cards too.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
                      And Tyson was bizarrely ahead on the cards too.
                      Don King baby..

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP