Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why is Broner criticized yet GGG praised?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • cauz broner is outspoken so people don't like him.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by chris232 View Post
      25-6 barkley, 40-9 malinga, lost to collins twice, 32-8 robbie simms at york hall ffs, mclellan was a bum, fought someone 28-16 the fight before last. What an absolutely amazing set of opponents. Talk about viewing past fighters with rose tinted glasses lol. Can pick and choose a number of fighters on ggg's record who are no worse then that load of ****e. Benn and eubank never dominated a division over a number of years, GGG has destroyed every single fighter hes fought, never been down in almost 400 combined amateur and pro fights.
      welp....wont be taking you seriously here on out

      watch the fights instead of going to boxrec

      dont be lazy and watch the fights

      Benn was wrecking guys and was an even bigger one punch hitter than GGG, he got better with time whereas GGG had that great amatuer pedigree

      when he developed Benn became a force at 160-168

      Comment


      • Originally posted by PivotandRoll View Post
        And Michael Watson and others you wouldn't know. Chris was also bigger, faster, better defense,hits harder with an iron chin that GGG wouldn't have dented in the slightest.
        Such a good chin that calzaghe knocked him down. Yes you are correct, i wouldnt know a lot of them cause a lot of them were nobodies.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by chris232 View Post
          25-6 barkley, 40-9 malinga, lost to collins twice, 32-8 robbie simms at york hall ffs, mclellan was a bum, fought someone 28-16 the fight before last. What an absolutely amazing set of opponents. Talk about viewing past fighters with rose tinted glasses lol. Can pick and choose a number of fighters on ggg's record who are no worse then that load of ****e. Benn and eubank never dominated a division over a number of years, GGG has destroyed every single fighter hes fought, never been down in almost 400 combined amateur and pro fights.
          Oh so you're a fanboy.....How pathetic....


          No Benn and Eubank didn't dominate in the Era of Hopkins, Jones, Toney, Griffin, Littles.... Most of this was at 168 though.... Where GGG somehow fights Kell Brook instead of James Degale. Degale is Hearn too btw and would have taken that offer

          Comment


          • Originally posted by chris232 View Post
            Such a good chin that calzaghe knocked him down. Yes you are correct, i wouldnt know a lot of them cause a lot of them were nobodies.
            SO we count fights were the guy is a shell of himself to shamelessly promote our agenda?? like I said....Fanboy

            Cotto must get loads of credit for blasting out Martinez off you right

            Comment


            • Originally posted by el*** View Post
              GGG is 34 and has yet to fight anyone as good as porter or maidana.

              i agree with this, but there's quite a caveat when you consider that those guys beat broner clearly, and golovkin is the most dominant fighter in boxing right now. broner looked spectacular / dominant at 130 and 135. also had a massive advantage in natural size. looked ordinary when he got to 140 and 147. i wonder why?


              do we credit broner for wins he didn't get because they're better than anytbody golovkin fought?


              when you look at a resume, rank a fighter, etc, you don't credit him for his losses . you ask "who did he beat and when?"

              in broner's case his best win may very well be antonio freaking demarco, a much smaller but decent fighter, and the best fighter he's actually beaten was probably an aging paulie malignaggi at welterweight.


              when you consider wins, which is what really matters on a resume, golovkin's the better fighter. no losses, nevermind getting a beating from marcos maidana. nevermind a clear loss to shawn porter at a catchweight. wins that fit right in with the antonio demarcos and aging paulie's of the world. and they're back to back for several years, all via knockout. his resume is better than broners. at the very least, they're comparable.


              but you have moneyteamers / team broners hyping broner, and crapping on golokvin. i wonder why ?

              Comment


              • Originally posted by therealpugilist View Post
                welp....wont be taking you seriously here on out

                watch the fights instead of going to boxrec

                dont be lazy and watch the fights

                Benn was wrecking guys and was an even bigger one punch hitter than GGG, he got better with time whereas GGG had that great amatuer pedigree

                when he developed Benn became a force at 160-168
                dont be lazy and watch the fights lol, yeah going to cancel work tomorrow so i can sit through all of benns fights. Alright bum was an exaggeration but he wasnt some world beater was he, as i said a lot of these fighters from the past get made out to be amazing when they werent, laughable that im being made out to be the crazy one by you two clowns for thinking golovkin (unanimously considered either 1st,2nd ,3rd in world p4p) is better than benn and eubank, two solid but limited fighters who were nowhere near any P4P lists

                Comment


                • Originally posted by PivotandRoll View Post
                  SO we count fights were the guy is a shell of himself to shamelessly promote our agenda?? like I said....Fanboy

                  Cotto must get loads of credit for blasting out Martinez off you right
                  a chin doesnt change that much. hopkins and toneys chins were fine well into there 40's.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by chris232 View Post
                    25-6 barkley, 40-9 malinga, lost to collins twice, 32-8 robbie simms at york hall ffs, mclellan was a bum, fought someone 28-16 the fight before last. What an absolutely amazing set of opponents. Talk about viewing past fighters with rose tinted glasses lol. Can pick and choose a number of fighters on ggg's record who are no worse then that load of ****e. Benn and eubank never dominated a division over a number of years, GGG has destroyed every single fighter hes fought, never been down in almost 400 combined amateur and pro fights.
                    Barkley has wins over Hearns you fool. And Collins had Roy Jones second guessing a fight...Not BJS ffs.

                    McClellan only has two wins over Julian Jackson.

                    Does it not get old spouting this crap?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by PivotandRoll View Post
                      Oh so you're a fanboy.....How pathetic....


                      No Benn and Eubank didn't dominate in the Era of Hopkins, Jones, Toney, Griffin, Littles.... Most of this was at 168 though.... Where GGG somehow fights Kell Brook instead of James Degale. Degale is Hearn too btw and would have taken that offer
                      and thats my point, all these great fighters and eubank and benn didnt fight them. Cause they formed there own domestic circuit with watson and collins, all fighting each other and avoiding the true world class fighters

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP