Why is Broner criticized yet GGG praised?

[BillyBoxing]

thanks for acknowledging I give facts whether you like them or not


news flash...A 30+ year old campaigning in his 4th and 5th weight class is not prime either, unless you think mayweather is some black highlander lol


get out of your feelings

Mayweather was clearly the best of his generation and recieved more criticism than any fighter I have ever seen in my life

Sorry bro...GGG is not immune to criticism, especially when the same people trashed mayweather give GGG a pass and make excuses why he hasnt took any risks

Floyd wanted it both ways, call himself the TBE and fight for the money (not his legacy) that's why he's getting so much criticism.

GGG is not immune to criticism but what the problem with him?

You don't think he's the best 160 pounders?

GGG does not call himself TBE, nobody does, he's a lineal champion doing his things, and KO his opponents and is a genuine decent guy.
you Flyd fans bash him and I just don't know why, there is some bitter jealousy coming from yall.

GGG is liked because he is a likable guy with a fan friendly style, get over it,Floyd wanted to play the villain and safety first, he is seen as a safety first villain...Plain and simple

[Kazakh Thunder]

GGG>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Broner

[Oldschool5]

I believe it's called "character "

[therealpugilist]

Floyd wanted it both ways, call himself the TBE and fight for the money (not his legacy) that's why he's getting so much criticism.

GGG is not immune to criticism but what the problem with him?

You don't think he's the best 160 pounders?

GGG does not call himself TBE, nobody does, he's a lineal champion doing his things, and KO his opponents and is a genuine decent guy.
you Flyd fans bash him and I just don't know why, there is some bitter jealousy coming from yall.

GGG is liked because he is a likable guy with a fan friendly style, get over it,Floyd wanted to play the villain and safety first, he is seen as a safety first villain...Plain and simple

mayweather can call himself whatever he wants, its called self belief, he wouldnt have made where he has without it...ali called himself the greatest...who cares what a man calls themselves...its up to the opponents to shut him up and they couldnt

jealousy over what? all I said was ggg is a good fighter he just needs to fight better opposition. he isnt p4p until he beats elite fighters, thats how it has always been...cant change the goal posts because a fighter you like doesnt measure up

[Clayton Bigsby]

This thread is as dumb as its creator. Listen here boy...you're lucky I can't see, else I'd be upside your big a$$ head for posting dumb ****

[PivotandRoll]

Who cares?
About the same level.
I rate Paulie at best as a B- fighter (Hatton and Kahn ruined him and they barely are A fighters), Ouma was a C+ fighter, not far from Paulie level tough.

Ouma was tough and to GGG's credit, he was the first man to stop him.

The good thing about Paulie is he's a durable guy who can come back from hard beatings, most fighters can't.




LOL, where is the lie? A lie because it doesn't fit your agenda?

He was 21 when he fought Ponce, he obviously been growing up since.
Do you think he could still make 135?Let alone 130?





You don't hate GGG but you're obviously coming in everythread related to him shtting on him.



Molina is himself terrible.



Nobody said he's a perfect fighter, he's doing things in the ring, shifting, cutting off the ring most elite fighters can't do anymore.



Same list?



I don't hate Broner, I just think he's an idiot, but I was embarassed when Maidana slapped him, so I guess I don't hate him.
Also said it was ****** for him to jump to 147, he had no business at this weight.

I just hate when people compare him to GGG who is a much more serious fighter, always in shape and at the right weight.

Lst point : so GGG needs a Lara to look bad, Broner Paulie, agreed

I care when you say GGG is miles better yet got hit WAY more against Ouma than Broner did against Paulie.

It is a lie! Broner is a fatass no? Big fat chubby cheeks? How can he have big puffy cheeks and not be too heavy? He could make 135 though it might not be healthy at this stage unless he went down slowly. But he is what 5'7 at most? He's just lazy.

The plus minus list for punches landed and punches taken. http://www.boxingscene.com/compubox-...eakdown--99944 here is the latest one I could find.

Yes I think GGG is a good enough fighter that it would take someone of the level of Lara to frustrate him. The only fighters I think can beat him at 160 and below are : Floyd, Brook, Cotto and BJS and then I think it's a huge ask for all of them. Like I've said, I don't dislike GGG. I dislike peoples lack of perception of levels. For instance, I think a true top level Middleweight like Chris Eubank Sr would have handled GGG with ease.

[Madison Boxing]

ggg hasnt ever had the **** beat out of him like broner did v maidana and porter, thats quite a big difference. Couple that with broner struggling against a shot malignaggi and the fact hes a scumbag.

[Madison Boxing]

I care when you say GGG is miles better yet got hit WAY more against Ouma than Broner did against Paulie.

It is a lie! Broner is a fatass no? Big fat chubby cheeks? How can he have big puffy cheeks and not be too heavy? He could make 135 though it might not be healthy at this stage unless he went down slowly. But he is what 5'7 at most? He's just lazy.

The plus minus list for punches landed and punches taken. http://www.boxingscene.com/compubox-...eakdown--99944 here is the latest one I could find.

Yes I think GGG is a good enough fighter that it would take someone of the level of Lara to frustrate him. The only fighters I think can beat him at 160 and below are : Floyd, Brook, Cotto and BJS and then I think it's a huge ask for all of them. Like I've said, I don't dislike GGG. I dislike peoples lack of perception of levels. For instance, I think a true top level Middleweight like Chris Eubank Sr would have handled GGG with ease.

chris eubank sr lmao. thats funniest thing ive seen all day. At least you could have said james toney or someone like that lol. Am a saunders fan but jesus you are crazy if you think he beats golovkin, didnt he just sc**** past john ryder and eubank jr at british level lol. and you criticise others for lack of perceptiom

[j0zef]

I care when you say GGG is miles better yet got hit WAY more against Ouma than Broner did against Paulie.

It is a lie! Broner is a fatass no? Big fat chubby cheeks? How can he have big puffy cheeks and not be too heavy? He could make 135 though it might not be healthy at this stage unless he went down slowly. But he is what 5'7 at most? He's just lazy.

The plus minus list for punches landed and punches taken. http://www.boxingscene.com/compubox-...eakdown--99944 here is the latest one I could find.

Yes I think GGG is a good enough fighter that it would take someone of the level of Lara to frustrate him. The only fighters I think can beat him at 160 and below are : Floyd, Brook, Cotto and BJS and then I think it's a huge ask for all of them. Like I've said, I don't dislike GGG. I dislike peoples lack of perception of levels. For instance, I think a true top level Middleweight like Chris Eubank Sr would have handled GGG with ease.

Why are you comparing Golovkin vs. Ouma to Paulie vs. Broner?

Golovkin outlasted Ouma on no sleep and put him in the hospital, while possibly losing 1-3 rounds.. while Broner got a controversial decision against Paulie. That was also Golovkin's 2nd fight under Abel Sanchez.
Today's version of a healthy Golovkin destroys Ouma in 2 rounds.

As for "getting hit way more", that's a false statement as well. According to records I could find, Paulie landed 214/843 (25%) on Broner, while Ouma landed 225/932 (24%) on Golovkin.

[kafkod]

Broner is 26 and is 5-2 against current or former world champions and has won titles in 4 different divisions....GGG is 34 and only 3-0 against current or former world champions and thats in 1 division....Please explain

Because becoming a unified champ in one division is more difficult to achieve and earns a fighter more respect than winning titles in different divisions by cherry picking the weakest belt holders.