Originally posted by ////
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Ryabinsky: WADA Has Ruled, Certified Povetkin as Clean
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by //// View PostI told the entire forum this would happen over and over and got buried in red K and insults.
It's called reading the actual rules instead of listening to Lou Dibella tweets...
Povetkin did nothing illegal at all. Read the ****ing rules...
It seems more like you took your stance based on an anti-Wilder or pro-Povetkin platform, more so than being objective. The facts of the case just happened to fall on your side of the court..
However, if this is true of WADA then you were right all along, no matter the agenda behind it all
Comment
-
Originally posted by j0zef View PostYour grammar is "full of inaccuracy". Try to argue with facts.
And I'm not apologizing for anything. Don't even like Povetkin. But you idiots keep making up **** to discredit fighters you don't like or are of a different race / country.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Crazylegs77 View Postwow, how shocking. you mean the people who comprise wada are rational people who look at facts? They didnt sit around saying why he taking heart medicine doe? Why the test says .07 micrograms if he didnt take it yesterday?
Wilder and his team were very quick to jump the gun and shout cheater while ignoring the facts. Fight should have just been postponed while they cleared this up. Lucky for Chris Arreola I guess.
You will still have morons argue in case of Povetkin being caught doping when he clearly wasnt anyone who actually took the time to see what's what wouldn't have argued it in the first place !
Yes ppl Povetkin is cleared ....move on !
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ray* View PostYou sound like an apologist mate, excuses, using race and nationality and all that rubbish. I don't give a toss who you are, what colour you are, what nationality you are. I don't make excuses for drug cheats. From Pederson to Povetkin I go in on them. You can make all the excuses all you want, accuse people of discrediting drug cheats all you want but it doesn't change what they did. He does NOT have a heart defect but he was taking that same drug... Hmmm again ZERO excuse. Man is a drug cheat (Legal in 1916 or not)
Comment
Comment