Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Ryabinsky: WADA Has Ruled, Certified Povetkin as Clean

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
    You don't know that's the case, has VADA/WADA said that is the case? Or is that your case?
    Did you not read Goodman's reports sent to ESPN and the WBC? They said that Povetkin tested negative 3 times and failed his 4th, which is evidence for recent use...not how much...Because after testing negative, how much is irrelevant...Just common sense.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Sugarhitman View Post
      Did you not read Goodman's reports sent to ESPN and the WBC? They said that Povetkin tested negative 3 times and failed his 4th, which is evidence for recent use...not how much...Because after testing negative, how much is irrelevant...Just common sense.
      Did VADA or WADA say that they are looking in to that specifically? Or are you just guessing? You don't know how detectable it is so your opinion isn't really worth ****.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
        It's only been announced by WADA today. VADA follows WADA rules, Povetkin will be cleared by VADA.
        So you're saying Margaret Goodman couldn't figure out 70 nanograms was not a "positive test" and was more than previous tests? Hmmmmm

        under 100 nanograms equals the first three tests correct?

        so that means the 4th test was above 100 nanograms or less like the supposed "70?"

        the nature of inconsistencies and professional doctors staying quiet, particularly CEOs from Anti-Doping Agencies such as VADA...

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Sugarhitman View Post
          WADA codes specifically says the burden of proof is on the athlete....The temporary limit is for those who failed their initial tests, not those who fail in between testing, or WADA will be forced to accept that theyre basically tolerating microdosing...and they wont.


          Povetkin's case is not how much was in his system, his case is how did Meldonium show up after passing 3 tests.
          No its not. If he doped after those tests then the concentration would be higher.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by _Maxi View Post
            Eh... yes. And some google doesn't hurt you know?
            Shut it cunt. No one asked you.

            Comment


            • #66
              Meldonium just became the only drug to stay in your system for 6 months.

              Cong**** on the new record

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
                Did VADA or WADA say that they are looking in to that specifically? Or are you just guessing? You don't know how detectable it is so your opinion isn't really worth ****.
                Youre not very bright eh? If the amount found was the focus, Goodman would have made that point in her report...The concern in her report was Povetkin testing negative 3 times and failing his 4th...i.e. not how much...because failing after passing 3 tests is a no brainer....Povetkin consumed the drug after the ban...And if VADA exonerates Povetkin then they will basically be admitting they are supporting microdosing....Wont happen.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Wow.......

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by gioberi View Post
                    No its not. If he doped after those tests then the concentration would be higher.
                    Not when you factor in flushing techniques....Even that wont save him...as WADA says the mere presence of the drug is a violation...It has allowed a grace period for those who failed their initial tests until the excretion studies are finished...not those who pass and then fail which is strong evidence of consumption after the ban.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Sugarhitman View Post
                      Youre not very bright eh? If the amount found was the focus, Goodman would have made that point in her report...The concern in her report was Povetkin testing negative 3 times and failing his 4th...i.e. not how much...because failing after passing 3 tests is a no brainer....Povetkin consumed the drug after the ban...And if VADA exonerates Povetkin then they will basically be admitting they are supporting microdosing....Wont happen.
                      It might be hard to detect or the first 3 weren't tested for it etc which explains the first 3 tests. Again...... you aren't a ped expert and don't know what you're talking about so your opinion doesn't really mean ****.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP