[SMH] I'm Tired of Cats Disrespecting Fury and Not Giving Him a Fair Shake!!

[MisterPullman]

Still salty about him beating your hero like it was a sparring session

Do you know what's going on with the rematch? They're rescheduling right?

[LacedUp]

Do you know what's going on with the rematch? They're rescheduling right?

September/October I believe.

[MisterPullman]

September/October I believe.

Smfh.

I lost interest in this fight. If fury KO'd Wlad or at least beats his ass this time... I'll have a lot more hope

[JAB5239]

No doubt JAB5239 was one of the guys who claimed that Wlad would KO Fury in the first round.

I think these people just rubbish Fury because he made their predictions for the first fight look ******.

Actually I believe I picked Wlad to stop him in the 5th. That Fury beat him matters not to me as everyone Iknows I'm no big fan of either Klitschko. But not of that changes the points I made.

[Jewish-Reptile]

That's not really what they said though. The UKAD said they don't comment on such things. They did not confirm that there was a case underway. BBBofC to my knowledge hasn't commented yet.

Well, there's a difference between a ban being made public and a ban being given. A ban could easily be given to the Fury's without us knowing it, as we have seen with TT. But that ban would have taken place 15 months ago, and not now. Obviously. And since both have fought under the British license, there's no ban in place which makes it 99% sure that there's no case to be made.

I don't know. I don't think it's the doping agency's role to announce these things - As far as I understand it, they only discuss internally with the board and once the board accepts and gives a ban, the details will be made public on the doping agency's website. I think it's the same procedure either WADA or USADA follows too.

But I certainly don't think that the BBBofC would show any favouritism for Fury as they have shown a continuous bias against him for years on end. Fining him for whatever they could multiple times.

Who's to say their is no ban in place ? Fury has come up positive and and not performed in the UK since he was flagged, just like Thompson. Everything points towards Fury in fact being banned or already served a ban. A gagging order sought from the highest court in the land could be preventing the announcement, not an ongoing investigation.

I think what we're dealing with here is Fury has been found guilty and his legal team see either currently or have already engaged legal action hence the no comment stance of both the doping commission and boxing commission, it sounds to be as though they are bound by silence not to confirm, or else why not simply deny.

They can hide behind a court order as his fans can deny any truth to these rumours. I notice the Mirror have not said any more nor have their been any denials in the papers, just Twitter. I'm fairly certain he is guilty, going by the official statements of everyone involved.

Boente and Wlad must be preparing legal action themselves thus the reason the fight was cancelled, and likely the reason he was in fact unable to compete in the UK after all.

Hopefully Fury is stripped and AJ vs Klitschko comes to fruition.

[Jewish-Reptile]

Fighters can say what they want, it still doesn't change things. Tyson is the champ, he beat the man. But his path there and subsequent issues now don't lend him any credit. Instead of taking about retirement he should be looking to cement a legacy by at least fighting the best around or coming up. He hasn't done that besides old boring Wlad. I'm not sold on his skills, but if he would actually try to fight other top guys he'd be much more credible. Respect for the Wlad win, but old champions fade, decline and lose when they stay around to long. That doesn't make Fury a great fighter, just a fighter with great timing. Should he proceed to fight the best in the division I will be happy to give him his credit as I've done Wlad.

Great post.

I can see why the Fury hardcore and Brits will hate a sprinkling of truth here, pay no attention.

[Jewish-Reptile]

Do you know what's going on with the rematch? They're rescheduling right?

Laced up is a journalist, not that you would believe it. Although he can be a good source for boxing news courtesy of boxing scene as not a day goes by he fails to log in, his biased opinionated views he is incapable of being able to discuss British fighters through some fan boy lusting horribly corrupted by national favouritism. Peculiar ? Yes, we're all of the same view, you wouldn't be alone.

[Jewish-Reptile]

***ish brainwashing doe

And still his fans believe he is the victim. Smh.

[LacedUp]

Who's to say their is no ban in place ? Fury has come up positive and and not performed in the UK since he was flagged, just like Thompson. Everything points towards Fury in fact being banned or already served a ban. A gagging order sought from the highest court in the land could be preventing the announcement, not an ongoing investigation.

I think what we're dealing with here is Fury has been found guilty and his legal team see either currently or have already engaged legal action hence the no comment stance of both the doping commission and boxing commission, it sounds to be as though they are bound by silence not to confirm, or else why not simply deny.

They can hide behind a court order as his fans can deny any truth to these rumours. I notice the Mirror have not said any more nor have their been any denials in the papers, just Twitter. I'm fairly certain he is guilty, going by the official statements of everyone involved.

Boente and Wlad must be preparing legal action themselves thus the reason the fight was cancelled, and likely the reason he was in fact unable to compete in the UK after all.

Hopefully Fury is stripped and AJ vs Klitschko comes to fruition.

Fury has fought under British license, scheduled a fight & Hughie has fought multiple times.

So a lot says there's no ban

[Jewish-Reptile]

Fury has fought under British license, scheduled a fight & Hughie has fought multiple times.

So a lot says there's no ban

Why is you believe the British commission and doping injury are declining comment at present then ? You believe they are not bound by silence due to a legal team placing an enforced silence or they simply decline comment bound out of loyalty like yourself to a fellow Brit?