well thats a given arum not really telling us anything we dont know. both guys can box but the reason they are so good is their power. ggg and even kovalev have boxing skill ggg more but nothing like loma but thats not really anything against ggg or kov its just loma is smaller and hes more of a boxer then hunter
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Arum: Golovkin, Kovalev Don't Have Lomachenko's Skills
Collapse
-
-
-
-
The way Loma was turning Martinez was special. His footwork and combinations were just beautiful. He's one of the most skilled guys we've had in a while. He may be p4p better than both guys already. Lets see him beat Salido first.
Comment
-
Hold the **** on, he's good, but hold on
He is good, but people confuse speed and skill. This guy is hardly tested even fought yet. Pro I mean. I'm not ready to put him up there after a few good fights.
Originally posted by yoshik View PostYou are the dumbest SOB ever to post on this thread.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by aldo5408 View PostSo what? That's because loma is moving up and takin challenges. Unlike gg who is hiding behind "I want to unify only bullshtt"
It's harder maybe to be IBF, WBC, IBO, WBA unified in a very same division, than grabbing WBO PAPER BELTS in 3 different divisions.
The shame is GGG won his WBC belt without fighting but not his fault.
Will you be happy if GGG moves up but Jack and De Gale duck him like Martinez,Nelo and Jacobs did at 160 and ends up beating ***in old Sturm for th WBA Belt then mandos and US police men?
Too much of that multiple "division champ" adding paper belts like Broner or Burns, or worst, Paulie who never made the TOP 5 of 140 and TOP 10 of 147 but is world champ in those 2 divisions beating N DOU and Senchenko.
I would prefer Loma to stay at 130 and unify, beating Vargas, Corrales, Pedraza, remach Salido than fighting Flanagan for the 135 WBO belt.
What about being a unified champ before you 10th fight if you want to break records...
Better to be a lineal unified champ in 1 cleaned up division (a real best) than being a belt holder in 3 different divisions without ever beating the best(s) in those "multiple" divisions.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JUNIABOY View PostThat's a fair argument to make. Loma could very well be the most skilled of the 3. It's up to the boxing fan to agree or not. I personally believe that Loma lacks the power. You can teach a boxer to become a master of all kinds of skills...but you can't teach power.
Yea, most casual-fans over-rate power.....
" powah " has NEVER been a prerequisite to winning a boxing match.
Originally posted by JUNIABOY View PostKovalev is the most proven of the 3...Loma could be the most skilled of the 3...& GGG is the most dangerous of the 3. Agree or not, that's up to the fan. Could be a great next couple years for boxing fans when these 3 are staying active.
Kovalev is the most-proven..... Loma is the most-skilled and will likely achieve the most, given both his age and his propensity to take on a challenge..... and, Loma is the most dangerous to A/elite opposition, considering his talent/skill-level and pedigree..... Golovkin had done nothing after 7 fights as a pro, Loma is a 2-div champ with world-class victims.
Comment
Comment