It has nothing to do with what I said. He barely got marked up against Froch, Kessler or Dawson, while against Barrera he did get marked up. AND Froch actually landed more punches, and more power punches.
Fair enough.
Two things - one, actually it is tough to consistently look impressive against good, but not elite fighters. Like you say, styles make fights, and it IS hard to look impressive against all types of fighters.
And two, I'm not dumbing anything down. I'm working with what actually happened. Golovkin was also in a contract dispute. Did you see anyone appoint him P4P #1 in 2012?
The fact is that Ward hasn't fought a good fighter in 4-5 years. Half a decade is an age for an athlete.
Let's not get into the argument of Barrera vs. Wade. Like I said, Barrera is better, but lets not pretend that there's a chasm between them.
The whole P4P argument is garbage today IMO. There's nobody who deserves a spot on a P4P list strictly by their accomplishments. Look at ESPN.
Kovalev's resume is actually not impressive if you look at it objectively. 50 year old Hopkins? Blah.
Golovkin's resume? Not impressive.
Ward's resume? Overrated (don't go crazy).
Roman? Good, but not amazing. His best win was Estrada.. but Estrada was only 22 when they fought. Plus Roman got rocked a few times in his last 2 fights.
Canelo resume? Good, but he's always had a big size advantage.
Crawford? Lame... until the Postol clash.
Rigo probably has best resume of the bunch, but he's been inactive like Ward and tastes the mat in almost every fight.
Bradley got his ass kicked decisively by a guy who actually belonged on a P4P list (pac)
Estrada - who knows. When he fights Roman next year we'll see.
Cotto? I like him, but he lost every big fight he's been in.
if you hadnt lost since your peach fuzz started coming in, you'd have high expectations for yourself. What great fighter ever gives themselves an A anyway? lets be serious. A perfectionist, like Ward, will break down everything in detail
its not hard to look impressive when you dont fight elite competition. We all know Ward has finally started fighting more so trying to dumb it down to the last 3 years knowing he only fought a few times is kinda ******. come on man.
And two, I'm not dumbing anything down. I'm working with what actually happened. Golovkin was also in a contract dispute. Did you see anyone appoint him P4P #1 in 2012?
The fact is that Ward hasn't fought a good fighter in 4-5 years. Half a decade is an age for an athlete.
styles make fights. A win is a win when it is dominant. Kayoing a no name is not no more impressive than outboxing one. Wade didnt belong in the ring with GGG, Barrera was a better opponent for ward because he was a true light heavyweight and more dangerous opponent.
The whole P4P argument is garbage today IMO. There's nobody who deserves a spot on a P4P list strictly by their accomplishments. Look at ESPN.
Kovalev's resume is actually not impressive if you look at it objectively. 50 year old Hopkins? Blah.
Golovkin's resume? Not impressive.
Ward's resume? Overrated (don't go crazy).
Roman? Good, but not amazing. His best win was Estrada.. but Estrada was only 22 when they fought. Plus Roman got rocked a few times in his last 2 fights.
Canelo resume? Good, but he's always had a big size advantage.
Crawford? Lame... until the Postol clash.
Rigo probably has best resume of the bunch, but he's been inactive like Ward and tastes the mat in almost every fight.
Bradley got his ass kicked decisively by a guy who actually belonged on a P4P list (pac)
Estrada - who knows. When he fights Roman next year we'll see.
Cotto? I like him, but he lost every big fight he's been in.

Comment