Cotto vs Canelo -- My Thoughts
Collapse
-
they didnt, at leats not to me... they both missed many punches but cotto missed more and was clear, one had the jab as his main weapon, the other had the power punches...Comment
-
Cotto vs Pac 2 would easily do 2mill PPV's. Why wouldn't Pac want that rematch at 154 if supposedly he nullified it against Margarito just a tad south of the catch? My point is Cotto is still an elite and now bandwagoned of hate underrated fighter because people have focused on 160 yet don'T follow years before...Comment
-
GGG vs Stevens was his best jab bout. Lemieux? on that bandwagon huh? Just watch the Stevens bout and thank me later. I don't think you know what good stiff jab is...Comment
-
Also if you are calling it a "bandwagon" it means you are disagreeing with everyone else. I'm sorry to tell you but that most likely means you are wrong. Your knowledge and rep on here seals that deal.Comment
-
Comment
-
I honestly had Cotto winning by a round but a draw or Canelo by one is easy to see.
It's weird, I think Canelo does everything right and is crazy talented but I had him losing Trout, Lara and Cotto. There's a reason Spence is only stepping up at 26 ,while Canelo at 25 is a veteran has taking all the hard fights.Comment
-
To Alvarez's defense, pun intended, the kid has truly bumped up his A game in defense and reflexive skills. Cotto still hits hard and is an excellent boxer.
Cotto vs Pac 2 would easily do 2mill PPV's. Why wouldn't Pac want that rematch at 154 if supposedly he nullified it against Margarito just a tad south of the catch? My point is Cotto is still an elite and now bandwagoned of hate underrated fighter because people have focused on 160 yet don'T follow years before...Comment
-
Comment
Comment