Kellerman responds to criticism about calling Pac best of era
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Not only do I disagree but I didn't think he was that ignorant, SMW? In the ring the two practically weigh the same, Pacquiao put on more weight than Mayweather when Mayweather campaigned in the lower weight classes, particularly 130.Comment
-
Mayweather and Pacquaio are around the same size anyway.
From age 15-present they've always fought at the same weight class.
Obviously Pacquaio turned pro at age 15 so as a professional he's fought in more weight classes but when Pacquaio was 15 and Floyd was 15 they were both flyweights.Comment
-
I was surprised when I heard him use that analogy.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Hatton was lineal at 140 then...and Floyd did beat him..lolPac was lineal at 112 (Chatchai Sasakul), 126 (Barrera I), 130 (Marquez II), 140 (Hatton), and by some bodies 147 (Bradley III). Meaning he was not ever lineal at 122, 135, or 154.
Mayweather was lineal at 130 (Geno), 135 (Castillo), 147 (Baldomir and later Mosley or Guerrero, depending on who you ask) and 154 (Canelo). Meaning he was only not lineal at 140. He would probably have beaten whoever was lineal at 140 at the time anyhow.Comment
-
But dont you do the same thing when it comes to GGG not moving up? GGG fought at 147 at 19 by the way?Pacquiao is smaller than Mayweather, but not by much. Mayweather won the Golden Gloves at light flyweight at 16 and flyweight at 17. Pacquiao won the lineal flyweight title at 19. He's basically counting Mayweather's extensive amateur career against him.
Plus his argument doesn't make sense. Mayweather didn't beat Pacquiao based on size or power, he beat him with skill, which is the essence of pound for pound. Pacquiao pulverized Cotto at 145 lbs. and Margarito at 150 lbs. He put beatings on guys that are bigger and stronger than Floyd.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
Comment