Gennady "ggg" golovkin's pro resume exposed by troy king (boxingego)

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jmrf4435
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jun 2014
    • 8397
    • 772
    • 14
    • 66,112

    #121
    This didn't expose ****!! jealous phony ass Americans, top fighters avoid GGG like the black plague, how is that not obvious?

    Comment

    • bigjavi973
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2013
      • 24007
      • 759
      • 1,480
      • 1,236,071

      #122
      Originally posted by kafkod
      "Everybody from 154 to 168 doe ..."
      Isn't that what was stated from GGG's team?

      Comment

      • Citizen Koba
        Deplorable Peacenik
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jun 2013
        • 20457
        • 3,951
        • 3,801
        • 2,875,273

        #123
        Originally posted by JStill Unbiased
        yall did this same shit about floyd, annoying aint it lol
        Revenge is sweet, eh? I'd figured all the GGG shit was essentially a continuation of the Pac / Floyd silliness. Admit it, you kids just love arguing with each other.

        Comment

        • therealpugilist
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • May 2012
          • 14612
          • 561
          • 4
          • 45,735

          #124
          Originally posted by OnePunch
          no, you're a "hater" because instead of just ignoring a fighter you are dissatisfied with, you have this bizarre obsession that compels you to start thread after thread, day after day, saying the same exact thing you've already said 50 times before, as if its somehow going to change anything.

          All jokes aside, its really not healthy, and you might want to consider talking to someone about it.
          Im dissatisfied with ****riders like you who criticize who other boxers fight but eat it up when a fighter you like dont fight good opposition.


          Its okay to admit you are a little biased with certain fighters...but you cant dispute his resume is lacking for all the hype so you label me a hater/....I'll be a hater as long Im being real...which I am. Rememner who guys Like Pacquaio, Mayweather, Jones, Hopkins, Kovalev, Chocolatito, Bradley had to face to even be considered great or very good? this guy knocks out average guys and people like you act like he is the second coming of Marvin Hagler

          are you a true boxing fan or a casual who is a fan boy for one or two fighters?


          Do you know how many threads and comments tell you how great GGG is on this site...how he is a boogeyman...HBO pumps him up.....espn pumps him...then you look at who he actually fought and its like....MEH, whats the big deal.


          Name one fighter who did so little to be considered so-called on of the best in the game. His resume is on par with Keith Thurman. Is keith Thurman booleyhooed like he is the next Leonard....no!!!

          Comment

          • ИATAS
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jul 2007
            • 36648
            • 2,509
            • 1,953
            • 50,835

            #125
            Originally posted by therealpugilist
            Im dissatisfied with ****riders like you who criticize who other boxers fight but eat it up when a fighter you like dont fight good opposition.


            Its okay to admit you are a little biased with certain fighters...but you cant dispute his resume is lacking for all the hype so you label me a hater/....I'll be a hater as long Im being real...which I am. Rememner who guys Like Pacquaio, Mayweather, Jones, Hopkins, Kovalev, Chocolatito, Bradley had to face to even be considered great or very good? this guy knocks out average guys and people like you act like he is the second coming of Marvin Hagler

            are you a true boxing fan or a casual who is a fan boy for one or two fighters?


            Do you know how many threads and comments tell you how great GGG is on this site...how he is a boogeyman...HBO pumps him up.....espn pumps him...then you look at who he actually fought and its like....MEH, whats the big deal.


            Name one fighter who did so little to be considered so-called on of the best in the game. His resume is on par with Keith Thurman. Is keith Thurman booleyhooed like he is the next Leonard....no!!!


            Comment

            • therealpugilist
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • May 2012
              • 14612
              • 561
              • 4
              • 45,735

              #126
              Originally posted by JStill Unbiased
              yall did this same shit about floyd, annoying aint it lol
              Difference is they lambasted Floyd yet floyd was proven. Proof is in the pudding... yet praise GGG....now go look at Mayweathers resume with 34 fights and look at GGG's. its embarassing.


              Mayweather defeated 9 titleholders, titles in 3 divisions, 2 lineal titles with a total of 11 defenses and dude got trashed til he retired. GGG is beating who he is supposed to and people are acting like its groundbreaking stuff.


              thats the annoying part...Its not even about Floyd....look at the things Barrera, Hamed, Hopkins, Jones etc had to do to get p4p rankings, HBO backing, accolades, etc.

              Comment

              • therealpugilist
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • May 2012
                • 14612
                • 561
                • 4
                • 45,735

                #127
                Originally posted by ИATAS
                this may suck for you but my phone doesnt recognize that GIF you sent. Try forming a true rebuttal instead of replying like a teenager.

                Comment

                • jqSide
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Dec 2009
                  • 5229
                  • 551
                  • 166
                  • 11,252

                  #128
                  I would go along with this idiot poster if the guy he's hating is not being ducked like a plague. It's been normal to bash ducks, instead of the one being ducked, which is not case here.

                  Comment

                  • OnePunch
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2008
                    • 9121
                    • 1,307
                    • 776
                    • 2,453,131

                    #129
                    Originally posted by therealpugilist
                    Im dissatisfied with ****riders like you who criticize who other boxers fight but eat it up when a fighter you like dont fight good opposition.


                    Its okay to admit you are a little biased with certain fighters...but you cant dispute his resume is lacking for all the hype so you label me a hater/....I'll be a hater as long Im being real...which I am. Rememner who guys Like Pacquaio, Mayweather, Jones, Hopkins, Kovalev, Chocolatito, Bradley had to face to even be considered great or very good? this guy knocks out average guys and people like you act like he is the second coming of Marvin Hagler

                    are you a true boxing fan or a casual who is a fan boy for one or two fighters?


                    Do you know how many threads and comments tell you how great GGG is on this site...how he is a boogeyman...HBO pumps him up.....espn pumps him...then you look at who he actually fought and its like....MEH, whats the big deal.


                    Name one fighter who did so little to be considered so-called on of the best in the game. His resume is on par with Keith Thurman. Is keith Thurman booleyhooed like he is the next Leonard....no!!!

                    listen genius, nobody disputes that GGGs resume is lacking. The only "dispute" is assessing why. And BOLD TYPE and big fonts dont make your reasoning any less ******ed.

                    Having been in the business for almost 2 decades, I know enough to know not to criticize a fighter for things outside his control. You can babble on and on about Lara, or Ward, and blah blah blah, but they werent makeable fights then, or now. The man can only face the opponents that #1 are willing, and #2 that his team is able to make deals with. You seem to think that all it takes is a fighter saying 3 times in a mirror "I want the (insert boogeyman fighter name here) fight", and POOF like magic it happens......

                    Comment

                    • kafkod
                      I am Fanboy. Very Fanboy
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Sep 2013
                      • 24847
                      • 2,200
                      • 1,820
                      • 405,373

                      #130
                      Originally posted by kafkod
                      And this **** too:



                      "Everybody from 154 to 168 doe ..."
                      Originally posted by bigjavi973
                      Isn't that what was stated from GGG's team?
                      Yes it is. And .... Golovkin hasn't fought everybody from 154 to 168, so his team must be liars yeah?

                      That is an example of what I was talking about earlier ... inability to process more than one simple item of information at a time.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP