Let's be honest...Mayweather was boring

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • joseph5620
    undisputed
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 15628
    • 3,082
    • 5,652
    • 71,615

    #141
    Originally posted by A-Wolf
    ^^^^^^^^^^

    Look at this MORON.

    No response, eh?? Thought so. Weasel.
    I knew you were dumb but I had no idea to the extent that I had to repost your statements to refresh your memony:

    Originally posted by A-Wolf
    I agree to some extent, but not at all to the degree that he should now be likened to Mayweather. It was never like that and anyone who says so has no idea what they're talking about. Again, there are degrees to things.


    Anything else you want to lie about? Oh yeah, I couldn't care less what other accounts you've posted under here. That just means your alt is just as dumb as your original account.

    Comment

    • A-Wolf
      This One Can See
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Nov 2011
      • 6759
      • 265
      • 337
      • 61,371

      #142
      Originally posted by Sweet Jones
      And that is the problem with your entire argument. Accused of this by WHO?

      I don't know hardly any 'purist' who would call Mayweather a 'runner', or even 'boring'. Because most who DO 'understand the artform' never posit that and, just like with Pea, understand exactly what they are watching. There is an appreciation for their ability to continually dominate world class fighters by rendering them offensively impotent.

      The only folks I see claiming otherwise are either 'self proclaimed purists' who dislike Mayweather for non-boxing or stylistic reasons or 'casual fans' looking for bloodsport.

      You can't have it both ways. You can't dismiss the (false) accusations of Whitaker being 'boring' or a 'runner' as a 'non purist' viewpoint and then turn around and make the exact same (and equally false) accusation against Mayweather.

      That's like a Packer fan saying Cam Newton dabbing after a TD is 'disrespectful' while applauding your team's QB discount-double-checking all around Lambeau Field.

      Nah, bruh.
      You're trying to, in very direct, literal terms, lump Mayweather and Whitaker into the same category and you can't. That is your entire argument and it's weak. I think at this point we'll have to agree to disagree.
      Last edited by A-Wolf; 02-27-2016, 03:27 PM. Reason: SPELLING ERRORS

      Comment

      • A-Wolf
        This One Can See
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Nov 2011
        • 6759
        • 265
        • 337
        • 61,371

        #143
        Originally posted by joseph5620
        I knew you were dumb but I had no idea to the extent that I had to repost your statements to refresh your memony:





        Anything else you want to lie about? Oh yeah, I couldn't care less what other accounts you've posted under here. That just means your alt is just as dumb as your original account.
        Now I'm going to seriously ask you; are you mentally ******ed?

        Originally posted by joseph5620
        No, what's "straight dumb" is you denying that Whitaker received the same criticism from many people that he was "boring."
        You think that quote you posted fulfills your moronic claim that I "denied" Whitaker has been criticized for running??

        I "denied" he's been given that criticism? Not only are you a complete idiot, you have no honor. You're a vagina.

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP