Originally posted by Jc8804
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why do Floyd fans says the IV infusion was not illegal?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View PostSo WADA allows IV use for severe dehydration?
Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View PostFind me literature on the ''emergency'' level.Originally posted by GTTofAK View PostDamn you are a dumb ****.
"Quote:
Even though the majority of cases of dehydration can be treated via oral consumption, IV treatment of severe dehydration (>7% body weight loss), exertional heat illness, nausea, emesis, or diarrhea, and in those who cannot ingest oral fluids for other reasons, is clinically indicated.2,3,7,23,68 Otherwise, as the American College of Sports Medicine consensus guidelines state, "IV fluids do not provide an advantage over drinking oral fluids and electrolytes."
Face it you can't win. You are too ****ing ******.Last edited by GTTofAK; 02-17-2016, 05:38 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Russ. View PostWada wasnt in charge of the fight USADA was lol.
And yes it is illegal you ****** ****. WADA explicitly forbids TUE's for mild to moderate IV re-hydration. You only think you are doing well in this argument because SKH is agreeing with you. But look at his rep. Everyone knows he is a ****ing moron except you.Last edited by GTTofAK; 02-17-2016, 05:09 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GTTofAK View PostDamn you really are that ******. USADA is the US enforcement arm of WADA.
And yes it is illegal you ****** ****. WADA explicitly forbids TUE's for mild to moderate IV re-hydration. You only think you are doing well in this argument because SKH is agreeing with you. But look at his rep. Everyone knows he is a ****ing moron except you.
You wanna keep getting roasted? because the roasting is too much, just stop man, you cant prove anything. USADA even told dumbasses like you nothing wrong was done but you still dont get it. Youve had enough, im not wasting anymore of my time.
Comment
-
-
It's very sad that in the internet age, facts and logic are valued so little. It is indisputable fact that IV rehydration is 100% legal under NSAC rules. It's not a secret. It's been that way forever. NSAC admits it. USADA admits it. The fighters admit it.
But all it takes is a few basement dwellers winding up on the same website and they can convince each other of all sorts of wacky conspiracy theories that have no basis in fact or reality.
And since their reading comprehension is at a third grade level, they offer their "legal interpretation" of bylaws they do not understand and end up being so far off base it's not even funny.
Worse, they have absolutely no experience in the sport, so they convince themselves that retroactive exemptions are something unusual or controversial, even though it's basic common sense that in an urgent medical situation, the athlete doesn't have time to find out if the treatment he wants is allowed and the only logical thing to do is to plead their case later on for why it should be allowed so a judgement isn't made under duress.
IV use, in any amount, for any reason, is 100% legal under NSAC rules. If you don't think it should be, write them a letter, but please stop lying about whether it's legal.
Comment
-
Originally posted by original zero View PostIt's very sad that in the internet age, facts and logic are valued so little. It is indisputable fact that IV rehydration is 100% legal under NSAC rules. It's not a secret. It's been that way forever. NSAC admits it. USADA admits it. The fighters admit it.
But all it takes is a few basement dwellers winding up on the same website and they can convince each other of all sorts of wacky conspiracy theories that have no basis in fact or reality.
And since their reading comprehension is at a third grade level, they offer their "legal interpretation" of bylaws they do not understand and end up being so far off base it's not even funny.
Worse, they have absolutely no experience in the sport, so they convince themselves that retroactive exemptions are something unusual or controversial, even though it's basic common sense that in an urgent medical situation, the athlete doesn't have time to find out if the treatment he wants is allowed and the only logical thing to do is to plead their case later on for why it should be allowed so a judgement isn't made under duress.
IV use, in any amount, for any reason, is 100% legal under NSAC rules. If you don't think it should be, write them a letter, but please stop lying about whether it's legal.
Comment
-
Originally posted by original zero View PostIt's very sad that in the internet age, facts and logic are valued so little. It is indisputable fact that IV rehydration is 100% legal under NSAC rules.
Shut the **** up!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Russ. View PostI know this guy just doesnt seem to get that USADA allowed everything. No rules were broken.
Comment
Comment