Why do Floyd fans says the IV infusion was not illegal?

[Rath]

Yea it doesnt matter how he takes the saline and vitamins, all that matters is that its not a banned substance(which it isnt), he was granted a TUE and notified usada prior and after the use of it. So tell me , what is the big issue with floyd using this IV?

IV infusion of saline solution (not water, not salt separately but a solution of water and salt) beside rehydration purposes is also known as a masking agent.

floyd was not dehydrated where else do you think floyd use IV for.

oh wait because he's just tripping. LOL

why are you staying away from the Fact that the reason Floyd took IV was because he was dehydrated?

he said so himself.

[Rath]

No i think you are ignorant and trying to prove something that isnt true. Nothing done was illegal , floyd was granted the TUE. Everything was clarified and nothing against the rules was done. But dont take it from me, ill give you USADAS official statement regarding everything.

again:

Floyd said he took IV for rehydration purposes not because it was legal in Nevada.

Floyd was not dehydrated.

when was the TUE applied for

when was the TUE granted

TUE means The****utic use exemption, why would you apply for an exemption if it is legal?


" Whether due to a genuine misunderstanding of the facts or an intentional desire to mislead, numerous unfounded and false accusations have been leveled against USADA in recent on-line articles. Since our inception, USADA's sole mission has been to protect clean sport. As such, it is unfortunate and extremely disappointing to have to address articles riddled with significant inaccuracies and misrepresentations based on unsubstantiated rumors as well as anonymous or self-interested sources that have recklessly called our integrity into question. It is simply absurd to suggest that we would ever compromise our integrity for any sport or athlete.

Although the articles in question contain a multitude of errors, all of which will be addressed at the appropriate time,

When are they going to address this? appropriate time has not come yet?



we believe it is important to immediately correct the record regarding the false suggestion that Floyd Mayweather violated the rules by receiving an IV infusion of saline and vitamins.

How did you know the IV bag contains saline and Vit C?

did you test it's content?


As was already publicly reported in May of this year by the Nevada State Athletic Commission (NSAC), Mr. Mayweather applied for and was granted a The****utic Use Exemption (TUE) by USADA for an IV infusion of saline and vitamins that was administered prior to his May 2 fight

When did he applied for it?

When did you grant the TUE

again how did you know it was Saline and Vit C, did you test the contents of those IV bags?

against Manny Pacquiao. Mr. Mayweather's use of the IV was not prohibited under the NSAC rules at that time and would not be a violation of the NSAC rules today. Nonetheless, because Mr. Mayweather was voluntarily taking part in a USADA program,

It was not voluntarily, he demanded USADA testing exclusively where there are other drug testing agency that can do the same job at a cheaper price and has caught more cheater than USADA

spin it USADA


and therefore subject to the rules of the WADA Code, he took the additional step of applying for a TUE

USADA making it sound like Floyd did TUE on his own free will.

it is the rule and he has to abide by it whether he like it or not.

oh the spin

after the IV infusion was administered in order remain in compliance with the USADA program. Although Mr. Mayweather's application was not approved until after his fight with Mr. Pacquiao

of course, how can you approved something that Floyd has not yet applied for.


and all tests results were reported, Mr. Mayweather did disclose the infusion to USADA in advance of the IV being administered to him

This does not prove that USADA was there when Floyd administered IV.

it just says Floyd "disclosed" in advance floyd's IV use, wonder why they did not use the word 'notifiy"?


. Furthermore, once the TUE was granted

21 days later when the fight was done and over with and Team Pac can not do anything anymore to protest, challenged, complain about it.

, the NSAC and Mr. Pacquiao were immediately notified even though the practice is not prohibited under NSAC rules."

Yeah not prohibited under NSAC rule, but is prohibited under WADA and Pac vs Floyd fight is not just under NSAC but an addition drug testing was put in place.

is it not USADA? you even said voluntarily right?

lol.

what are you lollong about

USADA spinning it like a true genius floyd fan.

keep the spanking going floyd fans

[Rath]

Keep going this is funny. Who am i supposed to believe? You or USADA?

Incase you still dont get it, read this again, maybe youll get it after reading a couple more times

"As was already publicly reported in May of this year by the Nevada State Athletic Commission (NSAC), Mr. Mayweather applied for and was granted a The****utic Use Exemption (TUE) by USADA for an IV infusion of saline and vitamins that was administered prior to his May 2 fight against Manny Pacquiao. Mr. Mayweather's use of the IV was not prohibited under the NSAC rules at that time and would not be a violation of the NSAC rules today. Nonetheless, because Mr. Mayweather was voluntarily taking part in a USADA program, and therefore subject to the rules of the WADA Code, he took the additional step of applying for a TUE after the IV infusion was administered in order remain in compliance with the USADA program. Although Mr. Mayweather's application was not approved until after his fight with Mr. Pacquiao and all tests results were reported, Mr. Mayweather did disclose the infusion to USADA in advance of the IV being administered to him. Furthermore, once the TUE was granted, the NSAC and Mr. Pacquiao were immediately notified even though the practice is not prohibited under NSAC rules."

Ive roasted you enough with the facts, have a good day.

lame comeback

[Rath]

Yeah and sports media just went to sleep because they were aware of his journalistic credentials, or was it his chip over the shoulder?

wonder why sports media did not sleep when the mayweather accused Pac of PEDS.

probably they are not bias

[Rath]

How is it a non answer? Floyd told usada he needed vitamins and saline, they gave him permission , he used it

what is it "under the wada rules USADA are not allowed to give TUE" that you don't understand?


. Then after that he applied for the TUE and was granted it.

so Floyd watched the concert first then buys the ticket after 21 days later?

Why are you haters making this such a big deal? He took some vitamins and saline?

because Floyd lies, he said he did it because he was dehydrated which was proven he was not.

because he lied, he said a registered nurse administered the IV, wait sorry a a paramedic administered the IV, wait sorry, you don't have to know who administered the IV.

because he lied, he said giving blood and urine made him dehydrated, while 6 years back he did not believe Pac when he said 'giving blood so close to the fight make him weak"


how is that even supposed to effect his in ring performace lol?

if it does not have any effect at all why did go to al those trouble?

he has two of the best conditioning coach in the boxing business, did they not advice floyd that taking 750 ml of saline? and Vitamin C? don't give you any benefit at all?

Floyd you are not even dehydrated why IV?

He passed all of the drug tests no illegal subtances were found

Lance passed all the drug test too, what's your point?

you are acting like a damn fool . Set your bitter hatred for mayweather aside and look at the facts

have you look at the facts? i mean the facts not your make up spin kind of facts?

lol.

what are you lolling about?

keep the spanking going genius floyd fans

[Rath]

Wada wasnt in charge of the fight USADA was

original zero says otherwise. NSAC was in charged no USADA.


lol. Stop man, you just keep getting roasted. Btw getting a TUE from usada for an IV isnt illegal under wadas rules either.

USADA was working operating under WADA rules/codes

GTTAK already gave you that statement about WADA and IV and what say you?

nothing.

WADA basically is USADA

whoops you have it the other way USADA is basically WADA.

WADA can cut USADA services, USADA can not cut WADA.

WADA codes/rules in my opinion over rides USADA rules when it comes to drug testing.

LMAO

what are you LMAOing about?

keep the spanking going genius floyd fan

[Rath]

Although the articles in question contain a multitude of errors, all of which will be addressed at the appropriate time,

until now USADA has not done anything about this.

when is the appropriate time to address this?

[original zero]

Rath, how old are you, what is your IQ and what is your level of education?

[Rath]

Rath, how old are you, what is your IQ and what is your level of education?

you should know about my IQ i am beating you in our discussion LOL

your posts is just a better english than mine but you are losing

what's your thought about post #387?

[Marvellous1]

Floyd and Pac agreed that both parties will inform one another of any eventuality arising from drug testing related matters.

Did Floyd inform Pac's Team?

so let say Pac and Arum pursued it have it change to No contest.

what are you going to do with the billions of dollars of bet that already changed hands?



by the way do you really know what you are talking about

I know what I'm talking about. The problem is I don't know what you're talking about because you keep shifting the issue when one avenue doesn't work out for your crazy paranoid agenda, based on the inability to accept that Floyd Mayweather beat Manny Pacquiao and will be widely regarded as the best boxer of his generation.

Pacquiao and Top Rank must've been advised within the terms of the contract about the TUE or forget the No Contest, they could sue Mayweather for breach of contract.

Inventing hypothetical scenarios and then inventing wacky conspiracy theories to explain the lack of logical conclusions from said scenario is just pathetic.

You have no detailed knowledge of the contract, the events or the law supposedly broken (which IS the topic of this thread, right?). You're making it up as you go along and can't be taken seriously.