Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why do Floyd fans says the IV infusion was not illegal?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Jc8804 View Post
    Its only illegal if PAC would have done it.

    We would never hear the end of it from
    Medication nations groupies
    Actually no , if manny took vitamins and saline it wouldnt be illegal either.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View Post
      So WADA allows IV use for severe dehydration?
      You dumb ****** forgetfull ****. You tried this **** before.

      Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View Post
      Find me literature on the ''emergency'' level.
      Originally posted by GTTofAK View Post
      Damn you are a dumb ****.

      "Quote:
      Even though the majority of cases of dehydration can be treated via oral consumption, IV treatment of severe dehydration (>7% body weight loss), exertional heat illness, nausea, emesis, or diarrhea, and in those who cannot ingest oral fluids for other reasons, is clinically indicated.2,3,7,23,68 Otherwise, as the American College of Sports Medicine consensus guidelines state, "IV fluids do not provide an advantage over drinking oral fluids and electrolytes."
      It hasn't' changed you dumb****. WADA defines severe dehydration is a greater than 7% body weight loss. So are you saying that to make weight Froid cut form 146/.93 = 157?

      Face it you can't win. You are too ****ing ******.
      Last edited by GTTofAK; 02-17-2016, 05:38 PM.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Russ. View Post
        Wada wasnt in charge of the fight USADA was lol.
        Damn you really are that ******. USADA is the US enforcement arm of WADA.

        And yes it is illegal you ****** ****. WADA explicitly forbids TUE's for mild to moderate IV re-hydration. You only think you are doing well in this argument because SKH is agreeing with you. But look at his rep. Everyone knows he is a ****ing moron except you.
        Last edited by GTTofAK; 02-17-2016, 05:09 PM.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by GTTofAK View Post
          Damn you really are that ******. USADA is the US enforcement arm of WADA.

          And yes it is illegal you ****** ****. WADA explicitly forbids TUE's for mild to moderate IV re-hydration. You only think you are doing well in this argument because SKH is agreeing with you. But look at his rep. Everyone knows he is a ****ing moron except you.
          Yea its the same thing . USADA is working for wada, they are both pretty much the same company. If USADA decides to grant the TUE, it means its not against the rules of WADA either. WADA gives USADA permission to to whatever they want.

          You wanna keep getting roasted? because the roasting is too much, just stop man, you cant prove anything. USADA even told dumbasses like you nothing wrong was done but you still dont get it. Youve had enough, im not wasting anymore of my time.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Russ. View Post
            Yea its the same thing . USADA is working for wada, they are both pretty much the same company.
            No they are not. WADA has some 600 enforcement agencies under its umbrella you dolt. It doesn't have direct control.

            Comment


            • It's very sad that in the internet age, facts and logic are valued so little. It is indisputable fact that IV rehydration is 100% legal under NSAC rules. It's not a secret. It's been that way forever. NSAC admits it. USADA admits it. The fighters admit it.

              But all it takes is a few basement dwellers winding up on the same website and they can convince each other of all sorts of wacky conspiracy theories that have no basis in fact or reality.

              And since their reading comprehension is at a third grade level, they offer their "legal interpretation" of bylaws they do not understand and end up being so far off base it's not even funny.

              Worse, they have absolutely no experience in the sport, so they convince themselves that retroactive exemptions are something unusual or controversial, even though it's basic common sense that in an urgent medical situation, the athlete doesn't have time to find out if the treatment he wants is allowed and the only logical thing to do is to plead their case later on for why it should be allowed so a judgement isn't made under duress.

              IV use, in any amount, for any reason, is 100% legal under NSAC rules. If you don't think it should be, write them a letter, but please stop lying about whether it's legal.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by original zero View Post
                It's very sad that in the internet age, facts and logic are valued so little. It is indisputable fact that IV rehydration is 100% legal under NSAC rules. It's not a secret. It's been that way forever. NSAC admits it. USADA admits it. The fighters admit it.

                But all it takes is a few basement dwellers winding up on the same website and they can convince each other of all sorts of wacky conspiracy theories that have no basis in fact or reality.

                And since their reading comprehension is at a third grade level, they offer their "legal interpretation" of bylaws they do not understand and end up being so far off base it's not even funny.

                Worse, they have absolutely no experience in the sport, so they convince themselves that retroactive exemptions are something unusual or controversial, even though it's basic common sense that in an urgent medical situation, the athlete doesn't have time to find out if the treatment he wants is allowed and the only logical thing to do is to plead their case later on for why it should be allowed so a judgement isn't made under duress.

                IV use, in any amount, for any reason, is 100% legal under NSAC rules. If you don't think it should be, write them a letter, but please stop lying about whether it's legal.
                I know this guy just doesnt seem to get that USADA allowed everything. No rules were broken.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by original zero View Post
                  It's very sad that in the internet age, facts and logic are valued so little. It is indisputable fact that IV rehydration is 100% legal under NSAC rules.
                  Yet you cant post the ****ing rule! Are you saying that the NSAC simply forgot to add it to the exempt list?

                  Shut the **** up!

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Russ. View Post
                    I know this guy just doesnt seem to get that USADA allowed everything. No rules were broken.
                    Oh I get it. That was the point of Hauser's original article you dumb****. USADA is on the take to make sure fighters dont test positive. It wasn't about Froid. He was just one example.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by GTTofAK View Post
                      Yet you cant post the ****ing rule! Are you saying that the NSAC simply forgot to add it to the exempt list?

                      Shut the **** up!
                      You're a complete spazz...calm down

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP