who among suspected PED user got away the most: Pacquaio, Mayweather or Marquez?

[ADP02]

Review the video again, buddy. He makes it clear that he is talking about what is important when deeming if they can make a strong repair. He said these factors are considered when determining whether anything would prevent him from having a full recovery.

What he DID NOT say is that these things would allow him to fully recover in 3 months. Keep trying.

And while you keep trying, please explain this:

[IMG]http://i62.***********.com/albums/h95/travestyny/Screen%20Shot%202016-04-19%20at%209.35.44%20PM.png[/IMG]
A tad bit more than one month after surgery.

I'll be waiting for your speculation to clear this up. lol

Give up. It's over.

Like I have been saying from the start. Just think its Floyd IV Mayweather and the information will all come to you.

Where did you get that he was fully recovered at 3 months? I showed you what was said in late September and October. He was 80-90%!!!

Secondly, lots of websites I went to said that you can do passive exercises just weeks after and active exercises after that ....


What would you have said if this was Floyd? I can start with this:

"The flag was not heavy. The rod looks plastic."


Sorry but you have been very inconsistent with this so I'm having lots of difficulty with the new travestyny. The old one would not be speculating like this. The old travestyny would say that he would take what the doctor said in October over what a guy on the internet is speculating.

So as you can see, we have a conflict here between "OLD" travestyny vs "NEW" travestyny. Will the real travestyny please stand up!



.

[ADP02]

According to NSAC this is STEP 1:
All TUE applications must be sent to the NSAC since they are the sole authority on approving TUEs. Furthermore, the NSAC clarified all this and said that they do ban methods as well.

What the NSAC did next once it receives ALL TUE applications was supposed to be up to the NSAC not USADA.


NSAC: The NSAC is the "Sole authority" on TUE approvals ..... USADA is a testing organization not a TUE approving organization in the state of Nevada/

This really tells us all we need to know about this guy. How can he consistently claim that a TUE application should be sent to and approved by the NSAC when NSAC does not prohibit IV use. Does the NSAC suddenly become a signatory to the WADA code when USADA is involved, but only if USADA is involved?

Situation A: USADA is not a part of drug testing for a bout sanctioned by the NSAC.
Result: No TUE needed by the NSAC for IV use of any amount of non-prohibited substance.

Situation B: USADA is a part of drug testing for a bout sanctioned by the NSAC.
Result: NSAC suddenly follows WADA code and a TUE application must be sent to the NSAC for an IV infusion of over 50ml of non-prohibited substances in accordance with the WADA code.


Sorry, ADP02. This is beyond ******ed. You are making yourself look really bad, and the fact that you continue to hold onto this makes it clear there is no hope for you.

Sorry but this is NSAC who has said this. So you are saying that they are ******ed? Got it!

USADA has no authority to approve TUEs in Nevada.

NSAC: The NSAC is the "Sole authority" on TUE approvals ..... USADA is a testing organization not a TUE approving organization in the state of Nevada



.

[Dosumpthin]

According to NSAC this is STEP 1:
All TUE applications must be sent to the NSAC since they are the sole authority on approving TUEs. Furthermore, the NSAC clarified all this and said that they do ban methods as well.

What the NSAC did next once it receives ALL TUE applications was supposed to be up to the NSAC not USADA.


NSAC: The NSAC is the "Sole authority" on TUE approvals ..... USADA is a testing organization not a TUE approving organization in the state of Nevada/

Ok. I'll play along because this is really entertaining.

I'm dying to know your answer to this question.

Would have the NSAC denied FLOYD's request for a the****utic use exemption to rehydrate intravenously ?

If yes, please explain why AND post the NSAC rules that Floyd violated to support your claim.

[ADP02]

Ok. I'll play along because this is really entertaining.

I'm dying to know your answer to this question.

Would have the NSAC denied FLOYD's request for a the****utic use exemption to rehydrate intravenously ?

If yes, please explain why AND post the NSAC rules that Floyd violated to support your claim.

The NSAC may have denied just like they denied Manny and Manny's was for a non-prohibited substance!

So now its your turn .... GO!

[tangalog2200]

The NSAC may have denied just like they denied Manny and Manny's was for a non-prohibited substance!

So now its your turn .... GO!

still enjoying this, i see...ha ha ha

not to stray too far off, but as this issue could not be really separated from threads about who really won between pac & floyd, then what gives? can you please give me your 10 cents on this?

[Dosumpthin]

Originally Posted by Dosumpthin

Would have the NSAC denied FLOYD's request for a the****utic use exemption to rehydrate intravenously ?

If yes, please explain why AND post the NSAC rules that Floyd violated to support your claim.

The NSAC may have denied just like they denied Manny and Manny's was for a non-prohibited substance!

So now its your turn .... GO!

OFFICIAL COLOR GUIDE 2.0


RUMOR/MISINFORMATION = purple

SPECULATION/OPINION = blue

MISCONCEPTION/IRRELEVANT = orange

FACT= red

Try using your head and not your heart to answer the question with verifiable facts.

[ADP02]

still enjoying this, i see...ha ha ha

not to stray too far off, but as this issue could not be really separated from threads about who really won between pac & floyd, then what gives? can you please give me your 10 cents on this?

Yup, still at it .....

Sorry but I do not understand your question. Please explain.

[Larry the boss]

A damn good fight just went off.straight action...but of course ya'll are posting about this bull****..smh

[tangalog2200]

Yup, still at it .....

Sorry but I do not understand your question. Please explain.

how does this ped related thread relates to:

the pac floyd fight?

the nsac & usada?

vegas & the media?

[ADP02]

OFFICIAL COLOR GUIDE 2.0


RUMOR/MISINFORMATION = purple

SPECULATION/OPINION = blue

MISCONCEPTION/IRRELEVANT = orange

FACT= red

Try using your head and not your heart to answer the question with verifiable facts.

Historical fact: Manny was denied using a non-prohibited substance.

Historical fact: NSAC said that USADA knows that they cannot be approving TUEs in the state of Nevada.

NSAC clarified their position on IVs, retroactive TUEs and had told USADA that USADA cannot be approving TUEs in the state of Nevada but did.