Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

who among suspected PED user got away the most: Pacquaio, Mayweather or Marquez?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
    Once again, you have no idea what you are talking about. Show me what they have to say about acute or chronic dehydration for the TUE to be passed. I'll wait...
    It doesn't matter if they specifically say anything about chronic dehydration or not.

    Otherwise, as the American College of Sports Medicine consensus guidelines state, "IV fluids do not provide an advantage over drinking oral fluids and electrolytes."
    What does "otherwise" mean you moron? Its all about reading comprehension.

    As for "acute dehydration" well acute and severe are the same thing. Again reading comprehension.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by GTTofAK View Post
      Uh yes you ****ing can you dumb****. USADA is under WADA. WADA defines severe dehydration as



      Since Froids weight was checked regularly we know that his weight one month out from the fight was 150.5lbs. He weighed in at 146. That is a 3% loss of weight over a month. That is well below WADA definition of severe dehydration.

      So yes you dumbass it is proven beyond any reasonable doubt that Froid was not severely dehydrated as defined by WADA.
      why are you misleading people. WADA does not define severe dehdration as > than 7% body weight loss in the post you keep quoting.

      http://www.medicinenet.com/script/ma...rticlekey=2933

      One clue to dehydration is a rapid drop in weight
      . A loss of over 10% (15 pounds in a person weighing 150 pounds) is considered severe.

      Symptoms and signs of dehydration include increasing thirst, dry mouth, weakness or lightheadedness (particularly if worse on standing), and a darkening of the urine or a decrease in urination. Severe dehydration can lead to changes in the body's chemistry and kidney failure which may be life-threatening.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
        She clearly knows much more about this topic than you.
        That doesn't matter. She made false statements about Armstrong's positive EPO test. She has an established history of lying to cover for WADA labs failing to catch a cheater. She has no credibility because she is not an honest human being. No amount of education can make up for someone being a bad person.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by GTTofAK View Post
          I dont give a **** what her credentials are. Credentials do not means she is an honest human being. She has a history of making bull**** statements to the press to cover for failed tests. She isn't a credible source because she has previously made false statements.
          I knew you were ****** when you said nsac has zero credibilty. Statements like this make it pointless to have a debate with you.

          All statements are all lies
          Speculation is proof
          Rumors are Facts
          Ado's aren't credible sources but Victor conte is.


          Idiot.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
            Oh do I? I admit that you are an idiot. Please tell me, what do you say when people mention to you that if your little corner conspiracy is correct, that means all the judges gave Mayweather round 4 and 6. I've seen a few posters mention that to you, but never heard a clear answer from you.

            What say you?
            you said the only similarities between lance and floyd was that thy both used iv

            i proved it wrong.

            you said floyd never delays the testing collector because he provided them with partial urine sample.

            i proved that to be wrong too.

            but you won't admit and be a gentleman like GTTofAK about your istake because you know what.

            i will use it against you the way you use GTTofAK admission . and that would be really embarrassing right hahahahahaha.

            a dose of your own medicine right there.

            idiot you say.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
              why are you misleading people. WADA does not define severe dehdration as > than 7% body weight loss in the post you keep quoting.

              http://www.medicinenet.com/script/ma...rticlekey=2933

              He doesn't believe in conjunctions in the English language if it doesn't fit his agenda.


              He's not lying, just ******

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Rath View Post
                nope that how your flawed logic and twisted reasoning processed what i said.

                most if not all genius floyd fans have flawed logic and twisted reasoning and you are one of the example with your reply

                i posted an example about the two kinds of fans you were referring to. you even gave example of mac and pacboy and then me and spoon

                the one kind of fan that accepts what happened and move on and the other type of fan that keeps on fighting.

                that was my post was all about not for floyd to admit his cheating ways.

                he don't have to

                it will be exposed eventually ten 15 yrs we don't know but it will guaranteed

                you think you've got me there, right dunn?

                told you i know your game.

                SHAME ON YOU
                that was my post was all about not for floyd to admit his cheating ways.

                he don't have to it will be exposed eventually ten 15 yrs we don't know but it will guaranteed
                because Lance cheating got exposed years later you are saying same will happen to floyd. That is not valid anywhere except in the minds of the pac fans/floyd haters like yourself.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by GTTofAK View Post
                  It doesn't matter if they specifically say anything about chronic dehydration or not.



                  What does "otherwise" mean you moron? Its all about reading comprehension.

                  As for "acute dehydration" well acute and severe are the same thing. Again reading comprehension.
                  HAHAHAHAHAHA. It doesn't matter? Oh really? Last I checked, it did. Sorry.

                  Furthermore, you do realize that IV's are used for rehydration, right? Do I have to walk you through that too?

                  To go even further, again, what does USADA say about acute dehydration for the TUE? I'm waiting....

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
                    why are you misleading people. WADA does not define severe dehdration as > than 7% body weight loss in the post you keep quoting.
                    My source is from WADA directly. You found some site on the internet that defines it as a little more. I dont really know how you can be so ****ing ****** as to think that helps you because a 10% definition raises the bar even higher for Froid. You obviously suck at math too. Now Froid would have to be 146/.90 = 162.2lbs to be severely dehydrated. Do you think Froid cut down from 162.2? God you are ****ing dumb. I guess Froid has no excuse for not fighting GGG since you now claim he is really a ****ing middleweight.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by GTTofAK View Post
                      That doesn't matter. She made false statements about Armstrong's positive EPO test. She has an established history of lying to cover for WADA labs failing to catch a cheater. She has no credibility because she is not an honest human being. No amount of education can make up for someone being a bad person.
                      Dude, are you really this upset that she said what others have said...that T/E ratio doesn't definitively prove PED usage.

                      Oh yea, it doesn't fit your agenda.

                      Carry on.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP