-
-
OFFICIAL COLOR GUIDE 2.0
RUMOR/MISINFORMATION = purple
SPECULATION/OPINION = blue
MISCONCEPTION/IRRELEVANT = orange
FACT= red
Bob Bennet statements are regarding USADA, or ANY ADO WORLDWIDE, ISSUING a tue for something that is banned/prohibited by NSAC rules.
However, the iv use was NOT banned/prohibited under NSAC rules.
This is simple.Comment
-
NSAC says that only they can approve TUEs in the state of Nevada. So TUE applications should be sent over to NSAC not USADA. NSAC says that they are the sole authority in approving TUEs in the state of Nevada.
"USADA is supposed to be a drug-testing agency and not a TUE administrating organization.
Furthermore, if it was not enough to let USADA know about this, as NSAC stated they did on several occasions, NSAC has made these clarifications in their rules. This is concerning TUE approvals, methods and yes even retroactive TUEs.
Definition of "sole"
1.
being the only one; only:
the sole living relative.
2.
being the only one of the kind; unique; unsurpassed; matchless:
the sole brilliance of the gem.
3.
belonging or pertaining to one individual or group to the exclusion of all others; exclusive:
the sole right to the estate.
4.
functioning automatically or with independent power:
the sole authority.
5.
Chiefly Law. unmarried; not married.
6.
without company or companions; lonely:
the sole splendor of her life.
7.
Archaic. alone.
.Last edited by ADP02; 04-19-2016, 02:58 PM.Comment
-
MISCONCEPTION:
a view or opinion that is incorrect because it is based on faulty thinking or understanding.
OFFICIAL COLOR GUIDE 2.0
RUMOR/MISINFORMATION = purple
SPECULATION/OPINION = blue
MISCONCEPTION/IRRELEVANT = orange
FACT= red
1. Explain the process and reasoning for an athlete to apply for, and NSAC to grant an exemption for, something that IS NOT banned.Comment
-
According to NSAC this is STEP 1:
All TUE applications must be sent to the NSAC since they are the sole authority on approving TUEs. Furthermore, the NSAC clarified all this and said that they do ban methods as well.
What the NSAC did next once it receives ALL TUE applications was supposed to be up to the NSAC not USADA.
NSAC: The NSAC is the "Sole authority" on TUE approvals ..... USADA is a testing organization not a TUE approving organization in the state of Nevada/Comment
-
Review the video again, buddy. He makes it clear that he is talking about what is important when deeming if they can make a strong repair. He said these factors are considered when determining whether anything would prevent him from having a full recovery.
What he DID NOT say is that these things would allow him to fully recover in 3 months. Keep trying.
And while you keep trying, please explain this:
[IMG]http://i62.***********.com/albums/h95/travestyny/Screen%20Shot%202016-04-19%20at%209.35.44%20PM.png[/IMG]
A tad bit more than one month after surgery.
I'll be waiting for your speculation to clear this up. lol
Give up. It's over.Comment
-
This really tells us all we need to know about this guy. How can he consistently claim that a TUE application should be sent to and approved by the NSAC when NSAC does not prohibit IV use. Does the NSAC suddenly become a signatory to the WADA code when USADA is involved, but only if USADA is involved?
Situation A: USADA is not a part of drug testing for a bout sanctioned by the NSAC.
Result: No TUE needed by the NSAC for IV use of any amount of non-prohibited substance.
Situation B: USADA is a part of drug testing for a bout sanctioned by the NSAC.
Result: NSAC suddenly follows WADA code and a TUE application must be sent to the NSAC for an IV infusion of over 50ml of non-prohibited substances in accordance with the WADA code.
Sorry, ADP02. This is beyond ******ed. You are making yourself look really bad, and the fact that you continue to hold onto this makes it clear there is no hope for you.Comment
Tweet
Comment