who among suspected PED user got away the most: Pacquaio, Mayweather or Marquez?

[GTTofAK]

So this is your proof. This is what you are using to validate your statement that the dco diagnosed Floyd's medical condition. Wow you are very ******.

And moron doesn't bold the 'precipitated the need for an IV' part.

[GTTofAK]

You can't even properly read the ISTUE, which is the only thing that matters here. When you learn how to decipher that, which a HS student can do, please come back. Until then, I suggest you go pick up "Hooked on Phonics."

Any official WADA declarations in IV re-hydration are at issue here. Shut the **** up.

[travestyny]

Oh look at that the moron bolded some stuff red. And made some vague ****ing statement because he reads at a 4th grade level. News flash you ****ing idiot. The references WADA uses specifically defines sever dehydration.



Now shut the **** up you ****ing alt. You think no one has noticed that you are one of travesty's alts?

hahahahaha. One of my alts? Oh really? The usual rhetoric when you are getting your head handed to you.

He's highlighting in red because you read at a 1st grade level.

So please go to the ISTUE and show where it states severe dehydration is required for the TUE to be approved. I'll be waiting.

[GTTofAK]

hahahahaha. One of my alts? Oh really?

Yeah moron one posts then within 5 minutes the other quotes.

Its obvious you are one guy running two accounts, probably more.

[Real King Kong]

[travestyny]

Yeah moron one posts then within 5 minutes the other quotes.

Its obvious you are one guy running two accounts, probably more.

I don't need an alt, ******. I've been owning you left and right here. Why would I need to do it under two accounts?

Again, please go to the ISTUE and show me where severe dehydration is required for the TUE. You gonna step up or back down like a b*tch?

[GTTofAK]

Not really a circular argument means you logically get back to the same point. When moron and his alts try and say that IV's are legal for TUE and in response you show WADA specifically banning and they respond by making the same argument again that is not a crucial argument.

[GTTofAK]

I don't need an alt, ******. I've been owning you left and right here.

You are an insecure loser who needs to have a fake account.

Just go back over the history of the thread. Its obvious. One posts the other quotes within a few minutes. Just as long as it takes to switch accounts and write some tripe.

[travestyny]

You are an insecure loser who needs to have a fake account.

ahhahahahaha. So you can't go to the ISTUE and show me where it states severe dehydration is required to receive the TUE?

Checkmate, b*tch. Run along now. I'm tired of owning you, clown boy.

[GTTofAK]

ahhahahahaha. So you can't go to the ISTUE and show me where it states severe dehydration is required to receive the TUE?

All official statements from WADA are material not just the general ISTUE form. WADA researched the medical literature and concluded that IV re-hydration for mild to moderate dehydration does not meet the no other options standard.

The use of IV infusions in sport is commonly linked with rehydration after exhaustive effort, and this situation is arguably the major cause of debate. It must be understood that the use of IV fluid replacement following exercise to correct mild to moderate dehydration is not clinically indicated nor substantiated by the medical literature. There is a well-established body of scientific evidence to confirm that oral rehydration is the preferred the****utic choice, potentially even more effective than IV infusion.