Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

who among suspected PED user got away the most: Pacquaio, Mayweather or Marquez?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by GTTofAK View Post
    All official statements from WADA are material not just the general ISTUE form. WADA researched the medical literature and concluded that IV re-hydration for mild to moderate dehydration does not meet the no other options standard of ISTUE.
    Say what? Please show me where it states that in the ISTUE. Last I saw, there is a section for a medical practitioner to justify the method being used. Don't you see that there, or was it too hard for you to comprehend?

    Again, show me the statement where it says IV hydration does not meet the no other options standard of the ISTUE. I'm waiting.

    If you can't show that proof, admit that you are a b*tch for trying to make things up and scamper off.

    Comment


    • All of the above.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
        Again, show me the statement where it says IV hydration does not meet the no other options standard of the ISTUE. I'm waiting.
        Uh its right there in the statement moron.

        The use of IV infusions in sport is commonly linked with rehydration after exhaustive effort, and this situation is arguably the major cause of debate. It must be understood that the use of IV fluid replacement following exercise to correct mild to moderate dehydration is not clinically indicated nor substantiated by the medical literature. There is a well-established body of scientific evidence to confirm that oral rehydration is the preferred the****utic choice, potentially even more effective than IV infusion.
        In other words you can drink something instead of taking the IV.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by GTTofAK View Post
          Thats not WADA code. That is a study the code referenced. The code says only severe dehydration.
          WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO BACK THIS UP? SHOW IT IN THE CODE! Sounds like you are attempting to state a fact. LET'S SEE IT!

          Comment


          • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
            WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO BACK THIS UP? SHOW IT IN THE CODE! Sounds like you are attempting to state a fact. LET'S SEE IT!
            Posted it dozens of times. You simply ignore it.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
              Say what? Please show me where it states that in the ISTUE. Last I saw, there is a section for a medical practitioner to justify the method being used. Don't you see that there, or was it too hard for you to comprehend?

              Again, show me the statement where it says IV hydration does not meet the no other options standard of the ISTUE. I'm waiting.

              If you can't show that proof, admit that you are a b*tch for trying to make things up and scamper off.
              Exactly!! But he can't! But he is an athelete, you know?
              Athelete's foot doesn't make him an athelete!

              He's gonna get real mad!! I feel so scared!
              Last edited by Zaroku; 03-22-2016, 06:22 PM.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by HandsofIron View Post
                All of the above.
                He is gonna get really mad now!

                Hahahahahaha

                Comment


                • Originally posted by GTTofAK View Post
                  Posted it dozens of times. You simply ignore it.
                  Just post it one last time to prove your point if you have one!

                  Simple!

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by GTTofAK View Post
                    Uh its right there in the statement moron.



                    In other words you can drink something instead of taking the IV.
                    WRONG!

                    The code states the athlete must show:

                    c. There is no reasonable The****utic alternative to the Use of the Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method.


                    Then we have this:

                    [IMG]http://i62.***********.com/albums/h95/travestyny/Screen%20Shot%202016-03-22%20at%2010.15.18%20PM.png[/IMG]

                    The athlete/medical practitioner must justify the use. It states this clearly.

                    "The use of IV infusions in sport is commonly linked with rehydration after exhaustive effort, and this situation is arguably the major cause of debate. It must be understood that the use of IV fluid replacement following exercise to correct mild to moderate dehydration is not clinically indicated nor substantiated by the medical literature. There is a well-established body of scientific evidence to confirm that oral rehydration is the preferred the****utic choice, potentially even more effective than IV infusion."

                    WHERE DOES THIS SAY THAT AN IV SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR REHYDRATION PURPOSES???? It says:
                    1. IV rehydration's use for correcting mild to moderate rehydration is not clinically indicated nor substantiated
                    2. There is a body of scientific evidence to confirm oral rehydration is PREFERRED
                    3. Oral hydration is POTENTIALLY even more effective than IV rehydration.

                    FROM THAT YOU SAY THAT IV REHYDRATION IS ALWAYS UNDER EVERY CIRCUMSTANCE DISALLOWED?

                    This is why I've said over and over you have poor reading comprehension skills. Again, refer to the ISTUE above.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by GTTofAK View Post
                      Posted it dozens of times. You simply ignore it.
                      Oh you did? Post it up please.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP