Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

who among suspected PED user got away the most: Pacquaio, Mayweather or Marquez?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
    Too bad IVs are banned! Floyd should of just had a V8!


    I just want to be sure that we all understand the truth of the matter. We just do not want the few who would take a bullet for their hero to be spreading ignorance ........
    IV's are banned? NO it was just a saline solution.

    everybody were using it, They did nothing wrong.

    why would you ban something that is not wrong?

    Comment


    • Originally posted by considerthis View Post
      There's no need to guess...it's laid out in their new testing policy. Now kindly go **** yourself f@ggot.
      wow they banned something that is just salt and water LOL

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Rath View Post
        IV's are banned? NO it was just a saline solution.

        everybody were using it, They did nothing wrong.

        why would you ban something that is not wrong?
        That is what a Floyd fan that would take a bullet would have us all believe. IVs are OK.

        Imagine, years ago Lance Armstrong used to smuggle a saline solution just to hide the fact that he was using an IV. Now Floyd fans think its OK since its just saline solution and vitamins.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
          That is what a Floyd fan that would take a bullet would have us all believe. IVs are OK.

          Imagine, years ago Lance Armstrong used to smuggle a saline solution just to hide the fact that he was using an IV. Now Floyd fans think its OK since its just saline solution and vitamins.
          Ivs are banned unless you have a tue

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Dosumpthin View Post
            Ivs are banned unless you have a tue

            safe to say floyd used banned substance/procedure and was illegal from May 1st to May 20th right?


            who's authorized to give TUE, the commission or the testing agency?

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Dosumpthin View Post
              Ivs are banned unless you have a tue
              This is for a retroactive TUE. Right?

              Floyd was not an emergency type case nor was Floyd severely dehydrated. That is when you would be giving a retroactive TUE. There was an alternative for Floyd's condition. It is called orally rehydrating yourself.



              Try to be objective: Do you really think that Floyd was severely dehydrated? Please do not deflect.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Rath View Post
                safe to say floyd used banned substance/procedure and was illegal from May 1st to May 20th right?


                who's authorized to give TUE, the commission or the testing agency?
                You have to research and post the definitions of the words;(adjective and adverb) and use them in an example sentence; before myself, and I recommend anyone else, respond to your future post. This is a non negotiable requirement.


                Thank you.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Dosumpthin View Post
                  You have to research and post the definitions of the words;(adjective and adverb) and use them in an example sentence; before myself, and I recommend anyone else, respond to your future post. This is a non negotiable requirement.


                  Thank you.
                  you have not answered difference between notification and application

                  difference between application and submission

                  and how long does it take to draft/make an application for TUE?

                  that was even before you set this rule that is non negotiable.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                    This is for a retroactive TUE. Right?

                    Floyd was not an emergency type case nor was Floyd severely dehydrated. That is when you would be giving a retroactive TUE. There was an alternative for Floyd's condition. It is called orally rehydrating yourself.
                    An application for a TUE will only be considered for retroactive approval where:

                    a. Emergency treatment or treatment of an acute medical condition was necessary; or

                    b. Due to other exceptional circumstances, there was insufficient time or opportunity for the Athlete to submit, or for the TUEC to consider, an application for the TUE prior to Sample collection; or

                    c. It is agreed, by WADA and by the Anti-Doping Organization to whom the application for a retroactive TUE is or would be made, that fairness requires the grant of a retroactive
                    TUE.


                    Do you know what conjunctions are and how they are used? Why do you ignore this? Explain.

                    Try to be objective: Do you really think that Floyd was severely dehydrated? Please do not deflect.
                    I don't know how dehydrated Floyd was. All we can do is speculate.

                    We do know iv use is banned under wada....unless you have a tue.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Rath View Post
                      you have not answered difference between notification and application

                      difference between application and submission

                      and how long does it take to draft/make an application for TUE?

                      that was even before you set this rule that is non negotiable.

                      What part of "non-negotiable requirement" do you not understand?

                      It is impossible to have a meaningful discussion if we can not communicate effectively.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP