Originally posted by travestyny
View Post
If it was so immaterial, why were you arguing about it and digging your grave, fool? And aren't you tired of being wrong yet?
Did you even read my last post? Come on man, reading comprehension. Use it. I don't have time to walk you through the ABC's right now.
But according to you, they were all cheating.
And what about the other tests that were testing for it? What did you have to say about that? Oh yea, that's right, it didn't fit your agenda. You said the UEFA can't be used because it doesn't test for TRT. Let's continue...
About Jones test, here is the head of an accredited WADA laboratory in Montreal. Enjoy![/B]
[B]Dr. Christiane Ayotte, the head of the WADA-accredited laboratory in Montreal, saw no problem with Jones' T/E ratio.
"One way to manipulate a T/E ratio downward would be to take epitestosterone, but Ayotte said that would be easily detected in a screening.
[B]Dr. Christiane Ayotte, the head of the WADA-accredited laboratory in Montreal, saw no problem with Jones' T/E ratio.
"One way to manipulate a T/E ratio downward would be to take epitestosterone, but Ayotte said that would be easily detected in a screening.
#1 Take epitestosterone to lower the T/E ratio.
#2 Take an IV to lower the concentration of both test and epitest.
So no it is not easily caught in screening because you can easily take an IV to lower the total epitest.
I am sorry, but such T/E values are not at all abnormal[/COLOR]," she said. " … The administration of epitestosterone is easily detected. It does not give a small increase that looks natural, but a huge peak that is very difficult to control. I have seen only one case of attempted masking with epitestosterone and it was readily detected.
"Epitestosterone is not metabolized rapidly and stays high. An epitestosterone urine sample does not look like the ones you sent me."
"Epitestosterone is not metabolized rapidly and stays high. An epitestosterone urine sample does not look like the ones you sent me."
Lets look at he ******ity of her statement. BALCO beat the testers for years using the cream and the clear, testosterone and epitestosterone. And they aren't the only ones. Yet this ***** says that she has only seen one attempted case. Come on you cant be that ****ing ******.
If anything this dumb ***** confirms how easy it is to beat the test. In only 1 case was someone so ****** as to get their epitest so high that it could be detected.
Thanks for proving my point. If you think their lab only had one person ever try and beat their test with epitestesterone you are an absolute dumbass.
I'll make this very simple, idiot. If, as you insinuate, that all you need to prove someone is cheating is for them to have abnormal T/E ratio, then why isn't that the only standard for a negative test?
If it was so ****ing easy to catch people masking testosterone with epitestosterone this lab should have caught more than 1 dont you think?
Your Logical conclusion: There must be (not maybe...must be) something wrong with the tests. There is no way someone with abnormal T/E ratio is clean because it doesn't fit my agenda.
The natural conditions that cause a low TE ratio such as hypogandism preclude a man from being an elite athlete.
To beat a testosterone test you need to do two things.
#1 Take epitestosterone to drop your TE ratio.
#2 Take an IV to lower the free test and free epitest.
We have evidence of Froid doing both.
Comment