who among suspected PED user got away the most: Pacquaio, Mayweather or Marquez?

[Rath]

you may be slightly ******ed.

don't you feel shame, a slightly ******ed poster owning genius floyd fans?

#ruinedlife

LOL

[Lester Tutor]

He got left with A PAC Pumpkin head...

Marquez be like, "este e'thread es muy chingon! Les dije en ESPN que Floyd le hiba a ganar. Se los dije! Pero ya pues....estoy ganando el poll, como mi knockout en el 6!"

[Zaroku]

Marquez be like, "este e'thread es muy chingon! Les dije en ESPN que Floyd le hiba a ganar. Se los dije! Pero ya pues....estoy ganando el poll, como mi knockout en el 6!"

Hahahaha

Ay Dios Mio...

Suerte hermano.

[Dosumpthin]

NSAC is not the drug testing agency on Floyd vs Pac, so NSAC rule on drug testing was null and void.

USADA was not an extra drug testing but, the sole drug testing agency that conduct the test and therefore their rules should be followed and not NSAC drug testing rules and protocols.

saying NSAC allowed iv infusion is justified if it was NSAC who did the drug testing but since they did not that statement does not matter.

If floyd or manny failed a drug test, who would usada report to and what agency would be responsible for punishing them?

[Rath]

If floyd or manny failed a drug test, who would usada report to and what agency would be responsible for punishing them?

i told you there's something really wrong with your logic.

we are at the " IV is allowed by NSAC" statement.

NSAC was not the drug testing agency in this fight so what they or they don't allowed does not matter.

why are genius floyd fan using that as a justification for IV infusion?

NSAC has nothing to do with it.

only USADA does.

[Dosumpthin]

i told you there's something really wrong with your logic.

we are at the " IV is allowed by NSAC" statement.

NSAC was not the drug testing agency in this fight so what they or they don't allowed does not matter.

why are genius floyd fan using that as a justification for IV infusion?

NSAC has nothing to do with it.

only USADA does.

But you didnt answer.

If floyd or manny failed a drug test, who would usada report to and what agency would be responsible for punishing them?

Thats the question.

[Rath]

But you didnt answer.

If floyd or manny failed a drug test, who would usada report to and what agency would be responsible for punishing them?


Thats the question.

The implementation of drug testing rules/protocols/regulations was for USSADA.

The implementation of penalties/punishments was for NSAC.

therefore NSAC has nothing to do with the drug testing rules/protocols/regulatinos. as USADA hasnothing to do with the implementation of penalties/punishments. using "NSAC rules allows IV infusion" is invalid.


two agencies both independent from each other.

Now how could NSAC going to implement those penalties/punishments if USADA are not going to inform them in timely manner?


got it genius floyd fan?

spin it.

now answer this:

There is a retroactive TUE principle, but is there a retroactive application for TUE?

[Dosumpthin]

The implementation of drug testing rules/protocols/regulations was for USSADA.

The implementation of penalties/punishments was for NSAC.

therefore NSAC has nothing to do with the drug testing rules/protocols/regulatinos. as USADA hasnothing to do with the implementation of penalties/punishments. using "NSAC rules allows IV infusion" is invalid.


two agencies both independent from each other.

Now how could NSAC going to implement those penalties/punishments if USADA are not going to inform them in timely manner?


got it genius floyd fan?

spin it.

now answer this:

There is a retroactive TUE principle, but is there a retroactive application for TUE?

If your interpetation of the Nevada State Athletic Commision involvement as you describe as "null and void" is accurate, what gave NSAC the authority to deny mannys drugs (toradol ****tail) and things like his own gatorade before the fight?

There is a retroactive TUE principle, but is there a retroactive application for TUE?

An application for a TUE will only be considered for retroactive approval where:

a. Emergency treatment or treatment of an acute medical condition was necessary; or

b. Due to other exceptional circumstances, there was insufficient time or opportunity for the Athlete to submit, or for the TUEC to consider, an application for the TUE prior to Sample collection; or

c. It is agreed, by WADA and by the Anti-Doping Organization to whom the application for a retroactive TUE is or would be made, that fairness requires the grant of a retroactive TUE.


AS PER USADA.

[Zaroku]

The implementation of drug testing rules/protocols/regulations was for USSADA.

The implementation of penalties/punishments was for NSAC.

therefore NSAC has nothing to do with the drug testing rules/protocols/regulatinos. as USADA hasnothing to do with the implementation of penalties/punishments. using "NSAC rules allows IV infusion" is invalid.


two agencies both independent from each other.

Now how could NSAC going to implement those penalties/punishments if USADA are not going to inform them in timely manner?


got it genius floyd fan?

spin it.

now answer this:

There is a retroactive TUE principle, but is there a retroactive application for TUE?

I never heard of a retroactive TUE before.

But..... Who has the ultimate authority over this fight???

NSAC or USADA???

Does NASC have the power to over rule things...

Or does contract law::: TMT & TR control???

If Arum isn't making a big deal about it... Just saying...

[Real King Kong]

don't you feel shame, a slightly ******ed poster owning genius floyd fans?

#ruinedlife

LOL

Hmm...so you agree then.