Tweet
oh and by the way this technique you were using is no longer original.
it was used by another genius floyd fans before it did not work then. it will not work now.
loser, i ruined your life, move on and let it go
-
nope you just confirmed to NSB board that you were owned by slighty ******ed poster.
oh and by the way this technique you were using is no longer original.
it was used by another genius floyd fans before it did not work then. it will not work now.
loser, i ruined your life, move on and let it go -
GTTofAK in this thread.
Comment
-
Dude, I already destroyed you and you have the nerve to come back to this thread? Haven't heard from you in days, so I thought you had the good sense to just tuck your tail and go play in traffic. Do I really have to waste my time with you, a certifiable idiot, again?
Once again, what I stated was that USADA was going after Lance and I proved it. What you've added even helps give details about what I said. Thank you for making yourself look even more like a moron. I take no pride in showing up someone with obvious symptoms of mental ******ation, but for good measure, here is what USADA had:
"The evidence of the US Postal Service Pro Cycling Team-run scheme is overwhelming and is in excess of 1000 pages, and includes sworn testimony from 26 people, including 15 riders with knowledge of the US Postal Service Team (USPS Team) and its participants’ doping activities. The evidence also includes direct documentary evidence including financial payments, emails, scientific data and laboratory test results that further prove the use, possession and distribution of performance enhancing drugs by Lance Armstrong and confirm the disappointing truth about the deceptive activities of the USPS Team, a team that received tens of millions of American taxpayer dollars in funding."
They went hard after Armstrong, you imbecile.
Your statements "he would just take another IV....there is no evidence he gave a partial sample....no evidence they weren't tipping him off..." is all complete speculation. Maybe f@cking aliens came down and gave him super powers. But answer this. If he just took another IV, why the hell would they go through the trouble of revealing the first IV if they were willing to ignore other IV's? Why wouldn't they ignore both? And don't give me that "some people at USADA were paid off and some weren't" bull**** because you already implied that he was tipped off on when to take the first IV. You also said that there is no evidence he gave a partial urine sample, so you are clearly implying the DCO who visited Floyd during the documented IV was crooked. Do you realize that you are a moron yet, or should I keep going?
Stop eating from Hauser's a$$. He has already been proven wrong multiple times, and has even had to retract some of his statements. I would think that by now you all should realize he couldn't even support his own arguments. His bs isn't going to help you.
Don't tell me you saw any response coming from me because it's obvious that you didn't. If you did, you wouldn't have said the dumb sh@t that got you dealt with the first time. So now you try to say the UEFA began testing in 2014? Really? I find it heard to believe you have any degree at all if they never taught you to do any research. So yea, your multiple science degrees from the University of Hauser don't quite cut it.You know I kind of saw this responce comming from you. I said to myslef 'Self this ****ing moron obviously hasn't read the study so he doesn't know what years the samples were from. He's so ****ing dumb he is going to claim that since they started testing in 2014 its a tested league. This ****ing dumbass is too damn ignorant to know that it takes years before a paper is published and the actual data comes from well before the testing program.'
This just shows that you are ****** moron who can do little more than search goggle. I have multiple science degrees you ****ing dolt. I read the damn study you cited. They used urine samples from 2008-2013 in 2014 they implemented the program you moron.
If you had looked you would have easily found that many viewed these results as proof that there was a major PED problem in the UEFA.
"The European football union UEFA announced three doping cases for its competitions in the 2006-07 season, four less than in the previous season. The three positive findings compromised two cases of cannabis and one for a high concentration of Betamethasone at a Euro 2008 qualifier. In the 2006-07, UEFA carried out 1662 tests in and out of competitions, including 938 players tested for the blood doping substance EPO."
This clearly shows that the UEFA was drug testing at least since 2005! The article is from 2007 and is titled "UEFA Continues Doping Fight"
Please stop doing this to yourself. You should talk with people who have a degree in special education. I don't wish to work with mentally ******ed children.
Oh, Floyd Landis with his HS education was able to beat it. Does that mean Manny Pacquaio was able to beat it too? Who else would be able to beat it. Tell me more.
First of all, when was Floyd Landis beating these tests? Do you realize what year we are in now? If you think that the testing has just stayed the same since he was relevant, you are mistaken. There have been various upgrades to their testing.
From 2013: "New EPO Test Could Help Stamp Out Microdosing."
However, it's not my intention nor my desire to defend agencies that test for doping. It's clear that the ABP has helped reduce doping. The data to suggest that is there. Yes, it is quite possible that some sophisticated cheaters can possibly beat the test. So what is your contention? Is it that everyone can possibly cheat? How does saying it is possible to beat it prove that Mayweather took PED's? Criticizing current drug testing protocols doesn't incriminate those who take the tests, clearly.
In conclusion, you've shown that you are an idiot once again. I suggest you take those science degrees and shove them up your arse. You aren't nearly as bright as you think you are.Comment
-
have you established already with certainty that floyd was dehydrated may 1st?Dude, I already destroyed you and you have the nerve to come back to this thread? Haven't heard from you in days, so I thought you had the good sense to just tuck your tail and go play in traffic. Do I really have to waste my time with you, a certifiable idiot, again?
Once again, what I stated was that USADA was going after Lance and I proved it. What you've added even helps give details about what I said. Thank you for making yourself look even more like a moron. I take no pride in showing up someone with obvious symptoms of mental ******ation, but for good measure, here is what USADA had:
"The evidence of the US Postal Service Pro Cycling Team-run scheme is overwhelming and is in excess of 1000 pages, and includes sworn testimony from 26 people, including 15 riders with knowledge of the US Postal Service Team (USPS Team) and its participants’ doping activities. The evidence also includes direct documentary evidence including financial payments, emails, scientific data and laboratory test results that further prove the use, possession and distribution of performance enhancing drugs by Lance Armstrong and confirm the disappointing truth about the deceptive activities of the USPS Team, a team that received tens of millions of American taxpayer dollars in funding."
They went hard after Armstrong, you imbecile.
Your statements "he would just take another IV....there is no evidence he gave a partial sample....no evidence they weren't tipping him off..." is all complete speculation. Maybe f@cking aliens came down and gave him super powers. But answer this. If he just took another IV, why the hell would they go through the trouble of revealing the first IV if they were willing to ignore other IV's? Why wouldn't they ignore both? And don't give me that "some people at USADA were paid off and some weren't" bull**** because you already implied that he was tipped off on when to take the first IV. You also said that there is no evidence he gave a partial urine sample, so you are clearly implying the DCO who visited Floyd during the documented IV was crooked. Do you realize that you are a moron yet, or should I keep going?
Stop eating from Hauser's a$$. He has already been proven wrong multiple times, and has even had to retract some of his statements. I would think that by now you all should realize he couldn't even support his own arguments. His bs isn't going to help you.
Don't tell me you saw any response coming from me because it's obvious that you didn't. If you did, you wouldn't have said the dumb sh@t that got you dealt with the first time. So now you try to say the UEFA began testing in 2014? Really? I find it heard to believe you have any degree at all if they never taught you to do any research. So yea, your multiple science degrees from the University of Hauser don't quite cut it.
"The European football union UEFA announced three doping cases for its competitions in the 2006-07 season, four less than in the previous season. The three positive findings compromised two cases of cannabis and one for a high concentration of Betamethasone at a Euro 2008 qualifier. In the 2006-07, UEFA carried out 1662 tests in and out of competitions, including 938 players tested for the blood doping substance EPO."
This clearly shows that the UEFA was drug testing at least since 2005! The article is from 2007 and is titled "UEFA Continues Doping Fight"
Please stop doing this to yourself. You should talk with people who have a degree in special education. I don't wish to work with mentally ******ed children.
Oh, Floyd Landis with his HS education was able to beat it. Does that mean Manny Pacquaio was able to beat it too? Who else would be able to beat it. Tell me more.
First of all, when was Floyd Landis beating these tests? Do you realize what year we are in now? If you think that the testing has just stayed the same since he was relevant, you are mistaken. There have been various upgrades to their testing.
From 2013: "New EPO Test Could Help Stamp Out Microdosing."
However, it's not my intention nor my desire to defend agencies that test for doping. It's clear that the ABP has helped reduce doping. The data to suggest that is there. Yes, it is quite possible that some sophisticated cheaters can possibly beat the test. So what is your contention? Is it that everyone can possibly cheat? How does saying it is possible to beat it prove that Mayweather took PED's? Criticizing current drug testing protocols doesn't incriminate those who take the tests, clearly.
In conclusion, you've shown that you are an idiot once again. I suggest you take those science degrees and shove them up your arse. You aren't nearly as bright as you think you are.Comment
-
Don't you have some videos of him chugging water? What do you think?
Have you established that Pacquaio isn't a liar that wanted to cheat with Toradol?
Pacquiao said: “We wanted a shot for numbing the shoulder but we respect the decision of the Commission it was getting better and better but was still not 100 per cent.
"Pacquiao said, “No, I don’t have pain or injury before the fight. I just want to make sure that whatever happened, I’m still there. I’m not saying I’m not 100 percent condition.”
Comment
way to pull yourself together...felt like we were on the verge of another rath meltdown.
Comment