Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

who among suspected PED user got away the most: Pacquaio, Mayweather or Marquez?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by considerthis View Post
    Ok...so you've confirmed my su****ion that you're slightly ******ed then.

    nope you just confirmed to NSB board that you were owned by slighty ******ed poster.

    oh and by the way this technique you were using is no longer original.

    it was used by another genius floyd fans before it did not work then. it will not work now.

    loser, i ruined your life, move on and let it go

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Rath View Post
      nope you just confirmed to NSB board that you were owned by slighty ******ed poster.

      oh and by the way this technique you were using is no longer original.

      it was used by another genius floyd fans before it did not work then. it will not work now.

      loser, i ruined your life, move on and let it go
      ??? you are definitely not all there

      Comment


      • Originally posted by considerthis View Post
        ??? you are definitely not all there
        i can taste the saltiness and bitterness from here LOL

        Comment


        • GTTofAK in this thread.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by SplitSecond View Post
            GTTofAK in this thread.
            an accurate description.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by GTTofAK View Post
              And where did USADA get all this testimony? Oh that is right the LA prosecutor handed it over to them.



              Obviously you. You didn't even bother to find out where this new testimony came from.
              Dude, I already destroyed you and you have the nerve to come back to this thread? Haven't heard from you in days, so I thought you had the good sense to just tuck your tail and go play in traffic. Do I really have to waste my time with you, a certifiable idiot, again?

              Once again, what I stated was that USADA was going after Lance and I proved it. What you've added even helps give details about what I said. Thank you for making yourself look even more like a moron. I take no pride in showing up someone with obvious symptoms of mental ******ation, but for good measure, here is what USADA had:

              "The evidence of the US Postal Service Pro Cycling Team-run scheme is overwhelming and is in excess of 1000 pages, and includes sworn testimony from 26 people, including 15 riders with knowledge of the US Postal Service Team (USPS Team) and its participants’ doping activities. The evidence also includes direct documentary evidence including financial payments, emails, scientific data and laboratory test results that further prove the use, possession and distribution of performance enhancing drugs by Lance Armstrong and confirm the disappointing truth about the deceptive activities of the USPS Team, a team that received tens of millions of American taxpayer dollars in funding."
              http://cyclinginvestigation.usada.org

              They went hard after Armstrong, you imbecile.

              Originally posted by GTTofAK View Post
              He would just take another IV you moron. Armstrong got tested after legs of the race too. He always had time to take a quick IV.



              A retroactive TUE for something WADA code prohibits TUEs for retroactive or otherwise is quite the benefit.



              How do you know that?



              With warning that isn't really much of a problem.



              Actually they hid it for weeks. It would have been very bad had this come out before the fight.



              That makes no sense. You are simply ******. The inside information is what makes it easier to mask. You know when to take an IV.



              USADA said he gave a partial sample which they mixed. They have no evidence that it ever happened.



              Whether or not USADA was tipping off Floyd is not established fact no matter how much you claim it is.
              Your statements "he would just take another IV....there is no evidence he gave a partial sample....no evidence they weren't tipping him off..." is all complete speculation. Maybe f@cking aliens came down and gave him super powers. But answer this. If he just took another IV, why the hell would they go through the trouble of revealing the first IV if they were willing to ignore other IV's? Why wouldn't they ignore both? And don't give me that "some people at USADA were paid off and some weren't" bull**** because you already implied that he was tipped off on when to take the first IV. You also said that there is no evidence he gave a partial urine sample, so you are clearly implying the DCO who visited Floyd during the documented IV was crooked. Do you realize that you are a moron yet, or should I keep going?

              Originally posted by GTTofAK View Post
              "Mr. Benitez advised in writing, “There is no indication in the Commission’s files that it was notified of this matter prior to October 18, 2012.”"

              That being said a key point in the original Halestorm article is that the parites had been asked for comment by Halestorm. That means that USADA knew that the article was going to be published before it was. So when the article was published doesn't start the time line. It when USADA learned about the article which was clearly before they informed the NSYAC. They only informed then NYSAC in resposne to the Halestorm article.
              Stop eating from Hauser's a$$. He has already been proven wrong multiple times, and has even had to retract some of his statements. I would think that by now you all should realize he couldn't even support his own arguments. His bs isn't going to help you.

              Originally posted by GTTofAK View Post
              You know I kind of saw this responce comming from you. I said to myslef 'Self this ****ing moron obviously hasn't read the study so he doesn't know what years the samples were from. He's so ****ing dumb he is going to claim that since they started testing in 2014 its a tested league. This ****ing dumbass is too damn ignorant to know that it takes years before a paper is published and the actual data comes from well before the testing program.'

              This just shows that you are ****** moron who can do little more than search goggle. I have multiple science degrees you ****ing dolt. I read the damn study you cited. They used urine samples from 2008-2013 in 2014 they implemented the program you moron.

              If you had looked you would have easily found that many viewed these results as proof that there was a major PED problem in the UEFA.


              http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-dop...0RJ0UP20150919
              Don't tell me you saw any response coming from me because it's obvious that you didn't. If you did, you wouldn't have said the dumb sh@t that got you dealt with the first time. So now you try to say the UEFA began testing in 2014? Really? I find it heard to believe you have any degree at all if they never taught you to do any research. So yea, your multiple science degrees from the University of Hauser don't quite cut it.
              "The European football union UEFA announced three doping cases for its competitions in the 2006-07 season, four less than in the previous season. The three positive findings compromised two cases of cannabis and one for a high concentration of Betamethasone at a Euro 2008 qualifier. In the 2006-07, UEFA carried out 1662 tests in and out of competitions, including 938 players tested for the blood doping substance EPO."

              This clearly shows that the UEFA was drug testing at least since 2005! The article is from 2007 and is titled "UEFA Continues Doping Fight"
              http://web.archive.org/web/200802192...id=635114.html

              Please stop doing this to yourself. You should talk with people who have a degree in special education. I don't wish to work with mentally ******ed children.


              Originally posted by GTTofAK View Post
              Lets see what Floyd landis had ot say about how hard it was to beat USADA's "Athlete Biological Passport"



              So Floyd Landis with his high school education was able to beat the biological passport. Yeah that is one hell of a gold standard.

              Face it you cant win. On top of simply being smarter than you I know way more about this than you do.
              Oh, Floyd Landis with his HS education was able to beat it. Does that mean Manny Pacquaio was able to beat it too? Who else would be able to beat it. Tell me more.

              First of all, when was Floyd Landis beating these tests? Do you realize what year we are in now? If you think that the testing has just stayed the same since he was relevant, you are mistaken. There have been various upgrades to their testing.

              From 2013: "New EPO Test Could Help Stamp Out Microdosing."
              http://www.velonation.com/News/ID/13...crodosing.aspx

              However, it's not my intention nor my desire to defend agencies that test for doping. It's clear that the ABP has helped reduce doping. The data to suggest that is there. Yes, it is quite possible that some sophisticated cheaters can possibly beat the test. So what is your contention? Is it that everyone can possibly cheat? How does saying it is possible to beat it prove that Mayweather took PED's? Criticizing current drug testing protocols doesn't incriminate those who take the tests, clearly.


              In conclusion, you've shown that you are an idiot once again. I suggest you take those science degrees and shove them up your arse. You aren't nearly as bright as you think you are.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Rath View Post
                i can taste the saltiness and bitterness from here LOL
                way to pull yourself together...felt like we were on the verge of another rath meltdown.

                [IMG]https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/_0eXpam3-J75WIaRDVfzq0hHLFwpQCzTPs***8bfPtU8JT8jQh-QwWDOQE5HvMmY6Wjfl8KbiVCdsOrTzERYx5d1R_fxlC6Pdyj4l tc6JxQlf3vkIfSneRUGQrY2Oqpd10o[/IMG]

                Comment


                • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                  Dude, I already destroyed you and you have the nerve to come back to this thread? Haven't heard from you in days, so I thought you had the good sense to just tuck your tail and go play in traffic. Do I really have to waste my time with you, a certifiable idiot, again?

                  Once again, what I stated was that USADA was going after Lance and I proved it. What you've added even helps give details about what I said. Thank you for making yourself look even more like a moron. I take no pride in showing up someone with obvious symptoms of mental ******ation, but for good measure, here is what USADA had:

                  "The evidence of the US Postal Service Pro Cycling Team-run scheme is overwhelming and is in excess of 1000 pages, and includes sworn testimony from 26 people, including 15 riders with knowledge of the US Postal Service Team (USPS Team) and its participants’ doping activities. The evidence also includes direct documentary evidence including financial payments, emails, scientific data and laboratory test results that further prove the use, possession and distribution of performance enhancing drugs by Lance Armstrong and confirm the disappointing truth about the deceptive activities of the USPS Team, a team that received tens of millions of American taxpayer dollars in funding."
                  http://cyclinginvestigation.usada.org

                  They went hard after Armstrong, you imbecile.


                  Your statements "he would just take another IV....there is no evidence he gave a partial sample....no evidence they weren't tipping him off..." is all complete speculation. Maybe f@cking aliens came down and gave him super powers. But answer this. If he just took another IV, why the hell would they go through the trouble of revealing the first IV if they were willing to ignore other IV's? Why wouldn't they ignore both? And don't give me that "some people at USADA were paid off and some weren't" bull**** because you already implied that he was tipped off on when to take the first IV. You also said that there is no evidence he gave a partial urine sample, so you are clearly implying the DCO who visited Floyd during the documented IV was crooked. Do you realize that you are a moron yet, or should I keep going?


                  Stop eating from Hauser's a$$. He has already been proven wrong multiple times, and has even had to retract some of his statements. I would think that by now you all should realize he couldn't even support his own arguments. His bs isn't going to help you.


                  Don't tell me you saw any response coming from me because it's obvious that you didn't. If you did, you wouldn't have said the dumb sh@t that got you dealt with the first time. So now you try to say the UEFA began testing in 2014? Really? I find it heard to believe you have any degree at all if they never taught you to do any research. So yea, your multiple science degrees from the University of Hauser don't quite cut it.
                  "The European football union UEFA announced three doping cases for its competitions in the 2006-07 season, four less than in the previous season. The three positive findings compromised two cases of cannabis and one for a high concentration of Betamethasone at a Euro 2008 qualifier. In the 2006-07, UEFA carried out 1662 tests in and out of competitions, including 938 players tested for the blood doping substance EPO."

                  This clearly shows that the UEFA was drug testing at least since 2005! The article is from 2007 and is titled "UEFA Continues Doping Fight"
                  http://web.archive.org/web/200802192...id=635114.html

                  Please stop doing this to yourself. You should talk with people who have a degree in special education. I don't wish to work with mentally ******ed children.




                  Oh, Floyd Landis with his HS education was able to beat it. Does that mean Manny Pacquaio was able to beat it too? Who else would be able to beat it. Tell me more.

                  First of all, when was Floyd Landis beating these tests? Do you realize what year we are in now? If you think that the testing has just stayed the same since he was relevant, you are mistaken. There have been various upgrades to their testing.

                  From 2013: "New EPO Test Could Help Stamp Out Microdosing."
                  http://www.velonation.com/News/ID/13...crodosing.aspx

                  However, it's not my intention nor my desire to defend agencies that test for doping. It's clear that the ABP has helped reduce doping. The data to suggest that is there. Yes, it is quite possible that some sophisticated cheaters can possibly beat the test. So what is your contention? Is it that everyone can possibly cheat? How does saying it is possible to beat it prove that Mayweather took PED's? Criticizing current drug testing protocols doesn't incriminate those who take the tests, clearly.


                  In conclusion, you've shown that you are an idiot once again. I suggest you take those science degrees and shove them up your arse. You aren't nearly as bright as you think you are.
                  have you established already with certainty that floyd was dehydrated may 1st?

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by considerthis View Post
                    way to pull yourself together...felt like we were on the verge of another rath meltdown.

                    [IMG]https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/_0eXpam3-J75WIaRDVfzq0hHLFwpQCzTPs***8bfPtU8JT8jQh-QwWDOQE5HvMmY6Wjfl8KbiVCdsOrTzERYx5d1R_fxlC6Pdyj4l tc6JxQlf3vkIfSneRUGQrY2Oqpd10o[/IMG]
                    lay off the salt please, you might get kidney stone. LOL

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Rath View Post
                      have you established already with certainty that floyd was dehydrated may 1st?
                      Don't you have some videos of him chugging water? What do you think?

                      Have you established that Pacquaio isn't a liar that wanted to cheat with Toradol?

                      Pacquiao said: “We wanted a shot for numbing the shoulder but we respect the decision of the Commission it was getting better and better but was still not 100 per cent.
                      http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/boxing...eather-5628491

                      "Pacquiao said, “No, I don’t have pain or injury before the fight. I just want to make sure that whatever happened, I’m still there. I’m not saying I’m not 100 percent condition.”
                      http://www.newsday.com/sports/boxing...ght-1.11350596

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP