Comments Thread For: Cotto Saw Golovkin's WBC Spot as Financially Motivated

[techliam]

The WBC " reserve the right " to do whatever is in their best financial interests at that point in time..... regardless as to how it affects the sport or the fighters..... if you had been paying attention over the last few decades you may have noticed that.

Right, Klitschko has no interest in unifying, right ^^

You " fans " who support an inconsistent sanctioning organisation who has previously been convicted of bribery and corruption over a fighter who has dedicated his life to this sport are the worst.

Golovkin will become undisputed before Klitschko, and he will break Hopkins record without facing a world-class opponent..... just so long as you're happy with that ^^

I prefer real fighters.

Ill be a bigger critic of the WBC's actions then you'll ever be, as your opinions are solely formed by your bias against Golovkin and anything related. I've long criticised their deplorable actions in the past, and will continue to do so where necessary. I'll also give them credit, if they deserve it.

I don't think Golovkin is that good, nowhere near the fight that Hopkins was, and don't recognise his title defences like that. Ward would outclass him. Itd be closer if they were both the same size, but Ward would still win decisively.

However, in this case, the WBC have broken no rules. They may have broken some rule about Canelo still fighting for the title, i'm not too sure. However, GGG being mandatory is a rule I keep quoting, and you ignoring.

Does Wlad want to unify? Probably. But i'm sure they can arrange a unification fight without having to enforce a mandatory. The option for K2 to do so remains there however

[OnePunch]

The WBC had no right to recognize the WBA champ Golovkin as the WBC middleweight mandatory to Cotto as it is against their own rules..... that is why they don't rank Wladimir Klitschko in their top10 at heavyweight. Also, apparently there was no contract.

There you go again, just making stuff up (as usual)

Suiliman already stated that the CONTRACT had a non-disclosure clause, therefore he couldnt comment on it.

Now perhaps you could explain how there is non-disclosure clause in a contract that doesnt exist.

[techliam]

That's not what they did here. Smh. That's what they did in the Kovalev vs. Stevenson situatuon. Totally different. They didn't order anything. They allowed Golovkin to fight for an interim title against Rubio. Simply put, two very different situations

Slightly different scenarios, same rules apply. Read the rules that you keep saying they've broken...

For the avoidance of doubt, a WBC Interim World Championship shall be considered a true WBC World title for all purposes, other than with respect to a bout versus the actual World Champion, absent any order to the contrary from the WBC in its sole discretion.

In the eyes of the rules, the bout between Golovkin and Rubio (and for his interim championship) was a unification bout. It may not often often, or at all, but thats the norm, not a rule...

The link is there above. Go read it

[aboutfkntime]

Ok firstly lets get a few things straight here.

Other champions are barred from the WBC divisional rankings
Divisional rankings do not include champions (interim, silver etc)

There is no rule stating you need to be ranked in the top 10 to fight for any WBC title, which is exactly what I keep posting. Here it is again:

This includes both the interim championship Rubio had, and the championship Cotto had.

Please, show me the rules you two keep babbling over. I can't see them anywhere

I'm just gonna say one thing, and leave it.....


EVERY genuine boxing fan is aware that the WBC is one of the 4 corrupt sanctioning organisations that are currently raping/pillaging the sport of boxing for their own personal profit.

We don't need 4 " NON-PROFIT " sanctioning bodies genius !

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

How could you possibly support one those those inconsistent shower-of-****s, especially when they have previously been convicted of bribery and corruption, over a fighter who has dedicated his life to this sport ?

This latest generation of " fans " are the very worst imaginable.

[techliam]

I'm just gonna say one thing, and leave it.....


EVERY genuine boxing fan is aware that the WBC is one of the 4 corrupt sanctioning organisations that are currently raping/pillaging the sport of boxing for their own personal profit.

We don't need 4 " NON-PROFIT " sanctioning bodies genius !

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

How could you possibly support one those those inconsistent shower-of-****s, especially when they have previously been convicted of bribery and corruption, over a fighter who has dedicated his life to this sport ?

This latest generation of " fans " are the very worst imaginable.

I don't support the WBC. I'm saying they haven't broken any of their rules, which you've claimed numerous times.

If you don't agree with their rules, then that's a completely different argument. I'm with you on that one..

[aboutfkntime]

Ill be a bigger critic of the WBC's actions then you'll ever be, as your opinions are solely formed by your bias against Golovkin and anything related. I've long criticised their deplorable actions in the past, and will continue to do so where necessary. I'll also give them credit, if they deserve it.

I don't think Golovkin is that good, nowhere near the fight that Hopkins was, and don't recognise his title defences like that. Ward would outclass him. Itd be closer if they were both the same size, but Ward would still win decisively.

However, in this case, the WBC have broken no rules. They may have broken some rule about Canelo still fighting for the title, i'm not too sure. However, GGG being mandatory is a rule I keep quoting, and you ignoring.

Does Wlad want to unify? Probably. But i'm sure they can arrange a unification fight without having to enforce a mandatory. The option for K2 to do so remains there however

Except when it benefits Hypekin, right ?

Inconsistent ABC organisation, inconsistent poster.

Cool bro, Klitschko has been attempting to unify the heavyweight division for a decade, but it never occurred him to ask the WBC..... gotcha ^^

[aboutfkntime]

There you go again, just making stuff up (as usual)

Suiliman already stated that the CONTRACT had a non-disclosure clause, therefore he couldnt comment on it.

Now perhaps you could explain how there is non-disclosure clause in a contract that doesnt exist.

No, I never do that, spend all day correcting posters sometimes.

Yesterday it was reported via multiple sources that there was no contract.

Those reports may have been incorrect.

You took Sulaiman's word.

We'll see.

[techliam]

Except when it benefits Hypekin, right ?

Inconsistent ABC organisation, inconsistent poster.

Cool bro, Klitschko has been attempting to unify the heavyweight division for a decade, but it never occurred him to ask the WBC..... gotcha ^^

I don't agree with the rules one bit. But they haven't broken any, like you claimed.

Inconsistent would be arguing they've broken the rules, then beginning to argue the rules are wrong, after realising you made a mistake.

Klitschko can fight Wilder when he likes. He has more than enough leverage to get the fight. Unless you're saying hes been trying to fight Wilder but the WBC wont allow it?

[Kagami Taiga]

Slightly different scenarios, same rules apply. Read the rules that you keep saying they've broken...



In the eyes of the rules, the bout between Golovkin and Rubio (and for his interim championship) was a unification bout. It may not often often, or at all, but thats the norm, not a rule...

The link is there above. Go read it

That's not really the point tho. I know they treated it as a unification the point is how do u unify with a title thats for ranked contenders? They can treat it as whatever they want to give it prestige but all it is is a belt noting the #1 contender in the division. It shouldn't even exist. And it clearly does not even mean anything because since they stripped cotto as per their own rules once again. Golovkin should be elevated. Instwas they are giving Canelo, once again a non ranked fighter, a chance to fight for a belt against someone who's not a champion. Dude. It makes zero sense. U can twist, turn, squiggle, the WBC is at fault here.

[OnePunch]

I don't agree with the rules one bit. But they haven't broken any, like you claimed.

Inconsistent would be arguing they've broken the rules, then beginning to argue the rules are wrong, after realising you made a mistake.

Klitschko can fight Wilder when he likes. He has more than enough leverage to get the fight. Unless you're saying hes been trying to fight Wilder but the WBC wont allow it?

thats his routine around here brother. That, or he just abandons the thread once you expose him as a clown.......