Tweet
I explained the situation to you here.....
But you weren't smart enough to understand the situation, you actually told me that post was irrelevant
Genius, what right to the WBC have to install the WBA champion Gennady Golovkin as the mandatory (AGAINST THEIR OWN FKN RULES)..... and what right do the WBC have to completely ignore Wladimir Klitschko, who has DOMINATED the heavyweight division for a DECADE?
My advise would be to delete the **** post that I replied to above, because there should not be a WBA mandatory for the WBC middleweight title ACCORDING TO THEIR OWN RULES.
According to the WBC rules, they have no right to install Golovkin as mandatory..... so they also have no right to demand that Cotto pay Golovkin any kind of step-aside fee.
But you weren't smart enough to understand the situation, you actually told me that post was irrelevant
Genius, what right to the WBC have to install the WBA champion Gennady Golovkin as the mandatory (AGAINST THEIR OWN FKN RULES)..... and what right do the WBC have to completely ignore Wladimir Klitschko, who has DOMINATED the heavyweight division for a DECADE?
My advise would be to delete the **** post that I replied to above, because there should not be a WBA mandatory for the WBC middleweight title ACCORDING TO THEIR OWN RULES.
According to the WBC rules, they have no right to install Golovkin as mandatory..... so they also have no right to demand that Cotto pay Golovkin any kind of step-aside fee.
They didn't install GGG as a mandatory challenger. He got a mandatory title shot because according to their rules, the WBC interim champ has the right to face the WBC world champion (regardless of what other title he may have with the WBA/WBO/IBF/etc).
Not sure what the issue is here. And yes, that other post about Wlad is still useless. So yea, go ahead and apologize for wasting my time please.
Comment