Would this be the perfect time for the WBC to take a jab at Cotto.
Comments Thread For: Cotto Jabs The WBC, Tells De La Hoya To Pay $1.1 Million
Collapse
-
Comment
-
GGG was mandated because he's the WBC interim champ. He has that right. And he won it after Rubio was mandatory for Sergio but got paid a step aside fee so he could fight Cotto. Rubio then agreed to fight Golovkin that same year in October in a WBC interim and WBA unification bout.Comment
-
GGG was mandated because he's the WBC interim champ. He has that right. And he won it after Rubio was mandatory for Sergio but got paid a step aside fee so he could fight Cotto. Rubio then agreed to fight Golovkin that same year in October in a WBC interim and WBA unification bout.
Did the WBC recognise Klitschko when he beat their #1 guy Povetkin ?
You are a ****head.
Just what we needed, another greasy fanboy supporting a corrupt sanctioning organisation over a proven legend.Comment
-
GGG was mandated because he's the WBC interim champ. He has that right. And he won it after Rubio was mandatory for Sergio but got paid a step aside fee so he could fight Cotto. Rubio then agreed to fight Golovkin that same year in October in a WBC interim and WBA unification bout.Comment
-
GGG is getting a mandatory shot because he is the WBC interim champ, not WBA champ.
And he won the WBC interim title because it also says outright in their policies that unification fights are allowed and Rubio-GGG got together and made the fight for the WBC interim and WBA Super title. Rubio wasn't forced to fight GGG at all.
I don't see how I'm supporting the WBC here since I never said that I was "Team WBC". I even said Cotto shouldn't be paying 300K for sanctioning fees. I'm just telling you what's in their rulebooks, whether I agree with it or not.
You're trolling for sure now. I honestly have no clue what you are looking for. WBC is recognizing GGG because he is the WBC interim champ and has the right to a mandatory because of that. It has nothing to do with him being the WBA champ.Last edited by Raonic; 11-22-2015, 03:03 PM.Comment
-
You absolutely REEK of pac-tardation.
Same dumb fans, same ******ed logic, same fanboy reasoning.
But the real giveaway is this.....
You asshats will NEVER support what is best for boxing, and what is best for the fighters..... and when I say "best for the fighters", I mean BOTH fighters.
You will support, and then blatantly flip-flop..... on EVERYTHING, when it benefits your guy.
Just like the asshat in my sig.Comment
-
You absolutely REEK of pac-tardation.
Same dumb fans, same ******ed logic, same fanboy reasoning.
But the real giveaway is this.....
You asshats will NEVER support what is best for boxing, and what is best for the fighters..... and when I say "best for the fighters", I mean BOTH fighters.
You will support, and then blatantly flip-flop..... on EVERYTHING, when it benefits your guy.
Just like the asshat in my sig.Comment
Comment