You are overestimating Lara and underestimating Murray. Comparing their records against the top men in their own division, until Murray fought GGG, he had 2 disputed points losses, both in world title fights. Lara also has 2 disputed points defeats against top SWWs.
They were on the same level in their respective divisions and Murray is much bigger.
They are not on the same level as a fighter at all, how long have you been following boxing? Also, get a clue about styles.
GGG invincibility would be gone if he faced WArd. His camp knows it as well. Even, Ward said he spoke to Tom Loeffler who said were not trying to fight you. Abel is doing all the talking. GGG willignto go too 168 to fight Froch or Jr but want Ward at 165..lmao Yeah, that tells you right there what's up!!
Yep, Team GGG are protecting their investment, just like Ward said.....
I don't even have a problem with it.
I know exactly why they avoided Ward, and I don't blame them.
My issue is the lies. Team Golovkin need to stop lying to the public, especially to their ******ed fanbase.
Most casual fans are ****tards, plain and simple, they think that boxing is a cross between a video-game and a schoolyard brawl..... just read some of the posts in this thread.
No I'm not. Anyone with eyes and who isn't a Little G-tard can recognise that Lara is levels above Martin Murray in terms of talent.
Murray is **** average. He fought a good fight against an ageing Martinez who probably took him lightly. Other than that, I thought he lost to an ageing Strum and has no significant wins.
If talent was all it took, Dirrell would be HOF, and Froch would be competing for the Commonwealth belt and getting sc****d off the canvas vs Bute
My opinion of Lara is nothing to do with GGG. I watched his fights with Angulo and Canelo before he ever started gobbing off about Golovkin.
If he was decked twice by Angulo and couldn't beat Canelo at 155, he sure as hell isn't going to beat GGG at 160.
I rate Murray better than Lara P4P, btw, but that's just me. As I said, going by their records and results in the respective divisions, they are on the same level.
Of course it is. Golovkin holds a win over Murray and won't fight Lara so obviously you rate Murray higher P4P even though he is **** average.
Murray struggled to beat Sergey Khomitsky twice. In fact, he looked like **** in the fights between Martinez and Golovkin which were all against bums.
Lara has a far better resume and far better results in his division. What significant wins does Murray have? Skill wise, it isn't even a contest.
Erislandy Lara would be the best fighter GGG has ever shared a ring with. There's absolutely no question about that.
My opinion of Lara is nothing to do with GGG. I watched his fights with Angulo and Canelo before he ever started gobbing off about Golovkin.
If he was decked twice by Angulo and couldn't beat Canelo at 155, he sure as hell isn't going to beat GGG at 160.
I rate Murray better than Lara P4P, btw, but that's just me. As I said, going by their records and results in the respective divisions, they are on the same level.
Just wow.... imho, you are 4th member of the worst fanbase in boxing to have your credibility shattered within the last 2 days.
Conveniently the Ward fans forget about the existence of a possible mega fight between GGG and Canelo-Cotto winner...why would he fight Ward if that is looming?
And if it takes supposedly the best fighter in the world to beat you then I'd say you're doing something right....
Conveniently the Ward fans forget about the existence of a possible mega fight between GGG and Canelo-Cotto winner...why would he fight Ward if that is looming?
And if it takes supposedly the best fighter in the world to beat you then I'd say you're doing something right....
Cinnamon-cotton both on record saying cw or no fight, GGG said no cw so how is it even a possible mega fight looming?
Comment