What Fighters Would Have Never Been Champions?

[285Kid]

About 89% of all current and former world champions

[b00g13man]

You need to read the article again Baldimor would have never won a title with one champ neither would have Judah

Erm...Zab beat the man, who beat the man, who beat the man.

[mjbjst]

Carlos boldimir paulie molanage

[////]

Does Broner beat Abril, Rios, Garcia, Manny, Floyd, or Postol? Doubt he could beat any of those guys.

He's one of those 20-time-but-never-actually-champions

[Tony Trick-Pony]

I also have to wonder about Johnny Tapia. He might have won the bantamweight title at some point, but I think that's definitely all he would get. Of course, Tapia didn't really need a title to be popular anyway.

[Luilun]

Erm...Zab beat the man, who beat the man, who beat the man.

Blah Blah Zab ****** he would never win a title of the days of 1 champ with 8 divisions cause those at 154 would be at 147

[imperial1]

Plenty of guys could pick up,straps its holding on to them is the issue ..I don't think Maidana would,have won a belt or Paulie Malinaggi

[b00g13man]

Blah Blah Zab ****** he would never win a title of the days of 1 champ with 8 divisions cause those at 154 would be at 147

Looooool. Zab was the lineal champ. So......

[Tony Trick-Pony]

Plenty of guys could pick up,straps its holding on to them is the issue ..I don't think Maidana would,have won a belt or Paulie Malinaggi

I agree. With one belt they wouldn't have been champions but would have made for some interesting fights nonetheless.

[imperial1]

I agree. With one belt they wouldn't have been champions but would have made for some interesting fights nonetheless.

Agreed ,they would have made for good fights but if boxing had that scenario it would defiantly separate the best from the rest .