Just reading through this thread.
People wanting Cotto to turn his back on a GGG fight, drop the belt, but he will still be viewed as their lineal, even after ducking his biggest challenge?
That's why the lineal tag can be a joke times. Posters who often post praise on fighters for achieving lineal status are now ok with fighters ducking their biggest challenge and protecting that lineal?
People wanting Golovkin to allow Canelo (should he beat Cotto) an extra fight to get to grips with 160 or it's not fair?
Crazy how people's dislike for certain fighters can mess with their stance.
Criticize a fighter for his lack of big fights, but then hope his scheduled big fights fall through. Makes sense.
People wanting Cotto to turn his back on a GGG fight, drop the belt, but he will still be viewed as their lineal, even after ducking his biggest challenge?
That's why the lineal tag can be a joke times. Posters who often post praise on fighters for achieving lineal status are now ok with fighters ducking their biggest challenge and protecting that lineal?
People wanting Golovkin to allow Canelo (should he beat Cotto) an extra fight to get to grips with 160 or it's not fair?
Crazy how people's dislike for certain fighters can mess with their stance.
Criticize a fighter for his lack of big fights, but then hope his scheduled big fights fall through. Makes sense.
Comment