Cotto hangs on Roach's every word, and is very confident with him in his corner. Honestly, Roach may very well be the reason Cotto and Golovkin fight, if they both win their next fights of course.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Roach: Cotto is True Test For Golovkin, Not Lemieux
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Reloaded View Post1 major belt holder and 1 sacrificial lamb that happens to hold a belt , lots of B grade guys win a title and then lose it straight away .
Comment
-
Originally posted by bigdunny1 View PostHe's not just a belt holder he's top ranked middleweight by ever respectable 3rd party that ranks fighters. Again it's a unification fight with two top ranked middleweights that's just facts. That's not what we have been seeing on PBC which is basically one name fighter vs bums not fighters who have headlined their own fights on HBO, who have a belt, who are top ranked, and have the power Lemiuex has. Cotto fans trying too hard again it's simple say his opponent is weak so you can downplay if GGG wins and looks impressive and if he struggles say see he's over rated. All while they know Cotto wants no parts of him. Lame
Thats all thats being said and Roach is right but it doesnt blow sunshine about your new hero so its lame , we know how this works in here .
PBC is free to air , they are doing a good job why are you bashing boxing thats free makes no sense .
Comment
-
Originally posted by Reloaded View PostShow me a title holder thats not ranked , your point is mute Lemieux has beat nobody and if Cotto fights GGG it will be the best fighter Gennady has faced .
Thats all thats being said and Roach is right but it doesnt blow sunshine about your new hero so its lame , we know how this works in here .
PBC is free to air , they are doing a good job why are you bashing boxing thats free makes no sense .Last edited by bigdunny1; 10-02-2015, 06:22 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bigdunny1 View PostAre you ret@rded seriously. Go back to school I said going on 2 years. Did I say it's been 2 years? Reading is fundamental. It's over a year right now and so what is it going on? The answer is 2 you idiot. You don't say it going on a year if it's already past a year now and the fight wouldn't happen for another 6 months on top of that. Fact is since he got the belt he knew who the best middleweight was and he's been making a joke of himself, with long layoffs, catch weights and his heart stops every time he's asked about GGG. He's been ducking GGG ever since he won the title which was only a cherry pick against crippled fighter. If he had any dignity he would of just vacated and gone on fighting whoever he wants at whatever catchweight. Then he and his fans can put a tampon on and stop crying that fans are bashing cotto for holding a title and not fighting the best fighter in that weight class. Instead he's been ducking and holding the belt hostage for going on 2 years.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mathed View PostThe sad thing is that Lemieux would knock Cotto slam out. So if Lemieux is no match for GGG, what challenge will Cotto present? The obvious thing is that Cotto wants no parts of GGG and astute Roach knows why
Comment
-
Originally posted by bigdunny1 View PostNot just ranked I said top ranked. Anywhere from top 3 to top 5 depending on the 3rd party. And no not all title holders are also ranked that high. And who has Cotto beaten at 160? catch weights against a cripple and a bum. Again Cotto and his fans trying way too hard. GGG deserves to be favored but stop acting like he's fighting a nobody. By every non bias account he's one of the best middleweights right now.
GGG is fighting a guy that won a title and will lose a title in his first defense , been lots of them , you will see what an elite fighter does to an ordinary fighter , if its a real competitive fight you are right , if not youre wrong .
Comment
-
Originally posted by KnickTillDeaTh View PostYou are the only ****** here, its going on a year and 5 months, its not goin on 2 years.
I stand by it he's going on 2 years and that's factual. If it hurts your feelings that I didn't break it down to the exact month to make your boyfriend look better that's your problem. But don't quote me saying stick to facts and then look ****** because you couldn't read right and don't understand what the term "going on" means. You backtracking now and looking like a fool
Comment
-
Originally posted by bigdunny1 View PostSeriously dude take your L and walk away you only embarrassing yourself. So you upset because I said it's going on 2 years and not that it's going on 1 year and 5 months? Hahahaha
I stand by it he's going on 2 years and that's factual. If it hurts your feelings that I didn't break it down to the exact month to make your boyfriend look better that's your problem. But don't quote me saying stick to facts and then look ****** because you couldn't read right and don't understand what the term "going on" means. You backtracking now and looking like a fool
First im not angry, second i have not back tracked, in fact what i have done is shown how your view of the situation is nothing more then idiotic ranting. You are up and down this forum bashing Cotto and trying to talk up GGG, it's funny because yoi don't even realize that you're the fan boy. Any way your not going on 2 years until its close to 2 years, this is why your an idiot. No one says its going on 2 years when we havnt even passed the mid point of the year. It's facts stick to 'em or just admit you're a nut juggling, baby swallowing fan boy, and no one will bother trying to correct you with facts.
Comment
Comment