Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Roach: Cotto is True Test For Golovkin, Not Lemieux

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    No you say going on when you are past whatever year you specify if you want to break it down to the month to protect your boyfriends feelings that's you. I haven't been counting months like you, I know it's well over a year and it's going on 2 years and that's a fact. What class in grade school did they tell you when you say its "going on" to break it down to the fraction before you say it. Please tell me so i can find that teacher and smack them for lying to you and making you look like a fool on a message board. Take your L and walk away quietly.

    And I'm not even a fan of GGG you idiot. Ill probably be rooting for the upset with Lemiuiex on fight night. My beef is with Cotto who I used to like before he started holding the middleweight title hostage for going on 2 years!!!! You are clearly a Cotto dyck rider and that's why it upsets you that I said going on 2 years instead of going online and counting the exact months and saying going on 1 year and 5 months because it sounds better to groupies like you. But despite your lack of education both are factual statements next time don't quote somebody with stick to the facts and you won't look ******.
    Last edited by bigdunny1; 10-02-2015, 07:25 PM.

    Comment


    • #72
      Originally posted by KnickTillDeaTh View Post
      Theres a video on youtube when Cotto is asked about GGG he says very clearly with out stuttering that if the fight makes sense then he will go after GGG next, makes sense as in money. Cotto is looking for big paydays to end his career, Geale was a stay busy fight in lead up to the bigger pay day against Canelo. GGG is not a stay busy fight, im sure even your minus IQ can comprehend this. And Martinez tried to cherry pick Cotto, but there goes another fact that you like to twist. GGG became the mando 4 months after Cotto won the title how could Cotto have been ducking him since he won the title? Cotto was going to fight Canelo, the fight broke down so he took a stay busy fight against Geale, which was a legit voluntary, now hes fighting Canelo, i have not seen any ducking as of yet.
      This right here.

      Comment


      • #73
        Originally posted by hieY182 View Post
        Well, the so called "true test" will never come, let's just leave it at that.

        If he beats Lem, he will suddenly become a bum. If he beats Cotto, he will become too small. If he beats Canelo, he will become too green. Lol, I even think if he'd beat Ward, he would become too inactive..even though I think he would lose that fight..

        When the knockout streak will eventually come to an end then people will say "he looked bad","age is showing up" because now its just too standard he knocks his opponent out.

        Anyway boxers and fighters in general from Russia (or from other ex-Soviet countries) seem unhumanly strong at this time. Would be interesting to know if this is just pure variance, some dope or just my illusion.
        Stop being emotional, no one but GGG fans ever claimed any of those guys were tests before the fight, except Murray. Look at the forum's take on Lemiuex now, go read, nobody outside of GGG fans are saying it's a good fight. Just sayng so you don't go crying again afer GGG wins and his critics still don't give a **** about his whack resume.

        Yes, people say Cotto is too small, and he has weighed 155 and 153 respectively. He would be too small. Don't take what Roach says and turn into "See? EVERYONE think Cotto is going to win!".

        Comment


        • #74
          David Lemieux has been beat twice and stopped by Rubio , Alcine was stopped in the first round by Angulo and in his next fight he came out to beat Lemieux easy and never looked like being hurt , why are they talking this guy up he is going to be blown away in this fight .

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by bigdunny1 View Post
            No you say going on when you are past whatever year you specify if you want to break it down to the month to protect your boyfriends feelings that's you. I haven't been counting months like you, I know it's well over a year and it's going on 2 years and that's a fact. What class in grade school did they tell you when you say its "going on" to break it down to the fraction before you say it. Please tell me so i can find that teacher and smack them for lying to you and making you look like a fool on a message board. Take your L and walk away quietly.

            And I'm not even a fan of GGG you idiot. Ill probably be rooting for the upset with Lemiuiex on fight night. My beef is with Cotto who I used to like before he started holding the middleweight title hostage for going on 2 years!!!! You are clearly a Cotto dyck rider and that's why it upsets you that I said going on 2 years instead of going online and counting the exact months and saying going on 1 year and 5 months because it sounds better to groupies like you. But despite your lack of education both are factual statements next time don't quote somebody with stick to the facts and you won't look ******.

            Your looking more and more ****** per post. See I haven't defended Cotto once, just pointed out facts, facts that you purposely distort to support your rants which have no basis in reality. I dont care who you claim to be a fan of, or like or dis like, but you have been wrong from your first post and you're wrong now. It's only you and one other idiot in these forums who says Cotto's been ducking GGG "going on" 2 years, why is that? Even guys who hate Cotto don't say that why? because its not going on 2 years. Fhucking dumb I swear. Lol, not a fan of GGG but you're post's are all over this board talking him up, and my post has been meerly to correct your ******ity on the reference of event to time.

            Fan boy in the closet is what you are.
            Last edited by KnickTillDeaTh; 10-02-2015, 08:40 PM.

            Comment


            • #76
              Originally posted by Reloaded View Post
              David Lemieux has been beat twice and stopped by Rubio , Alcine was stopped in the first round by Angulo and in his next fight he came out to beat Lemieux easy and never looked like being hurt , why are they talking this guy up he is going to be blown away in this fight .
              Man that was a long time ago for a kid who is only 26 today. That was 4 years ago he was young and inexperienced and got rushed too fast. Manny Pacquiao got ko when he was young and inexperienced twice last of which at age 21. 4 years later he was much improved world champ and upset and schooled Marco Antonio barrea. Not saying Lemieux will go on a run like Manny but he is clearly a different fighter today then as a 22 year old and has beaten fighters who are better then Rubio and if he faced him today he would destroy him. You acting like he's coming off a recent loss to rubio. He's had almost double digit fights since then and destroyed everyone since then and won a world title and worked his way up to a top ranked middleweight. GGG deserves to be favored but there are not many if any other middleweights who would be favored against Lemuiex today.
              Last edited by bigdunny1; 10-02-2015, 08:54 PM.

              Comment


              • #77
                Originally posted by Reloaded View Post
                David Lemieux has been beat twice and stopped by Rubio , Alcine was stopped in the first round by Angulo and in his next fight he came out to beat Lemieux easy and never looked like being hurt , why are they talking this guy up he is going to be blown away in this fight .
                Alcine gets knocked out and you forgive him in his next fight. Lemieux gets stopped when he was 22 years old and FOUR YEARS LATER, you still cannot get over it? I have a feeling that if he was not fighting Golovkin, you would be looking at Lemieux as if he was a total beast. He is not exactly the only fighter that Rubio beat either, there are 59 other fighters who lost to him and 51 of those were knocked out. Losing to Rubio is nothing to be ashamed about.

                Comment


                • #78
                  KnickTillDeaTh yeah yeah I know he's going on a 1 year and 5 months not going on 2 years hahaha you sensative h0e no that's not a fact, both statements are facts just 2 different ways to say it. If you need to break it down to the month because it sounds better good for you doesn't mean I have to or that's it's not a fact he's going on 2 years. I can't say he's going on a 1 year because he's past that and I'm not going to go and count every month hes past it just to avoid hurting your feelings you cotto nut hugger. Now stop quoting me and let the grown folks talk. I'm done with you.

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Originally posted by Barcham View Post
                    Alcine gets knocked out and you forgive him in his next fight. Lemieux gets stopped when he was 22 years old and FOUR YEARS LATER, you still cannot get over it? I have a feeling that if he was not fighting Golovkin, you would be looking at Lemieux as if he was a total beast. He is not exactly the only fighter that Rubio beat either, there are 59 other fighters who lost to him and 51 of those were knocked out. Losing to Rubio is nothing to be ashamed about.
                    If those guys can beat him GGG will destroy him , 22 is not young if your real and its not like he was beat by anything special .

                    I will never look at Lemieux as a beast the guy does nothing for me from his first fight to his last fight he has not beat anybody and got beat by average fighters in comparison to now facing GGG , you guys always have the same pattern if its one of your favorites fighting then the opponent is a beast , if its someone you dont like their opponent is a dud .

                    Well I like GGG and his opponent is an average fighter as you will see .

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Originally posted by Barcham View Post
                      Alcine gets knocked out and you forgive him in his next fight. Lemieux gets stopped when he was 22 years old and FOUR YEARS LATER, you still cannot get over it? I have a feeling that if he was not fighting Golovkin, you would be looking at Lemieux as if he was a total beast. He is not exactly the only fighter that Rubio beat either, there are 59 other fighters who lost to him and 51 of those were knocked out. Losing to Rubio is nothing to be ashamed about.
                      So true. David was clearly pushed too fast and mismanaged as a young fighter.he was winning and ran out of gas. Hell if he were signed to with haymon he would not of fought a fighter like rubio till he was 28 years old. He ain't the first fighter who took some losses early his career and got better over the years since. It's actually very common in boxing to improve with years and experience. This is about cotto fans who are tired of having to defend this boy ducking GGG so trying to downplay David in case GGG looks good and if he struggles they can say see he is overated. It's a lame and a stance to ensure no matter the outcome GGG can't get credit. If David were facing Cotto you wouldn't hear any of this crap from them. Cotto just fought a dude coming off 2 loses in his last 4 fights and was GGGs leftovers yet these same fans want to complain about a young David losing 4 years ago? Hilarious.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP