Originally posted by SugarKaineHook
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why did Manny oppose to WADA back in 2010 vs Floyd?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Rath View PostPac did not say he does not want WADA testing it's Floyd random which is not random style drug test. that was questioned.
he want's cut off date.
USADA does not conduct random drug testing
I'll trade you a registered nurse question for a why didn't Pac want WADA style testing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View PostReally, then why didn't ESPN's Kenny ask Pacquiao instead, "why wouldn't you do USADA style testing?"
People seem to be confused with WADA accredited testing protocols versus other agencies auch as USADA or VADA that go by their guidelines...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Isaac Clarke View PostOne wasn't needed under NSAC rules, it was an extra measure Mayweather and USADA agreed to. No NSAC rules were broken or changed.
whic also mean that the TUE given by USADA just work under USADA rules,
which also follows NSAC did not give Floyd TUE which therefore his IV was illegalLast edited by Rath; 02-21-2016, 10:49 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View PostHurts don't it? Yall be bumping threads in despair when Pac's on high radar. I figured I'd do the same.
I'll trade you a registered nurse question for a why didn't Pac want WADA style testing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by HeroBando View PostThey didn't trust an org on Floyds payroll doing it. Their su****ion proved well founded, Usadas boxing stint has been a total joke
VADA founded in 2011....ouch..
Comment
-
Originally posted by Isaac Clarke View PostDumb question by a dumb poster.
USADA admits they can not suspend/stop a fight if a fighter is found positive of banned substance only the commission has that power.
now answer the question.
who's higher USADA, or NSAC.
USADA was just an additional requested random drug testing agency that does not conduct random drug testing.
the fight will go on with or without USADA but can not proceed with out NSAC.
Comment
Comment