Beating Paul Smith earns you the number 2 spot on a P4P list...
Collapse
-
-
It's funny because I was a HUGE Ward fan during and after the Super Six, then he lost me with his bull**** lately and I became one of his bigger haters. I'm still not back as a fan, but the need to defend him against all the ******ation I see on NSB is making me look like I'm a huge fan again.Comment
-
Comment
-
I understand "the big fight", but wtf does the rest have to do with being a P4P fighter?Comment
-
So then Pac should still be number one. And why not leave Floyd on the list. His accomplishments should be enough for him to remain at number 1 for at least another 4 years of inactivity. Even if he is retired. There is always a chance he might come back.Ward already passed the criteria to be high on a p4p list years ago. He doesn't need to prove he's that good, he already has. You keep acting like he hasn't fought at all since he beat Froch and Paul Smith was his first fight since. He beat a top 10 SMW in 2013 and missed one year. Now he's back. We already know he's one of the 5 best fighters in the sport. He's not ranked at 168 because he still hasn't fought at 168 since Rodriguez.
Everyone knows what this is really about. Your fear is so obvious I can smell the piss in your pants through my screen. It's okay, Ward being back in the ring isn't so scary.
I have more stringent criteria than beating one contender at a catchweight every 2 or 3 years. The way you rate fighters, you would be happy to come home with the best looking girl at the ugly girl contest.
He was at one time. Until he fights a top contender today, I have no idea where he ranks. I certainly will not put him back on a P4P list because he beat a fat, out of condition, poorly trained, lazy excuse for a prize fighter in Paul Smith.
But hey, you think Cotto is a deserving MW title holder so that doesn't say much for your opinion.Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Quote me on that I'll wait while you reach some more.So then Pac should still be number one. And why not leave Floyd on the list. His accomplishments should be enough for him to remain at number 1 for at least another 4 years of inactivity. Even if he is retired. There is always a chance he might come back.
I have more stringent criteria than beating one contender at a catchweight every 2 or 3 years. The way you rate fighters, you would be happy to come home with the best looking girl at the ugly girl contest.
He was at one time. Until he fights a top contender today, I have no idea where he ranks. I certainly will not put him back on a P4P list because he beat a fat, out of condition, poorly trained, lazy excuse for a prize fighter in Paul Smith.
But hey, you think Cotto is a deserving MW title holder so that doesn't say much for your opinion.
Don't post any other reply to me unless you are quoting which you stated.Comment
-
You can't use Transnational to back up one point while you slag them in other threads. Most sources consider the RING title to be the lineal title. Ward was stripped by RING. The lineal title has as much weight in the boxing world as P4P lists. In other words... none at all. Unless there is a sanctioning body behind a title, it means nothing.
Do you see Ward on their P4P rankings? I don't.
http://www.tbrb.org/p4p/Comment



Comment