Mayweather's IV injection (Master thread)

[travestyny]

DUCKY,

1) DCO nor anyone else can approve of what Floyd did at that point in time.

2) DCO is NOT a doctor!

3) Floyd and his Dr Ariza get to decide! If they screwed up, it does not matter if the DCO was there!


4) Fortunately, we have lots of stats about Floyd just before the IV!

- Weight was rock stable! Been that way for a decade according to Floyd!

- We actually saw Floyd drink enough fluids to recuperate from his possible MILD dehydration.

- USADA/WADA states that all that is needed is a couple of cups of fluids per pound lost and you are all good! Floyd did that!

- Vitals all normal!




Wait? I will not make you wait 175+ pages!

QUACK, QUACK, QUACK!!!!


.

Shut up, you 4-0 bet welching ducking bltch. Your conspiracy theory was destroyed.

Sample A is a mixture of those 2 urine samples. There the second is diluting the initial one.

b) Threshold substances, there can be traces but the delay and dilution will drive down the numbers

There can be traces!!!! LMAOOOOOOO. And why the fvvck would the DCO lie to help Mayweather by making a paper trail and having 3 independent doctors look into what happened? What's next? You going to tell us about plasticizers again!? GIVE UP!

[img]https://media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]

[RuleOfTheSpear]

I don't think USADA will be used in the 2nd fight. He got a way with those IV masking fluids. This will be VADA or no fight. Pac will be dumb if he accepts a fight with Floyd with USADA on board again.

If you're fighting Floyd, it's his way or the highway. It has always been on his terms. Expect no VADA testing again..

[travestyny]

If you're fighting Floyd, it's his way or the highway. It has always been on his terms. Expect no VADA testing again..

VADA testing only means temp DCOs take the piss to the labs instead of full employed DCOs, and less testing than a WADA signatory.

VADA basically does nothing except transport piss and blood.

[ADP02]

DUCKY,

1) DCO nor anyone else can approve of what Floyd did at that point in time.

2) DCO is NOT a doctor!

3) Floyd and his Dr Ariza get to decide! If they screwed up, it does not matter if the DCO was there!


4) Fortunately, we have lots of stats about Floyd just before the IV!

- Weight was rock stable! Been that way for a decade according to Floyd!

- We actually saw Floyd drink enough fluids to recuperate from his possible MILD dehydration.

- USADA/WADA states that all that is needed is a couple of cups of fluids per pound lost and you are all good! Floyd did that!

- Vitals all normal!




Wait? I will not make you wait 175+ pages!

QUACK, QUACK, QUACK!!!!


.

Shut up, you 4-0 bet welching ducking bltch. Your conspiracy theory was destroyed.






There can be traces!!!! LMAOOOOOOO. And why the fvvck would the DCO lie to help Mayweather by making a paper trail and having 3 independent doctors look into what happened? What's next? You going to tell us about plasticizers again!? GIVE UP!

Different thread, same DUCK!

All you do is DEFLECT to something else!



As for your post, my comments stands as is. You dilute and delay you can have results that are different than if you took a full sample 6 hours earlier!

Then add what could have transpired during those 6 hours!


Remember the 3 Nick Diaz results were different? How come?


KABADABOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!!


…. but I am talking to a QUACK!!!! What else should I expect. DUCKY!!!




.

[travestyny]

Different thread, same DUCK!

All you do is DEFLECT to something else!



As for your post, my comments stands as is. You dilute and delay you can have results that are different than if you took a full sample 6 hours earlier!

Then add what could have transpired during those 6 hours!


Remember the 3 Nick Diaz results were different? How come?


KABADABOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!!


…. but I am talking to a QUACK!!!! What else should I expect. DUCKY!!!




.

I remember you got murdered and DUCKED a challenge about Nick Diaz


Also remember your Floyd Mayweather conspiracy theory got destroyed.

So if GC/MS or whatever measures EPO values below a threshold, as an example, due to a 6 hour delay and drinking fluids plus an IV that diluted the urine sample just enough.
.

b) I already showed you that its possible that the SG can go back up before the concentration of the PED comes back up. In threshold substances, this is important!!!

b) Threshold substances, there can be traces but the delay and dilution will drive down the numbers

Similar with EPO .... they may have a su****ious result but still state it as negative. You said that if there is any EPO, it will be flagged as positive. EPO like I said and now you know, its produced naturally in the body.

You can dilute by way of an IV yet pass the sg test and still produce a count that is below the threshold allowed for certain substances.

COURT OF ARBITRATION FOR SPORT:

rEPO is not a “threshold substance”

WADA THRESHOLD SUBSTANCES:

OOOPS!

LMAOOOOOO. ******ddddddddd!

[img]https://media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]

[Spoon23]

If you're fighting Floyd, it's his way or the highway. It has always been on his terms. Expect no VADA testing again..

If that's the case. We'll see a roided up Floyd again. Rather not see a rematch if Floyd will be juiced. That defeats the purpose of a rematch. So much taint in the first fight from those USADA and NSAC biased actions for Floyd. IVs, TUEs.. The works!

[pasawayako]

If you're fighting Floyd, it's his way or the highway. It has always been on his terms. Expect no VADA testing again..

If no VADA and they use USADA again then floyd can mask whatever PEDS he wants with the IV. Anyway as long as pac isn't injured he will surely beat floyd again with no problem even if floyd inject himself with a gallon of IV.

[ADP02]

[B] COURT OF ARBITRATION FOR SPORT:

I explained it to DUCKY but he is still STUCK ON ******!


and that is why he is DUCKING THIS CHALLENGE!!!



I saw that list BEFORE the challenge DUCKY! Right DUCKY?

I explained to you that there is a difference between that list and what I was talking about. There can still be a threshold type test without it being on that list of threshold substances! That is what I meant and you know that. If you didn't by now then you are one DUMB QUACK!!!!


Even in the debate,
1) you AGREED to that debate BUT like these current 175+ pages, YOU DUCKED from the challenge
2) and backtracked on your initial statements!

SCOPE:
"Does or can there be threshold test"

"example: 4/1 Ratio (T/E) test"


and more


DUCKY: "I'm fine with that"
"There are no thresholds, no ratios, scores, …. none of that"


Then came 100 pages of backtracking …..



THIS TIME, YOU NEEDED TO AGREE TO THE ACTUAL TOPIC/SCOPE and YOU QUACKED every time by either DUCKING to a different challenge or pretending to accept but if one read your post's fine print, one would realize that the LIAR and CHEATER is Travestyny, the DUCK!!!



FINALLY, WADA/USADA disagrees with you on all counts!

WHY THE IV RULE?

To protect clean sport and athlete health and safety. It is a fact that IVs can be used to change blood test results (such as hematocrit where EPO or blood doping is being used), mask urine test results (by dilution) or by administering prohibited substances in a way that will more quickly be cleared from the body in order to beat an anti-doping test.

Some reports suggest that administration of IV infusions, including dietary supplement and vitamin ****tails, are being provided to athletes for recuperation, recovery or lifestyle reasons.

This medical practice is prohibited at all times without prior TUE approval.

In summary,
this DUCK, said that only threshold substances can be tested by way of threshold type tests. I disagreed with him! DUCKY CANNOT get himself to agree to the challenge so he needs to DEFLECT!






You were defending Nick Diaz

BUT Nick Diaz was caught 3 times and suspended 3 times for marijuana use and in those cases, he tried to dilute his urine samples!

Nick Diaz admits to marijuana use!

Nick Diaz's sample results all had levels of marijuana and some were over the threshold!


Even after all of that, Nick Diaz was suspended again by USADA

On April 9, 2018, Diaz accepted a one-year USADA sanction for failing to report his whereabouts to USADA on three occasions from the third quarter of 2016 to the first quarter of 2017. The sanction is retroactive to April 9, 2017, and Diaz would be eligible to compete again on April 9, 2018

DUCKY is AGAIN trying to defend a CHEAT!!!


Finally, when we were debating that, you were claiming that what I stated was BS but now I read recent posts of yours bringing up what I stated!

WHAT A CLOWN!!!


.




.

[travestyny]

Similar with EPO .... they may have a su****ious result but still state it as negative. You said that if there is any EPO, it will be flagged as positive. EPO like I said and now you know, its produced naturally in the body.

Yes, that's right idiot. If they find EPO in the test, then it's a positive. I think you know that now, don't you?

******DDDDDD!

[img]https://media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]

[ADP02]

Yes, that's right idiot. If they find EPO in the test, then it's a positive. I think you know that now, don't you?

******DDDDDD!

DEFLECTOR, does NOT respond to my post which he knows that even recently he said that EPO has not and CANNOT have ever had threshold type tests! BUT now is DUCKING this challenge!



As for your post:
You DUCKING DUMBO, EPO IS naturally produced in the body. Synthetic EPO is NOT produced in the body!


The 2 are similar in many ways and when looking at results, there can be ambiguity. It is NOT straight forward where one can get the result where there is a quantifiable amount of synthetic EPO or that there is no amount quantified. At times, the test results can look su****ious but the tester will not conclude it as a positive for rEPO.


You on the other hand have said there is an image and that is it! WRONG! There is more to it than that. There IS SCIENCE involved! It is complex and there can be mistakes made along the way including determining the result as postive or negative!


Making this mistake before is acceptable. You still making these mistakes at this point in time is NOT! Especially when you call the other person names and YOU, the DUCK, is WRONG!!!


****** is interpreting that every EXPERT who called an EPO test a threshold type test is wrong and you are right! Now you are no longer confident once I challenged you on this, DUCKY!!!!



CHALLENGE IS ON!

.... BUT we are dealing with DUCKY the QUACK!


Deal with the TRUTH! YOU are SCARED!!!!

[IMG]https://media1.*****.com/media/3o7TKqnN349PBUtGFO/*****.gif[/IMG]



.