Comments Thread For: Thurman Breaks Down Why Khan is Third For Mayweather

[dan_cov]

I think Lara and Cotto are more deserving and you three should stop pulling each others pigtails and fight already.

[aboutfkntime]

Haha. Thurman is not that big of a name. And Brook.... who has ever heard of him in America?

Khan is more accomplished than both of them. He's got Olympic pedigree. World champion in two weight classes. The deepest resume at 147 after Mayweather and Pacquiao.

Nah, even Shawn Porter has a better resume at 147 than Amir Khan.

[aboutfkntime]

I think Lara and Cotto are more deserving

and you three should stop pulling each others pigtails and fight already.

Post-of-the-day !

I totally agree with both points Dan, great post !

[Southpaw93]

Most agree with that!!! You have to go beat one of the best in the Top Ten before you even get considered. Khan won't fight Brook or Thurman or Porter or Bradley or Provodnikov or Guerrero... He thinks he can slide to the front of the list and tell you who he beat in 2010!!!! What a weasel.

Honestly neither thurman or brooks resume is any better, even at welterweight. Thurmans best win is Guerrero, I would rank the khan win over alexander better than that, and he is going to fight Callazo next, hardly a good fight. Brook has fought bums upon bums and had a solid win over porter who is pretty good, and went back to fighting bums. All 3 of them dont have good resumes. But khans resume overall at jww and ww is better.

[justblaze813]

I think it will come down to who has a better ppv draw. So it might be Khan. I like Thurman and Brook more than Khan I just don't think they would pull in more buys.

[aboutfkntime]

Honestly neither thurman or brooks resume is any better, even at welterweight. Thurmans best win is Guerrero, I would rank the khan win over alexander better than that, and he is going to fight Callazo next, hardly a good fight. Brook has fought bums upon bums and had a solid win over porter who is pretty good, and went back to fighting bums. All 3 of them dont have good resumes. But khans resume overall at jww and ww is better.

His resume period, is better..... but not at welter.

Porter has a better resume at 147.

Neither Thurman nor Porter will trouble Mayweather, fcuk those fights.

Brook has a title and 1 good win, but then he fought Gavin, so ?

[aboutfkntime]

I think it will come down to who has a better ppv draw. So it might be Khan. I like Thurman and Brook more than Khan I just don't think they would pull in more buys.

good point, dammit !

[Dle]

CON MAN KHAN HAS NO PPV APPEAL. WHO ARE YOU FOOLING. EVEN IF MAYWEATHER (with most PPV sales ever) CON WILL STINK UP THE PPV NUMBERS. I WOULD NEVER PAY TO SEE ANY KAHN FIGHT, NOT EVEN TO SEE HIM LOSE!

[Nightfall]

CON MAN KHAN HAS NO PPV APPEAL. WHO ARE YOU FOOLING. EVEN IF MAYWEATHER (with most PPV sales ever) CON WILL STINK UP THE PPV NUMBERS. I WOULD NEVER PAY TO SEE ANY KAHN FIGHT, NOT EVEN TO SEE HIM LOSE!

he also would stink up the fight. he looked terrible against algieri

[FeFist]

It's saddening watching these fighters disgrace themselves over a potential showdown with Mayweather.