Comments Thread For: Thurman Breaks Down Why Khan is Third For Mayweather

[TLC8]

Keith Thurman is honestly full of crap.

He says that Khan needs to fight a true welterweight yet he just fought Guerrero (who is not a true WW) and that's his best win. He just also went on record calling Collazo, who Khan bashed up, a true welterweight, so the guys logic is clearly flawed, and here its no different.

LOL!!! You're an idiot!!!

[TLC8]

I don't even rate Khan as third anyone of the top ten welters would more than likely beat Khan.Your as good as your last fight and on that showing Khan was pathetic !

Yep! Look at it this way. Khan won't fight, can't beat: Thurman, Brook, Porter, Bradley, Guerrero, Provodnikov, Marquez, so where does that leave Khan standing after such a poor outing against a blown up a Welterweight Algieri who Pacquiao knocked down 6x?!!?

[TLC8]

Khan would be guaranteed a Mayweather fight if he had fought Brook and won. He chose to avoid Brook and now doesn't deserve the fight IMO.

Most agree with that!!! You have to go beat one of the best in the Top Ten before you even get considered. Khan won't fight Brook or Thurman or Porter or Bradley or Provodnikov or Guerrero... He thinks he can slide to the front of the list and tell you who he beat in 2010!!!! What a weasel.

[Furn]

Make a list of the 10 combined best fighters Brooke, Thurman and Khan have beaten.

8 Of them will be from Khan's resume.

Thurman's fighting Khans leftovers ffs.

Being undefeated means nothing when youve beaten only one ok fighter.

[FrankieBruno]

thurman has to realize that khan brings something to the table, i.e money and a brand

and brook brings a title


what does thurman bring? no title and his profile isnt as big as Khans because he doesnt have the resume yet.

these here are the facts of life

[Rip Chudd]

Khan's win over Alexander is better than any win on Thurman's resume.

[Jewish-Reptile]

... So, no Lara?...

Dude has no heart, no chin, I don't rate him at all. Also when I think of fights I want to see Lara is behind Mayweather in terms of excitement, I know that has zero to do with the possibility of him defeating him but I just don't see Lara keeping pace when the going gets tough, he'd let the fight slip away upon realising he was in for 12 hard rounds, besides the point anyway Floyd would make him miss all night. Their is too slick and slick, Floyd can't be outboxed in my opinion.

[thack]

The only thing Khan brings to the table is the fact that he's by far the most disliked fighter in history......and with that he's miles a head !
Fight Brook you limp **** !

[Lazakill]

LOL!!! You're an idiot!!!

Couldn't debate it so you call me an idiot. I know, it's hard sometimes to debate the truth.

[Lazakill]

Yep! Look at it this way. Khan won't fight, can't beat: Thurman, Brook, Porter, Bradley, Guerrero, Provodnikov, Marquez, so where does that leave Khan standing after such a poor outing against a blown up a Welterweight Algieri who Pacquiao knocked down 6x?!!?

So in your mind, who deserves Mayweather?

If you bring up Porter, Thurman or Brook, then what you've just said automatically cancels out because Thurman has only fought Guerrero, Brook has only fought Porter and Porter has only fought and beat Alexander and lost to Brook.

Resume's are really deep with these guys, aren't they. (sarcasm if you don't clock on)